Noor Al Khathlan, Lama Omar Badghish, Hanin Hamed Alrehaili, Khalid Hamoud Olayan Al Luhaybi, Moayed Abdullah Alnakhli, Abdulhadi Jameel Alotaibi
{"title":"A Bibliometric Analysis of Pulmonary Function Testing in Differentiating Asthma From COPD: Trends, Impact, and Emerging Research Areas.","authors":"Noor Al Khathlan, Lama Omar Badghish, Hanin Hamed Alrehaili, Khalid Hamoud Olayan Al Luhaybi, Moayed Abdullah Alnakhli, Abdulhadi Jameel Alotaibi","doi":"10.2147/JMDH.S539721","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Distinguishing between asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) remains a clinical challenge due to overlapping symptoms and pulmonary function test (PFT) results. Accurate differentiation is crucial for effective treatment and optimal patient care. This study employs bibliometric analysis to assess research trends, impact, and emerging areas in the use of PFTs for differentiating asthma from COPD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search was conducted in the Web of Science Core Collection, including both asthma- and COPD-related terms to reflect clinical overlap, identifying publications from 1989 to November 2024. Data were analyzed using VOSviewer, CiteSpace, Excel, and Biblioshiny to evaluate publication trends, influential authors, key research themes, and international collaboration networks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis included 241 original research and review articles. Research activity increased significantly after 2006, peaking in 2022. The United States and England were the leading contributors, with major academic institutions and AstraZeneca playing key roles. Keywords such as \"spirometry\", \"diagnosis\", and \"bronchodilator response\" emerged as major research trends. Co-citation analysis identified the European Respiratory Journal as the most influential source.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Bibliometric analysis highlights a growing body of research emphasizing the role of PFTs in differentiating asthma from COPD. While spirometry remains the gold standard, recent trends show increasing interest in novel diagnostic approaches. Further studies are needed to refine diagnostic criteria and improve clinical decision-making. Our findings underscore the novelty of this bibliometric analysis in mapping global research dynamics and highlight potential clinical implications for refining diagnostic strategies in asthma and COPD.</p>","PeriodicalId":16357,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare","volume":"18 ","pages":"6187-6203"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12484102/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S539721","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Distinguishing between asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) remains a clinical challenge due to overlapping symptoms and pulmonary function test (PFT) results. Accurate differentiation is crucial for effective treatment and optimal patient care. This study employs bibliometric analysis to assess research trends, impact, and emerging areas in the use of PFTs for differentiating asthma from COPD.
Methods: A systematic search was conducted in the Web of Science Core Collection, including both asthma- and COPD-related terms to reflect clinical overlap, identifying publications from 1989 to November 2024. Data were analyzed using VOSviewer, CiteSpace, Excel, and Biblioshiny to evaluate publication trends, influential authors, key research themes, and international collaboration networks.
Results: The analysis included 241 original research and review articles. Research activity increased significantly after 2006, peaking in 2022. The United States and England were the leading contributors, with major academic institutions and AstraZeneca playing key roles. Keywords such as "spirometry", "diagnosis", and "bronchodilator response" emerged as major research trends. Co-citation analysis identified the European Respiratory Journal as the most influential source.
Conclusion: Bibliometric analysis highlights a growing body of research emphasizing the role of PFTs in differentiating asthma from COPD. While spirometry remains the gold standard, recent trends show increasing interest in novel diagnostic approaches. Further studies are needed to refine diagnostic criteria and improve clinical decision-making. Our findings underscore the novelty of this bibliometric analysis in mapping global research dynamics and highlight potential clinical implications for refining diagnostic strategies in asthma and COPD.
背景:由于症状和肺功能检查(PFT)结果重叠,区分哮喘和慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)仍然是一个临床挑战。准确的鉴别对于有效的治疗和最佳的病人护理至关重要。本研究采用文献计量学分析来评估PFTs用于区分哮喘和COPD的研究趋势、影响和新兴领域。方法:系统检索Web of Science核心馆藏,包括哮喘和copd相关术语,以反映临床重叠,识别1989年至2024年11月的出版物。使用VOSviewer、CiteSpace、Excel和Biblioshiny等软件对数据进行分析,评估出版趋势、影响力作者、重点研究主题和国际合作网络。结果:纳入241篇原创研究和综述。研究活动在2006年之后显著增加,并在2022年达到顶峰。美国和英国是主要贡献者,主要学术机构和阿斯利康发挥了关键作用。“肺活量测定”、“诊断”、“支气管扩张剂反应”等关键词成为主要的研究趋势。共引分析发现欧洲呼吸杂志是最有影响力的来源。结论:文献计量学分析表明,越来越多的研究强调PFTs在区分哮喘和COPD中的作用。虽然肺活量测定法仍然是金标准,但最近的趋势表明人们对新的诊断方法越来越感兴趣。需要进一步的研究来完善诊断标准和改善临床决策。我们的研究结果强调了这种文献计量分析在绘制全球研究动态方面的新颖性,并强调了改进哮喘和COPD诊断策略的潜在临床意义。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare (JMDH) aims to represent and publish research in healthcare areas delivered by practitioners of different disciplines. This includes studies and reviews conducted by multidisciplinary teams as well as research which evaluates or reports the results or conduct of such teams or healthcare processes in general. The journal covers a very wide range of areas and we welcome submissions from practitioners at all levels and from all over the world. Good healthcare is not bounded by person, place or time and the journal aims to reflect this. The JMDH is published as an open-access journal to allow this wide range of practical, patient relevant research to be immediately available to practitioners who can access and use it immediately upon publication.