Metric analysis of the postcranial skeleton: a comprehensive approach for biological sex estimation in an Italian population.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, LEGAL
Paolo Morandini, Lucie Biehler-Gomez, Kyra Stull, Cristina Cattaneo
{"title":"Metric analysis of the postcranial skeleton: a comprehensive approach for biological sex estimation in an Italian population.","authors":"Paolo Morandini, Lucie Biehler-Gomez, Kyra Stull, Cristina Cattaneo","doi":"10.1007/s00414-025-03599-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This paper presents a metric methodology for estimating biological sex specifically tailored to the Italian population. The method considers 121 standard metric measurements derived from 46 bones across various post-cranial regions.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The sample consists of 400 individuals (M = 200; F = 200) from the 20th century CAL Milano Cemetery Skeletal Collection aged 20 to 104 years old. The sample was divided into a training subset (75%; n = 300) and a testing subset (25%, n = 100). Intra- and inter-observer analyses, as well as univariate sectioning points, and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Intra- and inter-observer analysis showed excellent reproducibility of the measurements, with some exceptions generally related to the measurement of long bone diameters. Univariate sectioning points resulted in 18 measurements with accuracies exceeding 90%, and another 48 measurements achieving over 80% accuracy. In total, 43 multivariable logistic regression models were developed for 32 bones, and these models further increased the accuracy.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The validation of these models demonstrated that the proposed methodology allows for sex estimation with accuracies of over or near 90% and minimal class discrimination bias across all post-cranial skeletal regions. The highest accuracies - with both sectioning points and multivariable models - were the radius (96.8%), scapula (95.3%), and tibia (95.2%). This study introduces a comprehensive metric standard for the Italian population and highlights the accuracy of the metric approach for estimating biological sex.</p>","PeriodicalId":14071,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Legal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Legal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-025-03599-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, LEGAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This paper presents a metric methodology for estimating biological sex specifically tailored to the Italian population. The method considers 121 standard metric measurements derived from 46 bones across various post-cranial regions.

Materials and methods: The sample consists of 400 individuals (M = 200; F = 200) from the 20th century CAL Milano Cemetery Skeletal Collection aged 20 to 104 years old. The sample was divided into a training subset (75%; n = 300) and a testing subset (25%, n = 100). Intra- and inter-observer analyses, as well as univariate sectioning points, and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed.

Results: Intra- and inter-observer analysis showed excellent reproducibility of the measurements, with some exceptions generally related to the measurement of long bone diameters. Univariate sectioning points resulted in 18 measurements with accuracies exceeding 90%, and another 48 measurements achieving over 80% accuracy. In total, 43 multivariable logistic regression models were developed for 32 bones, and these models further increased the accuracy.

Discussion: The validation of these models demonstrated that the proposed methodology allows for sex estimation with accuracies of over or near 90% and minimal class discrimination bias across all post-cranial skeletal regions. The highest accuracies - with both sectioning points and multivariable models - were the radius (96.8%), scapula (95.3%), and tibia (95.2%). This study introduces a comprehensive metric standard for the Italian population and highlights the accuracy of the metric approach for estimating biological sex.

颅后骨骼的计量分析:在意大利人口的生物性别估计的综合方法。
目的:本文提出了一种专门为意大利人口量身定制的估计生物性别的度量方法。该方法考虑了来自颅后不同区域的46块骨头的121个标准度量。材料和方法:样本由400个个体组成(M = 200; F = 200),来自20世纪CAL Milano公墓骨骼收藏,年龄在20至104岁之间。将样本分为训练子集(75%,n = 300)和测试子集(25%,n = 100)。进行了观察者内部和观察者之间的分析,以及单变量切片点和多变量逻辑回归分析。结果:观察者内部和观察者之间的分析显示测量结果具有良好的再现性,除了一些与长骨直径测量有关的例外。单变量切片点导致18个测量精度超过90%,另外48个测量精度超过80%。共建立了32块骨的43个多变量logistic回归模型,进一步提高了模型的准确性。讨论:这些模型的验证表明,所提出的方法允许性别估计的准确性超过或接近90%,并且在所有颅后骨骼区域中最小的阶级歧视偏差。无论是切点还是多变量模型,准确率最高的是半径(96.8%)、肩胛骨(95.3%)和胫骨(95.2%)。本研究介绍了意大利人口的综合度量标准,并强调了估计生物性别的度量方法的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
9.50%
发文量
165
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Legal Medicine aims to improve the scientific resources used in the elucidation of crime and related forensic applications at a high level of evidential proof. The journal offers review articles tracing development in specific areas, with up-to-date analysis; original articles discussing significant recent research results; case reports describing interesting and exceptional examples; population data; letters to the editors; and technical notes, which appear in a section originally created for rapid publication of data in the dynamic field of DNA analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信