Henrique E de Almeida Lupiano, Erik H Hofmeister, Pen-Ting Liao
{"title":"Intra-rater reliability, expertise and justifications for the American society of anesthesiologists physical status classification in dogs.","authors":"Henrique E de Almeida Lupiano, Erik H Hofmeister, Pen-Ting Liao","doi":"10.1016/j.vaa.2025.09.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purposes of this study were to document intra-rater reliability in assigning American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification System (ASA) status, to compare Cochran-Weiss-Shanteau (CWS) scores between anesthetists with varying levels of external validation, and to document the explanations given for assigning certain ASA statuses.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Prospective case series.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>A group of 29 anesthetists.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Anesthetists were presented with 25 hypothetical cases in two stages and asked to provide an ASA status as well as an explanation. Intra-rater reliability was calculated using the single-measure averaged intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The CWS index was calculated and quantifies expertise by assessing discrimination and consistency, where higher scores indicate superior judgment. Explanations for assignment of ASA status were analyzed by inductive coding by two investigators.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The intra-rater ICC for all raters who completed Stage 1 and 2 was 0.80 (95% confidence interval 0.76-0.83, n = 17), 0.80 (0.74-0.86, n = 6) for Diplomates, 0.76 (0.68-0.82, n = 5) for residents and 0.86 (0.81-0.90, n = 6) for veterinary technicians. CWS ranged from 2.0 to 6.1, with the same median score of 3.1 for Diplomates, residents and technicians. In cases with the lowest agreement, the themes identified included disagreement on the degree of physiological compensation (e.g. tachycardia) and the effects of mild dehydration, an asymptomatic heart murmur, patients with brachycephalic airway syndrome and hypoproteinemia.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and clinical relevance: </strong>Intra-rater reliability was high and similar regardless of level of external validation (i.e. technician vs. resident versus Diplomate). Using the CWS for ASA status assignment did not differentiate technicians, residents and Diplomates, although some individuals had relatively higher CWS, suggesting greater expertise in ASA status assignment. Disagreements exist in classifying conditions like brachycephalic airway syndrome and asymptomatic heart murmurs.</p>","PeriodicalId":23626,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary anaesthesia and analgesia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary anaesthesia and analgesia","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaa.2025.09.003","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: The purposes of this study were to document intra-rater reliability in assigning American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification System (ASA) status, to compare Cochran-Weiss-Shanteau (CWS) scores between anesthetists with varying levels of external validation, and to document the explanations given for assigning certain ASA statuses.
Study design: Prospective case series.
Subjects: A group of 29 anesthetists.
Methods: Anesthetists were presented with 25 hypothetical cases in two stages and asked to provide an ASA status as well as an explanation. Intra-rater reliability was calculated using the single-measure averaged intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The CWS index was calculated and quantifies expertise by assessing discrimination and consistency, where higher scores indicate superior judgment. Explanations for assignment of ASA status were analyzed by inductive coding by two investigators.
Results: The intra-rater ICC for all raters who completed Stage 1 and 2 was 0.80 (95% confidence interval 0.76-0.83, n = 17), 0.80 (0.74-0.86, n = 6) for Diplomates, 0.76 (0.68-0.82, n = 5) for residents and 0.86 (0.81-0.90, n = 6) for veterinary technicians. CWS ranged from 2.0 to 6.1, with the same median score of 3.1 for Diplomates, residents and technicians. In cases with the lowest agreement, the themes identified included disagreement on the degree of physiological compensation (e.g. tachycardia) and the effects of mild dehydration, an asymptomatic heart murmur, patients with brachycephalic airway syndrome and hypoproteinemia.
Conclusions and clinical relevance: Intra-rater reliability was high and similar regardless of level of external validation (i.e. technician vs. resident versus Diplomate). Using the CWS for ASA status assignment did not differentiate technicians, residents and Diplomates, although some individuals had relatively higher CWS, suggesting greater expertise in ASA status assignment. Disagreements exist in classifying conditions like brachycephalic airway syndrome and asymptomatic heart murmurs.
期刊介绍:
Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia is the official journal of the Association of Veterinary Anaesthetists, the American College of Veterinary Anesthesia and Analgesia and the European College of Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia. Its purpose is the publication of original, peer reviewed articles covering all branches of anaesthesia and the relief of pain in animals. Articles concerned with the following subjects related to anaesthesia and analgesia are also welcome:
the basic sciences;
pathophysiology of disease as it relates to anaesthetic management
equipment
intensive care
chemical restraint of animals including laboratory animals, wildlife and exotic animals
welfare issues associated with pain and distress
education in veterinary anaesthesia and analgesia.
Review articles, special articles, and historical notes will also be published, along with editorials, case reports in the form of letters to the editor, and book reviews. There is also an active correspondence section.