Jessica C Goodwin, Monica C Amarante, Mayuri S Patel, Prishae Wilson, Tara Brigham, Mallory J Raymond
{"title":"Impact of Adult Cochlear Implantation on Communication Partner Disability and Quality of Life: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Jessica C Goodwin, Monica C Amarante, Mayuri S Patel, Prishae Wilson, Tara Brigham, Mallory J Raymond","doi":"10.1097/MAO.0000000000004633","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Assess the impact of adult cochlear implantation on the disability and quality of life (QOL) of communication partners (CP) of cochlear implant (CI) recipients.</p><p><strong>Databases reviewed: </strong>PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, Science Citation Index Expanded, and Emerging Sources Citation Index were searched.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was reported following the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Articles included reported on disability or QOL measures of CP of adult CI recipients. Study selection included retrospective, prospective, and randomized controlled studies in English language. Three reviewers independently screened studies for inclusion, extracted data, and evaluated risk of bias. Outcomes included both qualitative and quantitative pre-CI and post-CI measures of CP disability or QOL.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1615 screened articles, 9 studies utilizing quantitative and qualitative measures with 504 CP met inclusion criteria. Four of 6 studies assessing only post-CI CP QOL, demonstrated self-reported improvement, while one demonstrated worse CP QOL compared with the general population and one identified CP and CI recipient qualities that correlated with CP QOL scores. Two studies assessing pre-CI to post-CI CP QOL also reported improvements. One study assessing only pre-CI CP QOL suggested that CPs had worse QOL than normal hearing controls. Duration of CI recipient hearing loss did not impact CP QOL in any study.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Though homogenous data on the QOL of CPs of CI recipients and the relationship between CI recipient and CP factors is limited, studies suggest that CPs of CI recipients may have worse QOL than the general population but, cochlear implantation may improve CP QOL.</p>","PeriodicalId":19732,"journal":{"name":"Otology & Neurotology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Otology & Neurotology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000004633","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: Assess the impact of adult cochlear implantation on the disability and quality of life (QOL) of communication partners (CP) of cochlear implant (CI) recipients.
Databases reviewed: PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, Science Citation Index Expanded, and Emerging Sources Citation Index were searched.
Methods: This study was reported following the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Articles included reported on disability or QOL measures of CP of adult CI recipients. Study selection included retrospective, prospective, and randomized controlled studies in English language. Three reviewers independently screened studies for inclusion, extracted data, and evaluated risk of bias. Outcomes included both qualitative and quantitative pre-CI and post-CI measures of CP disability or QOL.
Results: Of 1615 screened articles, 9 studies utilizing quantitative and qualitative measures with 504 CP met inclusion criteria. Four of 6 studies assessing only post-CI CP QOL, demonstrated self-reported improvement, while one demonstrated worse CP QOL compared with the general population and one identified CP and CI recipient qualities that correlated with CP QOL scores. Two studies assessing pre-CI to post-CI CP QOL also reported improvements. One study assessing only pre-CI CP QOL suggested that CPs had worse QOL than normal hearing controls. Duration of CI recipient hearing loss did not impact CP QOL in any study.
Conclusions: Though homogenous data on the QOL of CPs of CI recipients and the relationship between CI recipient and CP factors is limited, studies suggest that CPs of CI recipients may have worse QOL than the general population but, cochlear implantation may improve CP QOL.
期刊介绍:
Otology & Neurotology publishes original articles relating to both clinical and basic science aspects of otology, neurotology, and cranial base surgery. As the foremost journal in its field, it has become the favored place for publishing the best of new science relating to the human ear and its diseases. The broadly international character of its contributing authors, editorial board, and readership provides the Journal its decidedly global perspective.