Mechanisms of inequitable access to parkinson's disease care: a critical interpretive synthesis.

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Sharon Koehn, Neil Drummond, Lisa Jasper, Anh Nq Pham, Karen Leung, Denise Cloutier, Marguerite Wieler, C Allyson Jones
{"title":"Mechanisms of inequitable access to parkinson's disease care: a critical interpretive synthesis.","authors":"Sharon Koehn, Neil Drummond, Lisa Jasper, Anh Nq Pham, Karen Leung, Denise Cloutier, Marguerite Wieler, C Allyson Jones","doi":"10.1186/s12939-025-02538-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Parkinson's disease (PD) is a leading cause of neurological disability among older adults, with an age-standardized global prevalence in 2021 of 139/100,000 and projected to increase by 112% by 2050. People living with PD experience seven times worse health status than the general population. Access to diagnosis, care, and support is particularly challenged by intersecting social and healthcare system complexities. This Critical Interpretive Synthesis aimed to identify mechanisms through which barriers interact to create inequitable access to PD care among underserved populations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched five bibliographic databases (MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsychINFO, and Scopus) for English-language sources (2005 to 2024). Inclusion criteria encompassed peer-reviewed articles, books, dissertations, and organizational reports mentioning underserved older adults with PD and their care partners. Analysis followed Critical Interpretive Synthesis methodology, combining systematic review strategies with meta-ethnography and grounded theory techniques. Two investigators independently screened citations, with analysis guided by Candidacy 2.0 and Intersectionality frameworks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1,281 identified studies, 96 met inclusion criteria. United States studies dominated (56%), with quantitative analyses of electronic medical records comprising 66% of evidence. Analysis revealed three interrelated mechanisms shaping access inequities: (1) complex interplay between regional factors and healthcare delivery systems creating variable landscapes of access, (2) provider biases and judgments serving as critical gatekeeping points, and (3) intersectional effects of multiple marginalized identities compounding disadvantage. These mechanisms interact systematically, creating self-reinforcing cycles where social marginalization increases both disease progression and barriers to appropriate care.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Improving PD care access requires coordinated interventions addressing multiple intersecting barriers simultaneously. For policy and management, this includes targeted funding for infrastructure, systematic provider education addressing knowledge gaps and biases, and integration of community-based solutions with formal healthcare. Future research should examine how informal care networks can enhance access in diverse healthcare contexts.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>The scoping review on which this Critical Interpretive synthesis builds is registered with Open Science Framework: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/2T7KG .</p>","PeriodicalId":13745,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Equity in Health","volume":"24 1","pages":"250"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12492797/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Equity in Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-025-02538-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Parkinson's disease (PD) is a leading cause of neurological disability among older adults, with an age-standardized global prevalence in 2021 of 139/100,000 and projected to increase by 112% by 2050. People living with PD experience seven times worse health status than the general population. Access to diagnosis, care, and support is particularly challenged by intersecting social and healthcare system complexities. This Critical Interpretive Synthesis aimed to identify mechanisms through which barriers interact to create inequitable access to PD care among underserved populations.

Methods: We searched five bibliographic databases (MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsychINFO, and Scopus) for English-language sources (2005 to 2024). Inclusion criteria encompassed peer-reviewed articles, books, dissertations, and organizational reports mentioning underserved older adults with PD and their care partners. Analysis followed Critical Interpretive Synthesis methodology, combining systematic review strategies with meta-ethnography and grounded theory techniques. Two investigators independently screened citations, with analysis guided by Candidacy 2.0 and Intersectionality frameworks.

Results: Of 1,281 identified studies, 96 met inclusion criteria. United States studies dominated (56%), with quantitative analyses of electronic medical records comprising 66% of evidence. Analysis revealed three interrelated mechanisms shaping access inequities: (1) complex interplay between regional factors and healthcare delivery systems creating variable landscapes of access, (2) provider biases and judgments serving as critical gatekeeping points, and (3) intersectional effects of multiple marginalized identities compounding disadvantage. These mechanisms interact systematically, creating self-reinforcing cycles where social marginalization increases both disease progression and barriers to appropriate care.

Conclusions: Improving PD care access requires coordinated interventions addressing multiple intersecting barriers simultaneously. For policy and management, this includes targeted funding for infrastructure, systematic provider education addressing knowledge gaps and biases, and integration of community-based solutions with formal healthcare. Future research should examine how informal care networks can enhance access in diverse healthcare contexts.

Registration: The scoping review on which this Critical Interpretive synthesis builds is registered with Open Science Framework: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/2T7KG .

Abstract Image

不公平获得帕金森病治疗的机制:一个关键的解释性综合。
背景:帕金森病(PD)是老年人神经功能障碍的主要原因,2021年全球年龄标准化患病率为139/10万,预计到2050年将增加112%。PD患者的健康状况比一般人群差7倍。由于社会和卫生保健系统的复杂性交织在一起,获得诊断、护理和支持尤其受到挑战。这一关键的解释性综合旨在确定机制,通过这些障碍相互作用,在服务不足的人群中创造不公平的PD护理机会。方法:检索5个文献数据库(MEDLINE、Embase、CINAHL、PsychINFO和Scopus),检索2005 - 2024年的英文文献。纳入标准包括同行评议的文章、书籍、论文和组织报告,其中提到了缺乏服务的老年PD患者及其护理伙伴。分析遵循批判性解释综合方法,将系统综述策略与元民族志和扎根理论技术相结合。两位研究者独立筛选引文,并以候选资格2.0和交叉性框架为指导进行分析。结果:在1281项研究中,96项符合纳入标准。美国的研究占主导地位(56%),电子医疗记录的定量分析占66%的证据。分析揭示了形成可及性不平等的三个相互关联的机制:(1)区域因素与医疗保健服务系统之间复杂的相互作用,导致可及性景观的变化;(2)提供者的偏见和判断是关键的把关点;(3)多重边缘化身份复合劣势的交叉效应。这些机制有系统地相互作用,形成自我强化的循环,在这种循环中,社会边缘化加剧了疾病进展和获得适当护理的障碍。结论:改善PD护理可及性需要协调干预措施,同时解决多个交叉障碍。在政策和管理方面,这包括为基础设施提供有针对性的资金,对提供者进行系统的教育,解决知识差距和偏见,以及将社区解决方案与正规医疗保健相结合。未来的研究应该检查非正式护理网络如何在不同的医疗环境中提高可及性。注册:此批判性解释性综合构建的范围审查已在开放科学框架上注册:https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/2T7KG。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
4.20%
发文量
162
审稿时长
28 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal for Equity in Health is an Open Access, peer-reviewed, online journal presenting evidence relevant to the search for, and attainment of, equity in health across and within countries. International Journal for Equity in Health aims to improve the understanding of issues that influence the health of populations. This includes the discussion of political, policy-related, economic, social and health services-related influences, particularly with regard to systematic differences in distributions of one or more aspects of health in population groups defined demographically, geographically, or socially.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信