Comparison of the efficacy of radial and focused extracorporeal shock-wave therapy (ESWT) in myofascial pain syndrome: a randomized, sham-controlled study.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Hüma Bölük Şenlikci, Özlem Yücealp, Pınar Borman, Zeynep Ince Keskin, Sevgi Gümüş Atalay, Evren Yaşar
{"title":"Comparison of the efficacy of radial and focused extracorporeal shock-wave therapy (ESWT) in myofascial pain syndrome: a randomized, sham-controlled study.","authors":"Hüma Bölük Şenlikci, Özlem Yücealp, Pınar Borman, Zeynep Ince Keskin, Sevgi Gümüş Atalay, Evren Yaşar","doi":"10.1007/s10103-025-04676-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Myofascial pain syndrome (MPS) is one of the most common pain syndromes characterized by painful trigger points. Active trigger points may cause spontaneous pain, reduce quality of life, and result in workforce loss. Extracorporeal shock-wave therapy (ESWT), using radial or focused acoustic waves created outside the body, is a treatment method used for musculoskeletal problems. In Focused ESWT (F-ESWT), the depth of the body part to be targeted can be adjusted. Penetration into the tissue is better than radial waves. Radial ESWT (R-ESWT) has a more superficial effect, and its spread in liquids with a density similar to tissues is half that of focused ESWT. Previous studies have shown that radial and focused ESWT waves applied to trigger points in the upper trapezius fibres reduce reflected and local pain in myofascial pain syndrome. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of radial and focused ESWT types on trigger points in upper trapezius fibres in patients with myofascial pain syndrome. This prospective, randomized, sham-controlled study included 57 patients, randomly assigned to one of 3 groups. The patients underwent R-ESWT, F-ESWT and sham protocols for 4 sessions. Evaluations were made with a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) to assess pain, the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), and the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) before treatment, post-treatment, then at 1, 3 and 6 months after completion of the treatment. Symptom duration was the only parameter that was significantly different between the groups before the treatment (p = 0.025). VAS scores improved after treatment compared to baseline for all groups (p < 0.05), with improvements continuing in the ESWT groups. The BDI and HAQ scores did not differ between the groups, and the F-ESWT group showed a significant improvement in BDI and HAQ (p < 0.01, p = 0.018, respectively). The VAS scores of the ESWT groups were similar and significantly higher than those of the sham group, but mid-long term changes did not differ across the groups (p = 0.065). In patients diagnosed with myofascial pain syndrome who underwent R-ESWT, F-ESWT and sham therapy on active trigger points in the upper trapezius fibres, an improvement in pain was observed in the R and F-ESWT groups even in the long term. While the improvement in pain scores was the same for the radial and focused types at all time points, the improvement in both was significantly higher compared to the sham application.</p>","PeriodicalId":17978,"journal":{"name":"Lasers in Medical Science","volume":"40 1","pages":"404"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lasers in Medical Science","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-025-04676-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Myofascial pain syndrome (MPS) is one of the most common pain syndromes characterized by painful trigger points. Active trigger points may cause spontaneous pain, reduce quality of life, and result in workforce loss. Extracorporeal shock-wave therapy (ESWT), using radial or focused acoustic waves created outside the body, is a treatment method used for musculoskeletal problems. In Focused ESWT (F-ESWT), the depth of the body part to be targeted can be adjusted. Penetration into the tissue is better than radial waves. Radial ESWT (R-ESWT) has a more superficial effect, and its spread in liquids with a density similar to tissues is half that of focused ESWT. Previous studies have shown that radial and focused ESWT waves applied to trigger points in the upper trapezius fibres reduce reflected and local pain in myofascial pain syndrome. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of radial and focused ESWT types on trigger points in upper trapezius fibres in patients with myofascial pain syndrome. This prospective, randomized, sham-controlled study included 57 patients, randomly assigned to one of 3 groups. The patients underwent R-ESWT, F-ESWT and sham protocols for 4 sessions. Evaluations were made with a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) to assess pain, the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), and the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) before treatment, post-treatment, then at 1, 3 and 6 months after completion of the treatment. Symptom duration was the only parameter that was significantly different between the groups before the treatment (p = 0.025). VAS scores improved after treatment compared to baseline for all groups (p < 0.05), with improvements continuing in the ESWT groups. The BDI and HAQ scores did not differ between the groups, and the F-ESWT group showed a significant improvement in BDI and HAQ (p < 0.01, p = 0.018, respectively). The VAS scores of the ESWT groups were similar and significantly higher than those of the sham group, but mid-long term changes did not differ across the groups (p = 0.065). In patients diagnosed with myofascial pain syndrome who underwent R-ESWT, F-ESWT and sham therapy on active trigger points in the upper trapezius fibres, an improvement in pain was observed in the R and F-ESWT groups even in the long term. While the improvement in pain scores was the same for the radial and focused types at all time points, the improvement in both was significantly higher compared to the sham application.

桡骨和聚焦体外冲击波治疗肌筋膜疼痛综合征的疗效比较:一项随机、假对照研究。
肌筋膜疼痛综合征(MPS)是一种以疼痛触发点为特征的最常见的疼痛综合征。活跃的触发点可能引起自发性疼痛,降低生活质量,并导致劳动力流失。体外冲击波疗法(ESWT),利用体外产生的径向或聚焦声波,是一种用于肌肉骨骼问题的治疗方法。在聚焦ESWT (F-ESWT)中,可以调整被瞄准身体部位的深度。穿透组织优于径向波。径向ESWT (R-ESWT)的作用更表面,其在密度与组织相似的液体中的传播是聚焦ESWT的一半。先前的研究表明,应用于斜方肌上部纤维触发点的径向和聚焦ESWT波可以减轻肌筋膜疼痛综合征的反射和局部疼痛。本研究的目的是比较放射型和聚焦型ESWT对肌筋膜疼痛综合征患者上斜方肌纤维触发点的有效性。这项前瞻性、随机、假对照研究包括57名患者,随机分为3组。患者接受R-ESWT、F-ESWT和假手术治疗4次。分别在治疗前、治疗后、治疗结束后1个月、3个月和6个月采用视觉模拟量表(VAS)、健康评估问卷(HAQ)和贝克抑郁量表(BDI)评估疼痛。症状持续时间是治疗前两组间唯一有显著差异的参数(p = 0.025)。治疗后各组VAS评分较基线均有改善(p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Lasers in Medical Science
Lasers in Medical Science 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
4.80%
发文量
192
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Lasers in Medical Science (LIMS) has established itself as the leading international journal in the rapidly expanding field of medical and dental applications of lasers and light. It provides a forum for the publication of papers on the technical, experimental, and clinical aspects of the use of medical lasers, including lasers in surgery, endoscopy, angioplasty, hyperthermia of tumors, and photodynamic therapy. In addition to medical laser applications, LIMS presents high-quality manuscripts on a wide range of dental topics, including aesthetic dentistry, endodontics, orthodontics, and prosthodontics. The journal publishes articles on the medical and dental applications of novel laser technologies, light delivery systems, sensors to monitor laser effects, basic laser-tissue interactions, and the modeling of laser-tissue interactions. Beyond laser applications, LIMS features articles relating to the use of non-laser light-tissue interactions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信