Desflurane Safety Revisited: A Pharmacovigilance Study Detecting Potential Safety Signals from FAERS Data.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Journal of Pain Research Pub Date : 2025-09-26 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/JPR.S544011
Wei Wei, Liang Chen, Xiaomei Ying
{"title":"Desflurane Safety Revisited: A Pharmacovigilance Study Detecting Potential Safety Signals from FAERS Data.","authors":"Wei Wei, Liang Chen, Xiaomei Ying","doi":"10.2147/JPR.S544011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Desflurane is a widely used volatile anesthetic with multiple clinical advantages, but comprehensive pharmacovigilance analyses are needed to optimize its safety profile. This study aimed to analyze and classify adverse events(AEs) associated with desflurane in the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System(FAERS) database and evaluate potential safety signals.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>We analyzed FAERS reports from 2004Q1 to 2025Q1 where desflurane was the primary suspect(PS) drug. Cases were classified using Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA27.1) terminology and processed following FDA-recommended deduplication strategy. Four disproportionality analyses were conducted: Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR), Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR), Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network (BCPNN), and Multi-item Gamma Poisson Shrinker (MGPS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 1,191 cases, bradycardia was most frequent (n = 39; ROR = 38.72, 95% CI 28.14-53.28) with 79.4% classified as serious. Notable findings included anaphylactic shock (n = 23; 69.6% serious), bronchospasm (n = 22), and malignant hyperthermia(MH) (n = 20; 25% mortality). Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) (n = 2) and disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) (n = 2) were documented - a previously unreported association with desflurane exposure.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our analysis reveals clinically significant safety signals associated with desflurane, including cardiovascular, anaphylactic, and respiratory complications that may require enhanced perioperative monitoring. The study underscores the critical importance of sustained post-marketing surveillance for detecting rare but serious safety signals, not typically evident in pre-approval clinical trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":16661,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pain Research","volume":"18 ","pages":"5069-5080"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12484100/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pain Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S544011","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Desflurane is a widely used volatile anesthetic with multiple clinical advantages, but comprehensive pharmacovigilance analyses are needed to optimize its safety profile. This study aimed to analyze and classify adverse events(AEs) associated with desflurane in the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System(FAERS) database and evaluate potential safety signals.

Patients and methods: We analyzed FAERS reports from 2004Q1 to 2025Q1 where desflurane was the primary suspect(PS) drug. Cases were classified using Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA27.1) terminology and processed following FDA-recommended deduplication strategy. Four disproportionality analyses were conducted: Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR), Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR), Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network (BCPNN), and Multi-item Gamma Poisson Shrinker (MGPS).

Results: Among 1,191 cases, bradycardia was most frequent (n = 39; ROR = 38.72, 95% CI 28.14-53.28) with 79.4% classified as serious. Notable findings included anaphylactic shock (n = 23; 69.6% serious), bronchospasm (n = 22), and malignant hyperthermia(MH) (n = 20; 25% mortality). Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) (n = 2) and disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) (n = 2) were documented - a previously unreported association with desflurane exposure.

Conclusion: Our analysis reveals clinically significant safety signals associated with desflurane, including cardiovascular, anaphylactic, and respiratory complications that may require enhanced perioperative monitoring. The study underscores the critical importance of sustained post-marketing surveillance for detecting rare but serious safety signals, not typically evident in pre-approval clinical trials.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

重新审视地氟醚安全性:一项从FAERS数据中检测潜在安全信号的药物警戒研究。
目的:地氟醚是一种广泛使用的挥发性麻醉剂,具有多种临床优势,但需要全面的药物警戒分析来优化其安全性。本研究旨在分析和分类美国食品和药物管理局不良事件报告系统(FAERS)数据库中与地氟醚相关的不良事件(ae),并评估潜在的安全信号。患者和方法:我们分析了2004年第一季度至2025年第一季度的FAERS报告,其中地氟醚是主要怀疑(PS)药物。病例使用医学词典(MedDRA27.1)术语进行分类,并按照fda推荐的重复数据删除策略进行处理。进行了四项歧化分析:报告优势比(ROR)、比例报告比(PRR)、贝叶斯置信传播神经网络(BCPNN)和多项目伽玛泊松收缩器(MGPS)。结果:1191例患者中,以心动过缓最为常见(n = 39; ROR = 38.72, 95% CI 28.14 ~ 53.28),其中重症占79.4%。值得注意的发现包括过敏性休克(n = 23, 69.6%严重)、支气管痉挛(n = 22)和恶性高热(n = 20,死亡率25%)。记录了急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS) (n = 2)和弥散性血管内凝血(DIC) (n = 2)——这是以前未报道的与地氟醚暴露的关联。结论:我们的分析揭示了临床上与地氟醚相关的重要安全信号,包括心血管、过敏和呼吸系统并发症,可能需要加强围手术期监测。该研究强调了持续的上市后监测对于发现罕见但严重的安全信号的重要性,这些信号在批准前的临床试验中通常不明显。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Pain Research
Journal of Pain Research CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
3.70%
发文量
411
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Pain Research is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal that welcomes laboratory and clinical findings in the fields of pain research and the prevention and management of pain. Original research, reviews, symposium reports, hypothesis formation and commentaries are all considered for publication. Additionally, the journal now welcomes the submission of pain-policy-related editorials and commentaries, particularly in regard to ethical, regulatory, forensic, and other legal issues in pain medicine, and to the education of pain practitioners and researchers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信