{"title":"Optimizing Laboratory Diagnostics Education: Research on the Doctor-Patient-Technician Integrated Teaching Model Based on Medical STEM Concepts.","authors":"Zhengkang Li, Liwen Ma, Jinxin Lai, Xinqiang Zhang, Chengyuan He, Yuwei Di, Bing Gu","doi":"10.1177/23821205251384390","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aims to reform and optimize laboratory diagnostics education by developing an innovative teaching model based on M-STEM (Medical Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Students majoring in clinical medicine at South China University of Technology were included in this study and were randomly assigned to either a traditional group or an M-STEM learning group. The M-STEM instructional design emphasized interdisciplinary integration, role-based learning, and hands-on inquiry. Both quantitative data and qualitative feedback were collected to evaluate learning outcomes and teaching effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For laboratory lectures, the proportion of students who were very satisfied was significantly higher in the M-STEM group compared to the traditional group (79.3% vs 51.6%, <i>P</i> = .025). All participants in the M-STEM group expressed approval of the learning design, while those in the traditional learning group did not reach a full consensus. Both groups demonstrated a relatively low willingness to engage in course design (61.0%). A survey on students' participation in curriculum design revealed that when confronting complex clinical problems, students were most inclined to seek assistance from professionals in the roles of doctors and laboratory technicians. When queried about which interdisciplinary integration is likely to offer greater support, students from both groups predominantly selected social psychology. Nevertheless, there existed a notable difference: the proportion of students in the traditional group who opted for economics was significantly higher than that in the M-STEM group (32.3% vs 10.3%, <i>P</i> = .04). In contrast, M-STEM students tend to focus more on integrating key disciplines and are reluctant to involve an excessive number of disciplines.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The M-STEM pedagogy can stimulate students' interest and promote multidisciplinary integration, enabling learners to gain a deeper understanding of the disease and develop effective solutions.</p>","PeriodicalId":45121,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development","volume":"12 ","pages":"23821205251384390"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12484915/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23821205251384390","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: This study aims to reform and optimize laboratory diagnostics education by developing an innovative teaching model based on M-STEM (Medical Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics).
Methods: Students majoring in clinical medicine at South China University of Technology were included in this study and were randomly assigned to either a traditional group or an M-STEM learning group. The M-STEM instructional design emphasized interdisciplinary integration, role-based learning, and hands-on inquiry. Both quantitative data and qualitative feedback were collected to evaluate learning outcomes and teaching effectiveness.
Results: For laboratory lectures, the proportion of students who were very satisfied was significantly higher in the M-STEM group compared to the traditional group (79.3% vs 51.6%, P = .025). All participants in the M-STEM group expressed approval of the learning design, while those in the traditional learning group did not reach a full consensus. Both groups demonstrated a relatively low willingness to engage in course design (61.0%). A survey on students' participation in curriculum design revealed that when confronting complex clinical problems, students were most inclined to seek assistance from professionals in the roles of doctors and laboratory technicians. When queried about which interdisciplinary integration is likely to offer greater support, students from both groups predominantly selected social psychology. Nevertheless, there existed a notable difference: the proportion of students in the traditional group who opted for economics was significantly higher than that in the M-STEM group (32.3% vs 10.3%, P = .04). In contrast, M-STEM students tend to focus more on integrating key disciplines and are reluctant to involve an excessive number of disciplines.
Conclusion: The M-STEM pedagogy can stimulate students' interest and promote multidisciplinary integration, enabling learners to gain a deeper understanding of the disease and develop effective solutions.
目的:通过建立基于M-STEM(医学科学、技术、工程和数学)的创新教学模式,改革和优化实验室诊断学教育。方法:以华南理工大学临床医学专业学生为研究对象,随机分为传统组和M-STEM学习组。M-STEM教学设计强调跨学科整合、基于角色的学习和动手探究。通过收集定量数据和定性反馈来评估学习效果和教学效果。结果:对于实验讲座,M-STEM组学生非常满意的比例明显高于传统组(79.3% vs 51.6%, P = 0.025)。M-STEM组的所有参与者都对学习设计表示认可,而传统学习组的参与者没有达成完全的共识。两组学生参与课程设计的意愿都相对较低(61.0%)。一项关于学生参与课程设计的调查显示,当面对复杂的临床问题时,学生最倾向于寻求医生和实验室技术员等专业人员的帮助。当被问及哪种跨学科整合可能提供更大的支持时,来自两个群体的学生主要选择了社会心理学。然而,存在显著差异:传统组学生选择经济学的比例显著高于M-STEM组(32.3% vs 10.3%, P = 0.04)。相比之下,M-STEM学生往往更注重整合关键学科,不愿涉及过多的学科。结论:M-STEM教学法可以激发学生的兴趣,促进多学科的融合,使学习者对疾病有更深入的了解,并制定有效的解决方案。