Liposomal Bupivacaine in Transversus Abdominis Plane Block for Postoperative Pain Control After Autologous Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

IF 1.7 3区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Microsurgery Pub Date : 2025-10-03 DOI:10.1002/micr.70126
Victor F. A. Almeida, Glaudir Donato, Andressa Alves de Carvalho, Wanessa Alves de Carvalho, Ammar Lakda, Yara Dias, Manoela Dantas, Pedro Danielian, Eliana F. R. Duraes
{"title":"Liposomal Bupivacaine in Transversus Abdominis Plane Block for Postoperative Pain Control After Autologous Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis","authors":"Victor F. A. Almeida,&nbsp;Glaudir Donato,&nbsp;Andressa Alves de Carvalho,&nbsp;Wanessa Alves de Carvalho,&nbsp;Ammar Lakda,&nbsp;Yara Dias,&nbsp;Manoela Dantas,&nbsp;Pedro Danielian,&nbsp;Eliana F. R. Duraes","doi":"10.1002/micr.70126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Autologous breast reconstruction using abdominally based flaps is common post-mastectomy, but donor-site pain often leads to prolonged opioid use. The transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block is a common regional anesthesia technique, with bupivacaine as the standard anesthetic. Liposomal bupivacaine (LB), a prolonged-release formulation, aims to extend pain relief and reduce opioid consumption, though its efficacy remains debated.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>This systematic review and meta-analysis compared LB versus plain bupivacaine (PB) in TAP blocks for autologous breast reconstruction, focusing on opioid consumption, pain scores, and hospital stay.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A systematic search identified randomized controlled trials and observational studies comparing LB (with or without PB) to PB in TAP blocks. Data were pooled using a random-effects model (<i>I</i><sup>2</sup> ≥ 25%) or fixed-effects model (<i>I</i><sup>2</sup> &lt; 25%).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Six studies (429 patients) met inclusion criteria. LB was associated with significant reduction in opioid consumption on postoperative days (POD) 1 (MD = −4.99 mg; 95% CI: [−8.42; −1.56], <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 0%) and POD 2 (MD = −3.35 mg; 95% CI: [−5.74; −0.96], <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 0%). Pain scores were significantly lower on POD 2 and POD 3. No difference in hospital stay was found (MD = −0.17; 95% CI: [−0.52; 0.18], <i>p</i> = 0.34, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 83.1%).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>LB reduced opioid consumption during the first 48 h postoperatively and modestly improved pain control on POD 2 and POD 3, but did not shorten hospital stay. Further large-scale RCTs are needed to validate its benefits.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":18600,"journal":{"name":"Microsurgery","volume":"45 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/micr.70126","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microsurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/micr.70126","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Autologous breast reconstruction using abdominally based flaps is common post-mastectomy, but donor-site pain often leads to prolonged opioid use. The transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block is a common regional anesthesia technique, with bupivacaine as the standard anesthetic. Liposomal bupivacaine (LB), a prolonged-release formulation, aims to extend pain relief and reduce opioid consumption, though its efficacy remains debated.

Objective

This systematic review and meta-analysis compared LB versus plain bupivacaine (PB) in TAP blocks for autologous breast reconstruction, focusing on opioid consumption, pain scores, and hospital stay.

Methods

A systematic search identified randomized controlled trials and observational studies comparing LB (with or without PB) to PB in TAP blocks. Data were pooled using a random-effects model (I2 ≥ 25%) or fixed-effects model (I2 < 25%).

Results

Six studies (429 patients) met inclusion criteria. LB was associated with significant reduction in opioid consumption on postoperative days (POD) 1 (MD = −4.99 mg; 95% CI: [−8.42; −1.56], p < 0.01, I2 = 0%) and POD 2 (MD = −3.35 mg; 95% CI: [−5.74; −0.96], p < 0.01, I2 = 0%). Pain scores were significantly lower on POD 2 and POD 3. No difference in hospital stay was found (MD = −0.17; 95% CI: [−0.52; 0.18], p = 0.34, I2 = 83.1%).

Conclusion

LB reduced opioid consumption during the first 48 h postoperatively and modestly improved pain control on POD 2 and POD 3, but did not shorten hospital stay. Further large-scale RCTs are needed to validate its benefits.

Abstract Image

布比卡因脂质体在经腹平面阻滞中用于自体乳房重建术后疼痛控制:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。
背景:乳房切除术后使用腹部皮瓣进行自体乳房重建是常见的,但供体部位疼痛往往导致阿片类药物使用时间延长。腹横面阻滞(TAP)是一种常用的区域麻醉技术,布比卡因为标准麻醉剂。布比卡因脂质体(LB)是一种缓释制剂,旨在延长疼痛缓解和减少阿片类药物的消耗,尽管其功效仍存在争议。目的:本系统综述和荟萃分析比较了LB与普通布比卡因(PB)在自体乳房重建TAP阻滞中的应用,重点关注阿片类药物的消耗、疼痛评分和住院时间。方法:系统检索了随机对照试验和观察性研究,比较了TAP块中LB(含或不含PB)和PB。采用随机效应模型(I2≥25%)或固定效应模型(I2)合并数据。结果:6项研究(429例患者)符合纳入标准。LB与术后天阿片类药物消耗(POD) 1 (MD = -4.99 mg; 95% CI: [-8.42; -1.56], p 2 = 0%)和POD 2 (MD = -3.35 mg; 95% CI: [-5.74; -0.96], p 2 = 0%)显著减少相关。POD 2和POD 3疼痛评分明显降低。住院时间无差异(MD = -0.17; 95% CI: [-0.52; 0.18], p = 0.34, I2 = 83.1%)。结论:LB减少了术后48小时内阿片类药物的消耗,并适度改善了POD 2和POD 3的疼痛控制,但没有缩短住院时间。需要进一步的大规模随机对照试验来验证其益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Microsurgery
Microsurgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
19.00%
发文量
128
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Microsurgery is an international and interdisciplinary publication of original contributions concerning surgery under microscopic magnification. Microsurgery publishes clinical studies, research papers, invited articles, relevant reviews, and other scholarly works from all related fields including orthopaedic surgery, otolaryngology, pediatric surgery, plastic surgery, urology, and vascular surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信