How Many Blastocysts Are Needed for PGT-A to Benefit RPL Patients? A 7-Year Retrospective Cohort Study.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Jia Liao, Shiheng Zhu, Jinghan Wang, Xinyi Xue, Chunzi Lyu, Qian Zhang, Junhao Yan, Tianxiang Ni
{"title":"How Many Blastocysts Are Needed for PGT-A to Benefit RPL Patients? A 7-Year Retrospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Jia Liao, Shiheng Zhu, Jinghan Wang, Xinyi Xue, Chunzi Lyu, Qian Zhang, Junhao Yan, Tianxiang Ni","doi":"10.1007/s43032-025-01978-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The efficacy of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) in couples with unexplained recurrent pregnancy loss (uRPL) may vary according to the number of good-quality blastocysts available. This study is to determine whether PGT-A could improve the cumulative live birth rate (CLBR) among couples experiencing uRPL as the number of high-quality blastocysts increases. A retrospective study involving 1073 couples with uRPL was conducted at a university-affiliated reproductive center. Patients were divided into two groups: 813 participants who underwent PGT-A and 260 participants who underwent conventional in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI). A stratified analysis was conducted, which categorized the female participants into three subgroups based on the number of high-quality blastocysts: 1-3, 4-6, and ≥ 7. A binary logistic regression model was used to evaluate the associations between the number of high-quality blastocysts and the cumulative pregnancy outcomes. Among uRPL patients undergoing PGT-A or IVF/ICSI, there were respectively 421 vs. 129 with 1-3 blastocysts, 252 vs. 69 with 4-6 blastocysts, and 140 vs. 62 with ≥ 7 blastocysts. In 1-3 blastocysts subgroup, CLBR was 23.52% after PGT-A vs. 33.33% after IVF/ICSI (adjusted OR 1.005, 95% CI 0.604-1.674, p = 0.984). In 4-6 blastocysts subgroup, CLBR was 53.17% after PGT-A vs. 75.36% after IVF/ICSI (adjusted OR 0.398, 95% CI 0.197-0.802, p = 0.010). In ≥ 7 blastocysts subgroup, CLBR was 73.57% after PGT-A vs. 66.13% after IVF/ICSI (adjusted OR 1.660, 95% CI 0.729-3.799, p = 0.227). In these three subgroups, clinical pregnancy loss rates were all similar between the two treatment methods. In women with uRPL, PGT-A did not improve CLBR, irrespective of the number of high-quality blastocysts available. Routine use of PGT-A in this population is therefore not recommended. Future high-quality randomized controlled trials may better define its appropriate indications.</p>","PeriodicalId":20920,"journal":{"name":"Reproductive Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reproductive Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43032-025-01978-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The efficacy of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) in couples with unexplained recurrent pregnancy loss (uRPL) may vary according to the number of good-quality blastocysts available. This study is to determine whether PGT-A could improve the cumulative live birth rate (CLBR) among couples experiencing uRPL as the number of high-quality blastocysts increases. A retrospective study involving 1073 couples with uRPL was conducted at a university-affiliated reproductive center. Patients were divided into two groups: 813 participants who underwent PGT-A and 260 participants who underwent conventional in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI). A stratified analysis was conducted, which categorized the female participants into three subgroups based on the number of high-quality blastocysts: 1-3, 4-6, and ≥ 7. A binary logistic regression model was used to evaluate the associations between the number of high-quality blastocysts and the cumulative pregnancy outcomes. Among uRPL patients undergoing PGT-A or IVF/ICSI, there were respectively 421 vs. 129 with 1-3 blastocysts, 252 vs. 69 with 4-6 blastocysts, and 140 vs. 62 with ≥ 7 blastocysts. In 1-3 blastocysts subgroup, CLBR was 23.52% after PGT-A vs. 33.33% after IVF/ICSI (adjusted OR 1.005, 95% CI 0.604-1.674, p = 0.984). In 4-6 blastocysts subgroup, CLBR was 53.17% after PGT-A vs. 75.36% after IVF/ICSI (adjusted OR 0.398, 95% CI 0.197-0.802, p = 0.010). In ≥ 7 blastocysts subgroup, CLBR was 73.57% after PGT-A vs. 66.13% after IVF/ICSI (adjusted OR 1.660, 95% CI 0.729-3.799, p = 0.227). In these three subgroups, clinical pregnancy loss rates were all similar between the two treatment methods. In women with uRPL, PGT-A did not improve CLBR, irrespective of the number of high-quality blastocysts available. Routine use of PGT-A in this population is therefore not recommended. Future high-quality randomized controlled trials may better define its appropriate indications.

PGT-A需要多少囊胚才能使RPL患者受益?一项7年回顾性队列研究。
不明原因复发性妊娠丢失(uRPL)夫妇的非整倍体(PGT-A)着床前基因检测的效果可能因可获得的优质囊胚数量而异。本研究旨在确定PGT-A是否可以随着高质量囊胚数量的增加而提高uRPL夫妇的累积活产率(CLBR)。在一所大学附属生殖中心进行了一项涉及1073对uRPL夫妇的回顾性研究。患者被分为两组:813名接受PGT-A的参与者和260名接受常规体外受精/胞浆内单精子注射(IVF/ICSI)的参与者。对女性受试者进行分层分析,根据优质囊胚数量将其分为3个亚组:1-3、4-6和≥7个。采用二元logistic回归模型评估高质量囊胚数量与累积妊娠结局之间的关系。在接受PGT-A或IVF/ICSI的uRPL患者中,1-3囊胚者分别为421 vs 129, 4-6囊胚者分别为252 vs 69,囊胚≥7囊胚者分别为140 vs 62。在1-3囊胚亚组中,PGT-A组CLBR为23.52%,IVF/ICSI组为33.33%(校正后比值为1.005,95% CI 0.604-1.674, p = 0.984)。在4-6囊胚亚组中,PGT-A后CLBR为53.17%,IVF/ICSI后为75.36%(校正OR 0.398, 95% CI 0.197-0.802, p = 0.010)。在囊胚≥7个亚组中,PGT-A后CLBR为73.57%,IVF/ICSI后CLBR为66.13%(校正OR 1.660, 95% CI 0.729-3.799, p = 0.227)。在这三个亚组中,两种治疗方法的临床流产率均相似。在患有uRPL的女性中,无论可用的高质量囊胚数量如何,PGT-A都不能改善CLBR。因此,不建议在这一人群中常规使用PGT-A。未来的高质量随机对照试验可能会更好地确定其合适的适应症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Reproductive Sciences
Reproductive Sciences 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
3.40%
发文量
322
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Reproductive Sciences (RS) is a peer-reviewed, monthly journal publishing original research and reviews in obstetrics and gynecology. RS is multi-disciplinary and includes research in basic reproductive biology and medicine, maternal-fetal medicine, obstetrics, gynecology, reproductive endocrinology, urogynecology, fertility/infertility, embryology, gynecologic/reproductive oncology, developmental biology, stem cell research, molecular/cellular biology and other related fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信