Construction and verification of reliability and validity of the communication skill assessment scale in cancer palliative care for healthcare staff.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Lanying Qiu, Xi Yang, Yingjun Ye, Guanmian Liang, Jianwen Hou, Shuai Han, Xiaoxue Wen, Xiaoying Shen, Yitong Guo, Haoyang Li, Dan Fan, Shuping Xie, Xiaowei Fu
{"title":"Construction and verification of reliability and validity of the communication skill assessment scale in cancer palliative care for healthcare staff.","authors":"Lanying Qiu, Xi Yang, Yingjun Ye, Guanmian Liang, Jianwen Hou, Shuai Han, Xiaoxue Wen, Xiaoying Shen, Yitong Guo, Haoyang Li, Dan Fan, Shuping Xie, Xiaowei Fu","doi":"10.1186/s12957-025-04002-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to construct and test the reliability and validity of the communication skill assessment scale in cancer palliative care for healthcare staff.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The concept of communication skills was defined by the literature review. The palliative care communication skill assessment scale was developed through literature analysis, an open questionnaire survey, and expert correspondence. A total of 485 healthcare staff, including doctors and nurses, who worked in the medical oncology department of a Grade-A oncology hospital in Zhejiang Province were selected to screen the items of the scale and test their reliability and validity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 39 items in the final version of the palliative care communication skill assessment scale for healthcare staff. Through exploratory factor analysis, six common factors were extracted, and the cumulative variance contribution rate was 80.47%. Item content validity index (CVI) ranged from 0.78 to 1.00, and the overall CVI of the scale was 0.91. The internal correlation test showed that the correlation coefficient of each dimension of the scale with a total score was 0.59-0.76 (p < 0.05), and the inter-dimension correlation coefficient was 0.46-0.51 (p < 0.05). The Kronbach coefficient of the aggregate table was 0.928. The retest reliability was 0.89. The broken half reliability was 0.84.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The palliative care communication skill assessment scale we constructed has good reliability and validity, and it can be used to evaluate the communication skills of healthcare staff during palliative care.</p>","PeriodicalId":23856,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Surgical Oncology","volume":"23 1","pages":"358"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12492915/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-025-04002-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: We aimed to construct and test the reliability and validity of the communication skill assessment scale in cancer palliative care for healthcare staff.

Methods: The concept of communication skills was defined by the literature review. The palliative care communication skill assessment scale was developed through literature analysis, an open questionnaire survey, and expert correspondence. A total of 485 healthcare staff, including doctors and nurses, who worked in the medical oncology department of a Grade-A oncology hospital in Zhejiang Province were selected to screen the items of the scale and test their reliability and validity.

Results: There were 39 items in the final version of the palliative care communication skill assessment scale for healthcare staff. Through exploratory factor analysis, six common factors were extracted, and the cumulative variance contribution rate was 80.47%. Item content validity index (CVI) ranged from 0.78 to 1.00, and the overall CVI of the scale was 0.91. The internal correlation test showed that the correlation coefficient of each dimension of the scale with a total score was 0.59-0.76 (p < 0.05), and the inter-dimension correlation coefficient was 0.46-0.51 (p < 0.05). The Kronbach coefficient of the aggregate table was 0.928. The retest reliability was 0.89. The broken half reliability was 0.84.

Conclusion: The palliative care communication skill assessment scale we constructed has good reliability and validity, and it can be used to evaluate the communication skills of healthcare staff during palliative care.

癌症姑息治疗医护人员沟通技巧评估量表的编制及信效度验证。
目的:编制癌症姑息治疗医护人员沟通技巧评估量表,并对其信度和效度进行检验。方法:通过文献回顾对沟通技巧的概念进行界定。通过文献分析、开放式问卷调查、专家函询等方法编制缓和疗护沟通技巧评估量表。选取浙江省某肿瘤三级医院肿瘤内科的485名医护人员,包括医生和护士,对量表的项目进行筛选,并对其信度和效度进行检验。结果:终版《医护人员姑息治疗沟通技巧评定量表》共包含39个项目。通过探索性因子分析,提取出6个共同因子,累积方差贡献率为80.47%。项目内容效度指数(CVI)范围为0.78 ~ 1.00,量表总体CVI为0.91。内相关检验显示,量表各维度与总分的相关系数为0.59 ~ 0.76 (p)。结论:我们构建的姑息治疗沟通技巧评估量表具有良好的信度和效度,可用于评估医护人员在姑息治疗过程中的沟通技巧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
15.60%
发文量
362
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: World Journal of Surgical Oncology publishes articles related to surgical oncology and its allied subjects, such as epidemiology, cancer research, biomarkers, prevention, pathology, radiology, cancer treatment, clinical trials, multimodality treatment and molecular biology. Emphasis is placed on original research articles. The journal also publishes significant clinical case reports, as well as balanced and timely reviews on selected topics. Oncology is a multidisciplinary super-speciality of which surgical oncology forms an integral component, especially with solid tumors. Surgical oncologists around the world are involved in research extending from detecting the mechanisms underlying the causation of cancer, to its treatment and prevention. The role of a surgical oncologist extends across the whole continuum of care. With continued developments in diagnosis and treatment, the role of a surgical oncologist is ever-changing. Hence, World Journal of Surgical Oncology aims to keep readers abreast with latest developments that will ultimately influence the work of surgical oncologists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信