A Comparative Evaluation of Bonding Strength, Tensile Strength, and Microleakage of GC Hybrid Cement with Micro- and Nano-hydroxyapatite: An In Vitro Study.

Q3 Dentistry
Nasreen Banu, Veena Arali, Sowndarya Gunasekaran, Preethi Mahalakshmi
{"title":"A Comparative Evaluation of Bonding Strength, Tensile Strength, and Microleakage of GC Hybrid Cement with Micro- and Nano-hydroxyapatite: An <i>In Vitro</i> Study.","authors":"Nasreen Banu, Veena Arali, Sowndarya Gunasekaran, Preethi Mahalakshmi","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10005-3157","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim and background: </strong>The quest for optimal restorative material balancing function, biocompatibility, and durability is ongoing. Among these materials, glass ionomer cement (GIC) remains unique due to its fluoride release property and chemical adhesion to the tooth. To address its mechanical limitations, this study explores the incorporation of micro- and nano-hydroxyapatite (HA) into GC Hybrid to improve tensile strength, shear bond strength, and microleakage.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Thirty-three extracted human primary molars free of caries, defects, or previous restorations were collected and stored in saline. The control group (GC Hybrid), group 1 (GC Hybrid + micro-HA), and group 2 (GC Hybrid + nano-HA) underwent tensile strength, shear bond strength, and microleakage tests. For bonding strength, 27 teeth were prepared, treated, and tested for bonding failure using a universal testing machine. Tensile strength was evaluated on 27 cylindrical specimens using the diametral tensile strength (DTS) test. Microleakage was assessed on 6 molars restored with each material, analyzed under a stereomicroscope. Data were subjected to statistical analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Group 2 showed significantly higher tensile (8.46 ± 1.42, <i>p</i> 0.00) and shear bond strength (9.19 ± 1.82, <i>p</i> 0.01), followed by group 1, and least in the control group. Microscopic evaluation revealed no microleakage in group 2, reduced microleakage in group 1, and high in the control group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>GC Hybrid with nano-HA demonstrated highest DTS and shear bond strength with no microleakage. In contrast, the control group exhibited lowest values with high microleakage, while GC Hybrid with micro-HA showed moderate improvements, indicating nano-HA significantly enhances bonding and mechanical properties of GC Hybrid.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>Incorporation of nano-HA into GC Hybrid significantly improves the bonding and mechanical properties, reduces microleakage, and lowers the risk of secondary caries, making it superior to GC Hybrid alone or with micro-HA.</p><p><strong>How to cite this article: </strong>Banu N, Arali V, Gunasekaran S, <i>et al.</i> A Comparative Evaluation of Bonding Strength, Tensile Strength, and Microleakage of GC Hybrid Cement with Micro- and Nano-hydroxyapatite: An <i>In Vitro</i> Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2025;18(6):660-665.</p>","PeriodicalId":36045,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry","volume":"18 6","pages":"660-665"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12486480/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-3157","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim and background: The quest for optimal restorative material balancing function, biocompatibility, and durability is ongoing. Among these materials, glass ionomer cement (GIC) remains unique due to its fluoride release property and chemical adhesion to the tooth. To address its mechanical limitations, this study explores the incorporation of micro- and nano-hydroxyapatite (HA) into GC Hybrid to improve tensile strength, shear bond strength, and microleakage.

Materials and methods: Thirty-three extracted human primary molars free of caries, defects, or previous restorations were collected and stored in saline. The control group (GC Hybrid), group 1 (GC Hybrid + micro-HA), and group 2 (GC Hybrid + nano-HA) underwent tensile strength, shear bond strength, and microleakage tests. For bonding strength, 27 teeth were prepared, treated, and tested for bonding failure using a universal testing machine. Tensile strength was evaluated on 27 cylindrical specimens using the diametral tensile strength (DTS) test. Microleakage was assessed on 6 molars restored with each material, analyzed under a stereomicroscope. Data were subjected to statistical analysis.

Results: Group 2 showed significantly higher tensile (8.46 ± 1.42, p 0.00) and shear bond strength (9.19 ± 1.82, p 0.01), followed by group 1, and least in the control group. Microscopic evaluation revealed no microleakage in group 2, reduced microleakage in group 1, and high in the control group.

Conclusion: GC Hybrid with nano-HA demonstrated highest DTS and shear bond strength with no microleakage. In contrast, the control group exhibited lowest values with high microleakage, while GC Hybrid with micro-HA showed moderate improvements, indicating nano-HA significantly enhances bonding and mechanical properties of GC Hybrid.

Clinical significance: Incorporation of nano-HA into GC Hybrid significantly improves the bonding and mechanical properties, reduces microleakage, and lowers the risk of secondary caries, making it superior to GC Hybrid alone or with micro-HA.

How to cite this article: Banu N, Arali V, Gunasekaran S, et al. A Comparative Evaluation of Bonding Strength, Tensile Strength, and Microleakage of GC Hybrid Cement with Micro- and Nano-hydroxyapatite: An In Vitro Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2025;18(6):660-665.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

微羟基磷灰石和纳米羟基磷灰石GC混合水泥的粘结强度、抗拉强度和微渗漏的比较研究。
目的和背景:对最佳修复材料平衡功能、生物相容性和耐久性的追求正在进行中。在这些材料中,玻璃离子水门合剂(GIC)由于其氟化物释放特性和与牙齿的化学粘附性而保持独特。为了解决其力学局限性,本研究探讨了将微羟基磷灰石(HA)和纳米羟基磷灰石(HA)掺入GC Hybrid中,以提高抗拉强度、剪切强度和微泄漏。材料和方法:收集33颗无龋、无缺损、无既往修复体的拔牙,保存于生理盐水中。对照组(GC Hybrid)、组1 (GC Hybrid + micro-HA)、组2 (GC Hybrid + nano-HA)分别进行抗拉强度、剪切粘结强度、微泄漏测试。对于结合强度,27颗牙齿准备,处理,并使用万能试验机进行结合失败测试。采用直径拉伸强度(DTS)试验对27个圆柱形试样进行了拉伸强度评估。在体视显微镜下观察6颗修复磨牙的微渗漏情况。对数据进行统计分析。结果:组2抗拉强度(8.46±1.42,p 0.00)和剪切强度(9.19±1.82,p 0.01)显著高于组1,组1次之,对照组最低。镜检结果显示,2组无微漏,1组微漏减少,对照组微漏高。结论:GC复合物具有较高的DTS和剪切强度,无微渗漏。相比之下,对照组的微漏率最低,微漏率较高,而添加了微ha的GC Hybrid的微漏率略有改善,说明纳米ha显著提高了GC Hybrid的粘接性能和力学性能。临床意义:将纳米ha掺入GC Hybrid中,可显著改善粘接和力学性能,减少微渗漏,降低继发龋病风险,优于单独掺入GC Hybrid或与微ha掺入GC Hybrid。如何引用本文:Banu N, Arali V, Gunasekaran S等。微羟基磷灰石和纳米羟基磷灰石GC混合水泥的粘结强度、抗拉强度和微渗漏的比较研究。中华临床儿科杂志,2015;18(6):660-665。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
135
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信