Missed colorectal cancer diagnosis by screening colonoscopy based on the PLCO cancer screening trial.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Ying Li, Huan Xiong, Tongzhou Liang, Yuying Liu, Longjun He, Wencheng Tan, Yuhong Wang, Xiaofang Qiu, Bilv Zhong, Chuanbo Xie, Jianjun Li
{"title":"Missed colorectal cancer diagnosis by screening colonoscopy based on the PLCO cancer screening trial.","authors":"Ying Li, Huan Xiong, Tongzhou Liang, Yuying Liu, Longjun He, Wencheng Tan, Yuhong Wang, Xiaofang Qiu, Bilv Zhong, Chuanbo Xie, Jianjun Li","doi":"10.1007/s00384-025-04952-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the proportion of colorectal cancer (CRC) missed by colonoscopy and the characteristics of the patients with missed diagnosis using data from the prostate, lung, colorectal, and ovarian (PLCO) cancer screening trial, and to analyze and compare patient survival between detection and missed diagnosis groups for an evidence-based basis for improving the effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Patients with CRC identified by baseline or follow-up colonoscopy and those identified by annual study update questionnaires or National Death Index search, without any positive findings by colonoscopy in the screening arm of the PLCO study, were included in this study. We calculated the rate of missed CRC diagnosis by colonoscopy using the definition of missed cases as the numerator and the sum of patients with CRC as the denominator.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three hundred sixty patients with CRC were included in the final analysis (detection group, n = 298; missed diagnosis group, n = 62). The overall rate of missed CRC diagnosis by colonoscopy was 17.22%. Patients with a history of colorectal polyps had a higher rate of missed diagnoses (33.3%). The missed diagnosis rate was higher in patients with proximal CRC (31.3%). CRC occurring in the transverse colon (29.6%), hepatic flexure of the colon (40.0%), ascending colon (27.0%), and cecum (36.6%) were more likely to be missed by colonoscopy. The later the stage, the higher the missed CRC diagnosis rate (10.5, 20.0, 30.8, and 30.8% for stages I-IV, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Colonoscopy missed a relatively high proportion of CRC, mainly in the proximal colon (especially in the hepatic flexure and cecum of the colon). Recent developments in non-invasive screening technologies, such as stool DNA testing and liquid biopsy, may help address the limitations of colonoscopy. Combining these approaches with traditional endoscopy could enhance overall detection accuracy and reduce the rate of missed colorectal cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":13789,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Colorectal Disease","volume":"40 1","pages":"206"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12491349/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Colorectal Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-025-04952-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the proportion of colorectal cancer (CRC) missed by colonoscopy and the characteristics of the patients with missed diagnosis using data from the prostate, lung, colorectal, and ovarian (PLCO) cancer screening trial, and to analyze and compare patient survival between detection and missed diagnosis groups for an evidence-based basis for improving the effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening.

Patients and methods: Patients with CRC identified by baseline or follow-up colonoscopy and those identified by annual study update questionnaires or National Death Index search, without any positive findings by colonoscopy in the screening arm of the PLCO study, were included in this study. We calculated the rate of missed CRC diagnosis by colonoscopy using the definition of missed cases as the numerator and the sum of patients with CRC as the denominator.

Results: Three hundred sixty patients with CRC were included in the final analysis (detection group, n = 298; missed diagnosis group, n = 62). The overall rate of missed CRC diagnosis by colonoscopy was 17.22%. Patients with a history of colorectal polyps had a higher rate of missed diagnoses (33.3%). The missed diagnosis rate was higher in patients with proximal CRC (31.3%). CRC occurring in the transverse colon (29.6%), hepatic flexure of the colon (40.0%), ascending colon (27.0%), and cecum (36.6%) were more likely to be missed by colonoscopy. The later the stage, the higher the missed CRC diagnosis rate (10.5, 20.0, 30.8, and 30.8% for stages I-IV, respectively).

Conclusion: Colonoscopy missed a relatively high proportion of CRC, mainly in the proximal colon (especially in the hepatic flexure and cecum of the colon). Recent developments in non-invasive screening technologies, such as stool DNA testing and liquid biopsy, may help address the limitations of colonoscopy. Combining these approaches with traditional endoscopy could enhance overall detection accuracy and reduce the rate of missed colorectal cancer.

基于PLCO癌症筛查试验的结肠镜筛查漏诊结直肠癌。
目的:本研究旨在利用前列腺、肺、结、卵巢(PLCO)肿瘤筛查试验数据,评价结直肠癌(CRC)结肠镜漏诊比例及漏诊患者特点,分析比较漏诊组和漏诊组患者生存率,为提高结直肠癌筛查的有效性提供循证依据。患者和方法:通过基线或随访结肠镜检查确定的结直肠癌患者,以及通过年度研究更新问卷或国家死亡指数搜索确定的结直肠癌患者,在PLCO研究的筛查组中结肠镜检查未发现任何阳性结果,纳入本研究。我们以漏诊例数定义为分子,以结直肠癌患者总数为分母,计算结直肠癌结肠镜漏诊率。结果:360例结直肠癌患者纳入最终分析,其中检出组298例,漏诊组62例。结肠镜检查漏诊率为17.22%。有结直肠息肉病史的患者漏诊率较高(33.3%)。近端结直肠癌患者的漏诊率较高(31.3%)。发生在横结肠(29.6%)、结肠肝曲(40.0%)、升结肠(27.0%)和盲肠(36.6%)的结直肠癌更容易被结肠镜检查遗漏。病程越晚,CRC漏诊率越高(I-IV期分别为10.5%、20.0%、30.8%和30.8%)。结论:结肠镜检查对结直肠癌的漏诊率较高,主要发生在近端结肠(尤其是结肠的肝曲和盲肠)。非侵入性筛查技术的最新发展,如粪便DNA检测和液体活检,可能有助于解决结肠镜检查的局限性。将这些方法与传统的内镜检查相结合,可以提高整体的检测准确率,降低结直肠癌的漏诊率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
3.60%
发文量
206
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Colorectal Disease, Clinical and Molecular Gastroenterology and Surgery aims to publish novel and state-of-the-art papers which deal with the physiology and pathophysiology of diseases involving the entire gastrointestinal tract. In addition to original research articles, the following categories will be included: reviews (usually commissioned but may also be submitted), case reports, letters to the editor, and protocols on clinical studies. The journal offers its readers an interdisciplinary forum for clinical science and molecular research related to gastrointestinal disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信