Principles and Practices of Community Engagement in AI for Population Health: Formative Qualitative Study of the AI for Diabetes Prediction and Prevention Project.

Q2 Medicine
Ibukun-Oluwa Omolade Abejirinde, Ijeoma Uchenna Itanyi, Kathy Kornas, Remziye Zaim, Shion Guha, Victoria Chui, Lorraine Lipscombe, Laura C Rosella, James Shaw
{"title":"Principles and Practices of Community Engagement in AI for Population Health: Formative Qualitative Study of the AI for Diabetes Prediction and Prevention Project.","authors":"Ibukun-Oluwa Omolade Abejirinde, Ijeoma Uchenna Itanyi, Kathy Kornas, Remziye Zaim, Shion Guha, Victoria Chui, Lorraine Lipscombe, Laura C Rosella, James Shaw","doi":"10.2196/69497","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Preventing diabetes is a priority for governments and health systems worldwide. Artificial intelligence (AI) has the potential to inform prevention and planning. However, there is little guidance on how patients, caregivers, and communities are engaged in AI life cycle stages.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This formative qualitative study aimed to identify principles for meaningful community engagement. The goal was to support the responsible use of machine learning models in diabetes prevention and management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a literature scan on how AI or digital health initiatives have engaged patients and communities. A participatory workshop was then organized with patients, caregivers, community organizations, clinicians, and policymakers. In the workshop, we identified and ranked guiding principles for community engagement in AI for population health. We also outlined key considerations for implementing these principles.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 10 principles for patient and community engagement in AI for health care from 6 papers and developed a conceptual framework for community engagement on AI. A total of 30 workshop participants discussed and ranked the top 6 principles: trust, equity, accountability, transparency, codesign, and value alignment. Participants noted that embedding community engagement in the AI life cycle requires inclusivity and diversity. Additionally, implementers should leverage existing resources and adopt a centralized approach to AI decision-making.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study offers useful insights for community-focused AI deployment that centers the values of patients and communities. The identified principles can guide meaningful engagement on the use of AI in health systems, while future research can operationalize the conceptual framework.</p>","PeriodicalId":36208,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Participatory Medicine","volume":"17 ","pages":"e69497"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12490773/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Participatory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/69497","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Preventing diabetes is a priority for governments and health systems worldwide. Artificial intelligence (AI) has the potential to inform prevention and planning. However, there is little guidance on how patients, caregivers, and communities are engaged in AI life cycle stages.

Objective: This formative qualitative study aimed to identify principles for meaningful community engagement. The goal was to support the responsible use of machine learning models in diabetes prevention and management.

Methods: We conducted a literature scan on how AI or digital health initiatives have engaged patients and communities. A participatory workshop was then organized with patients, caregivers, community organizations, clinicians, and policymakers. In the workshop, we identified and ranked guiding principles for community engagement in AI for population health. We also outlined key considerations for implementing these principles.

Results: We identified 10 principles for patient and community engagement in AI for health care from 6 papers and developed a conceptual framework for community engagement on AI. A total of 30 workshop participants discussed and ranked the top 6 principles: trust, equity, accountability, transparency, codesign, and value alignment. Participants noted that embedding community engagement in the AI life cycle requires inclusivity and diversity. Additionally, implementers should leverage existing resources and adopt a centralized approach to AI decision-making.

Conclusions: Our study offers useful insights for community-focused AI deployment that centers the values of patients and communities. The identified principles can guide meaningful engagement on the use of AI in health systems, while future research can operationalize the conceptual framework.

社区参与人口健康人工智能的原则和实践:糖尿病预测和预防人工智能项目的形成定性研究。
背景:预防糖尿病是世界各国政府和卫生系统的优先事项。人工智能(AI)有可能为预防和规划提供信息。然而,关于患者、护理人员和社区如何参与人工智能生命周期阶段的指导很少。目的:本形成性质的研究旨在确定有意义的社区参与的原则。目标是支持在糖尿病预防和管理中负责任地使用机器学习模型。方法:我们对人工智能或数字健康倡议如何吸引患者和社区进行了文献扫描。随后,患者、护理人员、社区组织、临床医生和政策制定者组织了一个参与性讲习班。在研讨会上,我们确定了社区参与人口健康人工智能的指导原则并对其进行了排名。我们还概述了实施这些原则的关键考虑因素。结果:我们从6篇论文中确定了患者和社区参与医疗保健人工智能的10项原则,并制定了社区参与人工智能的概念框架。总共有30名研讨会参与者讨论并排名了最重要的6个原则:信任、公平、责任、透明度、协同设计和价值一致性。与会者指出,将社区参与纳入人工智能生命周期需要包容性和多样性。此外,实施者应利用现有资源并采用集中方法进行人工智能决策。结论:我们的研究为以社区为中心的人工智能部署提供了有用的见解,以患者和社区的价值观为中心。确定的原则可以指导在卫生系统中使用人工智能的有意义参与,而未来的研究可以将概念框架付诸实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Participatory Medicine
Journal of Participatory Medicine Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信