Comparison of Retention Rates of Pit and Fissure Sealants Using Flowable Composite and Moisture-tolerant Resin-based Sealant: An In Vivo Study.

Q3 Dentistry
Durga Satya Sai Kamakshi Amruthavarshini Adapa, Ambili Ayilliath, Rena Ephraim, M U Mridhul, Ramnesh Parikkal, Fazila Azhikoden
{"title":"Comparison of Retention Rates of Pit and Fissure Sealants Using Flowable Composite and Moisture-tolerant Resin-based Sealant: An <i>In Vivo</i> Study.","authors":"Durga Satya Sai Kamakshi Amruthavarshini Adapa, Ambili Ayilliath, Rena Ephraim, M U Mridhul, Ramnesh Parikkal, Fazila Azhikoden","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10005-3176","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims and background: </strong>To compare and evaluate the retention rate of flowable composite and moisture-tolerant pit and fissure sealant on pits and fissures of molars.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A split-mouth design was chosen on 58 pediatric patients on their mandibular first permanent molars. In group I [Embrace WetBond sealant (EWS) group], the right lower permanent first molar was sealed. In group II [Estelite Flowable Composite (EFC) group], the left lower permanent first molar was treated. After application, clinical evaluation was done at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. Postoperatively, the teeth were clinically evaluated for retention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The complete retention rates of the EWS and EFC groups in our study at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months were as follows: EWS group-100%, 100%, 98.3%, 81%; EFC group-67.2%, 46.6%, 32.2%, 10.3%. The Chi-square test showed a statistically significant association between the retention rates of EWS and EFC at 12 months, with a Chi-square value of 63.127 and a <i>p</i>-value of < 0.001.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Embrace WetBond (EWS) sealant group showed better retention over a period of time when compared to that of EFC.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>Composite materials with good retentive properties and which have the added advantage of higher strength will be able to withstand masticatory forces and hence prevent their loss from the tooth surfaces.</p><p><strong>How to cite this article: </strong>Adapa DSSK A, Ayilliath A, Ephraim R, <i>et al.</i> Comparison of Retention Rates of Pit and Fissure Sealants Using Flowable Composite and Moisture-tolerant Resin-based Sealant: An <i>In Vivo</i> Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2025;18(6):709-718.</p>","PeriodicalId":36045,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry","volume":"18 6","pages":"709-718"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12486481/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-3176","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims and background: To compare and evaluate the retention rate of flowable composite and moisture-tolerant pit and fissure sealant on pits and fissures of molars.

Materials and methods: A split-mouth design was chosen on 58 pediatric patients on their mandibular first permanent molars. In group I [Embrace WetBond sealant (EWS) group], the right lower permanent first molar was sealed. In group II [Estelite Flowable Composite (EFC) group], the left lower permanent first molar was treated. After application, clinical evaluation was done at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. Postoperatively, the teeth were clinically evaluated for retention.

Results: The complete retention rates of the EWS and EFC groups in our study at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months were as follows: EWS group-100%, 100%, 98.3%, 81%; EFC group-67.2%, 46.6%, 32.2%, 10.3%. The Chi-square test showed a statistically significant association between the retention rates of EWS and EFC at 12 months, with a Chi-square value of 63.127 and a p-value of < 0.001.

Conclusion: The Embrace WetBond (EWS) sealant group showed better retention over a period of time when compared to that of EFC.

Clinical significance: Composite materials with good retentive properties and which have the added advantage of higher strength will be able to withstand masticatory forces and hence prevent their loss from the tooth surfaces.

How to cite this article: Adapa DSSK A, Ayilliath A, Ephraim R, et al. Comparison of Retention Rates of Pit and Fissure Sealants Using Flowable Composite and Moisture-tolerant Resin-based Sealant: An In Vivo Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2025;18(6):709-718.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

可流动复合材料和耐湿树脂基密封胶在坑和裂隙密封胶中保留率的比较:体内研究。
目的与背景:比较和评价可流动复合材料与耐湿型牙槽裂隙密封剂在磨牙牙槽裂隙上的保留率。材料与方法:对58例儿童患者的下颌第一恒磨牙采用裂口设计。第一组(Embrace WetBond sealant, EWS)封闭右下恒牙第一磨牙。II组[Estelite可流动复合材料(EFC)组]治疗左下恒牙第一磨牙。应用后分别于3、6、9、12个月进行临床评价。术后,临床评估牙的固位情况。结果:本研究EWS组和EFC组在3、6、9、12个月的完全保留率分别为:EWS组100%、100%、98.3%、81%;EFC组67.2%,46.6%,32.2%,10.3%。卡方检验显示,EWS和EFC在12个月时的保留率有统计学意义,卡方值为63.127,p值< 0.001。结论:与EFC相比,Embrace WetBond (EWS)密封剂组在一段时间内具有更好的固位性。临床意义:复合材料具有良好的固位性能,并且具有较高的强度,可以承受咀嚼力,从而防止其从牙面脱落。如何引用本文:Adapa DSSK A, Ayilliath A, Ephraim R等。可流动复合材料和耐湿树脂基密封胶在坑和裂隙密封胶中保留率的比较:体内研究。中华临床儿科杂志,2015;18(6):709-718。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
135
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信