Comparing Pain and Anxiety Levels during Local Anesthesia Administration Using Intra- and Extraoral Vibratory Systems.

Q3 Dentistry
Sai Geeta Mamilla, Sampath Reddy Cheruku, Zia Uddin Mohammad, Sarada Penmetcha, Swathi Swarna Silla, Anusha Reddy Gollapalli
{"title":"Comparing Pain and Anxiety Levels during Local Anesthesia Administration Using Intra- and Extraoral Vibratory Systems.","authors":"Sai Geeta Mamilla, Sampath Reddy Cheruku, Zia Uddin Mohammad, Sarada Penmetcha, Swathi Swarna Silla, Anusha Reddy Gollapalli","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10005-3163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Children with trypanophobia may develop anxiety by simply seeing healthcare professionals. Recently, dentists have explored using gels with vibrating devices under cold temperatures to mask pain.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of intra- and extraoral vibratory systems with conventional local anesthesia (LA) in assessing pain perception and anxiety in children.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A total of 120 children, aged 6-10 years, needing dental procedures with LA, were divided into three groups of 40 each. Group I received conventional treatment, while groups II and III were treated with intra- and extraoral vibratory systems, respectively. Anxiety levels were recorded using pulse oximetry, and pain perception was measured using the visual analog scale (VAS) and face, legs, activity, cry, and consolability (FLACC) scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Anxiety levels showed no significant difference between groups, but pain scores measured by VAS were significantly lower in groups II and III. FLACC scores showed no significant differences.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Intra- and extraoral vibratory systems can be effective adjuncts to conventional LA techniques.</p><p><strong>How to cite this article: </strong>Mamilla SG, Cheruku SR, Mohammad ZU, <i>et al.</i> Comparing Pain and Anxiety Levels during Local Anesthesia Administration Using Intra- and Extraoral Vibratory Systems. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2025;18(7):820-824.</p>","PeriodicalId":36045,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry","volume":"18 7","pages":"820-824"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12486611/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-3163","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Children with trypanophobia may develop anxiety by simply seeing healthcare professionals. Recently, dentists have explored using gels with vibrating devices under cold temperatures to mask pain.

Aim: This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of intra- and extraoral vibratory systems with conventional local anesthesia (LA) in assessing pain perception and anxiety in children.

Design: A total of 120 children, aged 6-10 years, needing dental procedures with LA, were divided into three groups of 40 each. Group I received conventional treatment, while groups II and III were treated with intra- and extraoral vibratory systems, respectively. Anxiety levels were recorded using pulse oximetry, and pain perception was measured using the visual analog scale (VAS) and face, legs, activity, cry, and consolability (FLACC) scale.

Results: Anxiety levels showed no significant difference between groups, but pain scores measured by VAS were significantly lower in groups II and III. FLACC scores showed no significant differences.

Conclusion: Intra- and extraoral vibratory systems can be effective adjuncts to conventional LA techniques.

How to cite this article: Mamilla SG, Cheruku SR, Mohammad ZU, et al. Comparing Pain and Anxiety Levels during Local Anesthesia Administration Using Intra- and Extraoral Vibratory Systems. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2025;18(7):820-824.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

比较使用口内和口外振动系统进行局部麻醉时的疼痛和焦虑水平。
背景:患有锥虫恐惧症的儿童可能仅仅通过看医疗保健专业人员就产生焦虑。最近,牙医们探索了在低温下使用带有振动装置的凝胶来掩盖疼痛。目的:本研究旨在比较口内和口外振动系统与常规局部麻醉(LA)在评估儿童疼痛感知和焦虑方面的有效性。设计:120名6-10岁需要LA牙科手术的儿童分为三组,每组40人。I组采用常规治疗,II组和III组分别采用口内和口外振动系统治疗。使用脉搏血氧仪记录焦虑水平,使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)和面部、腿部、活动、哭泣和安慰(FLACC)量表测量疼痛感知。结果:两组间焦虑水平无显著差异,但VAS疼痛评分明显低于两组。FLACC评分差异无统计学意义。结论:口内和口外振动系统可作为常规LA技术的有效辅助。如何引用本文:Mamilla SG, Cheruku SR, Mohammad ZU等。比较使用口内和口外振动系统进行局部麻醉时的疼痛和焦虑水平。中华临床儿科杂志,2015;18(7):820-824。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
135
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信