Accepting to Participate in an Early-Phase Clinical Trial in Oncology: A Qualitative Study on the Patients' Experiences, Understanding, and Inner Motivations.

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Estelle Guerdoux, Anne Stoebner, Louise Coutant, Marion Zamith-Chavant, Sylvie Dolbeault, Jessica Martinez, Marta Jarlier, Diego Tosi
{"title":"Accepting to Participate in an Early-Phase Clinical Trial in Oncology: A Qualitative Study on the Patients' Experiences, Understanding, and Inner Motivations.","authors":"Estelle Guerdoux, Anne Stoebner, Louise Coutant, Marion Zamith-Chavant, Sylvie Dolbeault, Jessica Martinez, Marta Jarlier, Diego Tosi","doi":"10.1002/pon.70291","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The clinical trial landscape in oncology has evolved, with shifting endpoints and increased emphasis on early-phase clinical trials (EPCTs) across European centers.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study aimed to update knowledge on the experiences of patients enrolling in EPCTs, focusing on the individual/contextual factors influencing decision-making, and how to improve ethical and psycho-oncological support.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This qualitative single-center study was part of a broader multicenter project. Twenty-five patients with locally advanced or metastatic solid cancer, for whom standard therapies had failed, were interviewed face-to-face, at a French EPCT center. A reflexive thematic analysis of the transcripts was conducted, following Braun and Clarke's six-step approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four overarching themes emerged: \"Experiencing the EPCT proposal\", \"Accepting the EPCT\", \"Ambivalent feelings\" and \"Coping strategies\", and several subthemes. Decisions were often made quickly in crisis situations and perceived as the only option. While patients reported receiving adequate information, their understanding of the trial's aims varied. Emotional distress and time pressure likely hindered full comprehension. Patients relied on trust in clinicians and reframed trial participation as a constructive goal, drawing on coping strategies to manage uncertainty and restore a sense of coherence.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients were neither delusional nor misinformed, but their decisions were shaped by complex emotional and relational dynamics. The perception of being well informed does not ensure true understanding, especially in high-stress contexts. Ambivalent emotions, tensions between expectations and hopes, and constrained choices should be considered when tailoring supportive care. Evidence-based strategies are needed to enhance communication and shared decision-making in EPCT settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":20779,"journal":{"name":"Psycho‐Oncology","volume":"34 10","pages":"e70291"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12491123/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psycho‐Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.70291","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The clinical trial landscape in oncology has evolved, with shifting endpoints and increased emphasis on early-phase clinical trials (EPCTs) across European centers.

Aims: This study aimed to update knowledge on the experiences of patients enrolling in EPCTs, focusing on the individual/contextual factors influencing decision-making, and how to improve ethical and psycho-oncological support.

Methods: This qualitative single-center study was part of a broader multicenter project. Twenty-five patients with locally advanced or metastatic solid cancer, for whom standard therapies had failed, were interviewed face-to-face, at a French EPCT center. A reflexive thematic analysis of the transcripts was conducted, following Braun and Clarke's six-step approach.

Results: Four overarching themes emerged: "Experiencing the EPCT proposal", "Accepting the EPCT", "Ambivalent feelings" and "Coping strategies", and several subthemes. Decisions were often made quickly in crisis situations and perceived as the only option. While patients reported receiving adequate information, their understanding of the trial's aims varied. Emotional distress and time pressure likely hindered full comprehension. Patients relied on trust in clinicians and reframed trial participation as a constructive goal, drawing on coping strategies to manage uncertainty and restore a sense of coherence.

Conclusions: Patients were neither delusional nor misinformed, but their decisions were shaped by complex emotional and relational dynamics. The perception of being well informed does not ensure true understanding, especially in high-stress contexts. Ambivalent emotions, tensions between expectations and hopes, and constrained choices should be considered when tailoring supportive care. Evidence-based strategies are needed to enhance communication and shared decision-making in EPCT settings.

Abstract Image

接受参加肿瘤早期临床试验:对患者经历、理解和内在动机的定性研究。
背景:肿瘤学的临床试验前景已经发生了变化,终点不断变化,欧洲中心越来越重视早期临床试验(epct)。目的:本研究旨在更新患者参加epct的经验,重点关注影响决策的个体/环境因素,以及如何改善伦理和心理肿瘤支持。方法:本定性单中心研究是一个更广泛的多中心项目的一部分。25例局部晚期或转移性实体癌患者,标准治疗无效,在法国EPCT中心进行了面对面的访谈。遵循Braun和Clarke的六步方法,对这些记录进行了反思性主题分析。结果:出现了“体验EPCT提议”、“接受EPCT”、“矛盾感受”和“应对策略”四个总体主题,以及几个副主题。在危机情况下,决策往往很快做出,并被视为唯一的选择。虽然患者报告获得了足够的信息,但他们对试验目的的理解各不相同。情绪困扰和时间压力可能阻碍了完全理解。患者依赖于对临床医生的信任,并将参与试验重新定义为一个建设性的目标,利用应对策略来管理不确定性并恢复一致性。结论:患者既没有妄想,也没有被误导,但他们的决定是由复杂的情感和关系动态形成的。消息灵通的感觉并不能确保真正的理解,尤其是在高压环境下。在定制支持性护理时,应考虑到矛盾的情绪、期望与希望之间的紧张关系以及受限的选择。需要循证战略来加强EPCT环境中的沟通和共同决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psycho‐Oncology
Psycho‐Oncology 医学-心理学
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
8.30%
发文量
220
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Psycho-Oncology is concerned with the psychological, social, behavioral, and ethical aspects of cancer. This subspeciality addresses the two major psychological dimensions of cancer: the psychological responses of patients to cancer at all stages of the disease, and that of their families and caretakers; and the psychological, behavioral and social factors that may influence the disease process. Psycho-oncology is an area of multi-disciplinary interest and has boundaries with the major specialities in oncology: the clinical disciplines (surgery, medicine, pediatrics, radiotherapy), epidemiology, immunology, endocrinology, biology, pathology, bioethics, palliative care, rehabilitation medicine, clinical trials research and decision making, as well as psychiatry and psychology. This international journal is published twelve times a year and will consider contributions to research of clinical and theoretical interest. Topics covered are wide-ranging and relate to the psychosocial aspects of cancer and AIDS-related tumors, including: epidemiology, quality of life, palliative and supportive care, psychiatry, psychology, sociology, social work, nursing and educational issues. Special reviews are offered from time to time. There is a section reviewing recently published books. A society news section is available for the dissemination of information relating to meetings, conferences and other society-related topics. Summary proceedings of important national and international symposia falling within the aims of the journal are presented.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信