Intra-rater reliability, expertise and justifications for the American society of anesthesiologists physical status classification in dogs.

IF 1.9 2区 农林科学 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Henrique E de Almeida Lupiano, Erik H Hofmeister, Pen-Ting Liao
{"title":"Intra-rater reliability, expertise and justifications for the American society of anesthesiologists physical status classification in dogs.","authors":"Henrique E de Almeida Lupiano, Erik H Hofmeister, Pen-Ting Liao","doi":"10.1016/j.vaa.2025.09.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purposes of this study were to document intra-rater reliability in assigning American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification System (ASA) status, to compare Cochran-Weiss-Shanteau (CWS) scores between anesthetists with varying levels of external validation, and to document the explanations given for assigning certain ASA statuses.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Prospective case series.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>A group of 29 anesthetists.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Anesthetists were presented with 25 hypothetical cases in two stages and asked to provide an ASA status as well as an explanation. Intra-rater reliability was calculated using the single-measure averaged intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The CWS index was calculated and quantifies expertise by assessing discrimination and consistency, where higher scores indicate superior judgment. Explanations for assignment of ASA status were analyzed by inductive coding by two investigators.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The intra-rater ICC for all raters who completed Stage 1 and 2 was 0.80 (95% confidence interval 0.76-0.83, n = 17), 0.80 (0.74-0.86, n = 6) for Diplomates, 0.76 (0.68-0.82, n = 5) for residents and 0.86 (0.81-0.90, n = 6) for veterinary technicians. CWS ranged from 2.0 to 6.1, with the same median score of 3.1 for Diplomates, residents and technicians. In cases with the lowest agreement, the themes identified included disagreement on the degree of physiological compensation (e.g. tachycardia) and the effects of mild dehydration, an asymptomatic heart murmur, patients with brachycephalic airway syndrome and hypoproteinemia.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and clinical relevance: </strong>Intra-rater reliability was high and similar regardless of level of external validation (i.e. technician vs. resident versus Diplomate). Using the CWS for ASA status assignment did not differentiate technicians, residents and Diplomates, although some individuals had relatively higher CWS, suggesting greater expertise in ASA status assignment. Disagreements exist in classifying conditions like brachycephalic airway syndrome and asymptomatic heart murmurs.</p>","PeriodicalId":23626,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary anaesthesia and analgesia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary anaesthesia and analgesia","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaa.2025.09.003","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The purposes of this study were to document intra-rater reliability in assigning American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification System (ASA) status, to compare Cochran-Weiss-Shanteau (CWS) scores between anesthetists with varying levels of external validation, and to document the explanations given for assigning certain ASA statuses.

Study design: Prospective case series.

Subjects: A group of 29 anesthetists.

Methods: Anesthetists were presented with 25 hypothetical cases in two stages and asked to provide an ASA status as well as an explanation. Intra-rater reliability was calculated using the single-measure averaged intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The CWS index was calculated and quantifies expertise by assessing discrimination and consistency, where higher scores indicate superior judgment. Explanations for assignment of ASA status were analyzed by inductive coding by two investigators.

Results: The intra-rater ICC for all raters who completed Stage 1 and 2 was 0.80 (95% confidence interval 0.76-0.83, n = 17), 0.80 (0.74-0.86, n = 6) for Diplomates, 0.76 (0.68-0.82, n = 5) for residents and 0.86 (0.81-0.90, n = 6) for veterinary technicians. CWS ranged from 2.0 to 6.1, with the same median score of 3.1 for Diplomates, residents and technicians. In cases with the lowest agreement, the themes identified included disagreement on the degree of physiological compensation (e.g. tachycardia) and the effects of mild dehydration, an asymptomatic heart murmur, patients with brachycephalic airway syndrome and hypoproteinemia.

Conclusions and clinical relevance: Intra-rater reliability was high and similar regardless of level of external validation (i.e. technician vs. resident versus Diplomate). Using the CWS for ASA status assignment did not differentiate technicians, residents and Diplomates, although some individuals had relatively higher CWS, suggesting greater expertise in ASA status assignment. Disagreements exist in classifying conditions like brachycephalic airway syndrome and asymptomatic heart murmurs.

美国麻醉师协会犬类生理状态分类的内部可靠性、专业知识和合理性。
目的:本研究的目的是记录评定美国麻醉师协会身体状态分类系统(ASA)状态时的内部信度,比较具有不同外部验证水平的麻醉师之间的Cochran-Weiss-Shanteau (CWS)评分,并记录评定某些ASA状态的解释。研究设计:前瞻性病例系列。研究对象:麻醉医师29人。方法:麻醉医师分两个阶段对25例患者进行假设,并要求其提供ASA状态和解释。使用单测量平均类内相关系数(ICC)计算组内信度。计算CWS指数,并通过评估歧视和一致性来量化专业知识,其中得分越高表明判断力越好。两位研究者通过归纳编码分析了ASA状态分配的解释。结果:完成第一阶段和第二阶段的所有评分者的评分者内部ICC为0.80(95%置信区间0.76-0.83,n = 17),文凭为0.80 (0.74-0.86,n = 6),居民为0.76 (0.68-0.82,n = 5),兽医技师为0.86 (0.81-0.90,n = 6)。CWS介乎2.0至6.1,而外交官、居民及技术人员的得分中位数均为3.1。在一致性最低的病例中,确定的主题包括生理代偿程度(如心动过速)和轻度脱水、无症状心脏杂音、短头气道综合征和低蛋白血症患者的影响。结论和临床相关性:无论外部验证水平如何(即技术人员、住院医生和专科医生),内部信度都很高且相似。使用CWS进行ASA身份分配并没有区分技师、居民和外交家,尽管有些人的CWS相对较高,表明他们在ASA身份分配方面更专业。对短头气道综合征和无症状心杂音的分类存在分歧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Veterinary anaesthesia and analgesia
Veterinary anaesthesia and analgesia 农林科学-兽医学
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
17.60%
发文量
91
审稿时长
97 days
期刊介绍: Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia is the official journal of the Association of Veterinary Anaesthetists, the American College of Veterinary Anesthesia and Analgesia and the European College of Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia. Its purpose is the publication of original, peer reviewed articles covering all branches of anaesthesia and the relief of pain in animals. Articles concerned with the following subjects related to anaesthesia and analgesia are also welcome: the basic sciences; pathophysiology of disease as it relates to anaesthetic management equipment intensive care chemical restraint of animals including laboratory animals, wildlife and exotic animals welfare issues associated with pain and distress education in veterinary anaesthesia and analgesia. Review articles, special articles, and historical notes will also be published, along with editorials, case reports in the form of letters to the editor, and book reviews. There is also an active correspondence section.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信