Effects of tDCS combined with TENS in relieving pain and improving gait patterns during stepping over obstacles among older adults with knee osteoarthritis.

IF 2.6 Q2 SPORT SCIENCES
Frontiers in Sports and Active Living Pub Date : 2025-09-17 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fspor.2025.1631357
Xinmeng Zhang, Dongmei Wang, Qingqing Song, Xin Luo, Yubin Ge, Peixin Shen, Qipeng Song
{"title":"Effects of tDCS combined with TENS in relieving pain and improving gait patterns during stepping over obstacles among older adults with knee osteoarthritis.","authors":"Xinmeng Zhang, Dongmei Wang, Qingqing Song, Xin Luo, Yubin Ge, Peixin Shen, Qipeng Song","doi":"10.3389/fspor.2025.1631357","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Older adults with knee osteoarthritis (KOA) exhibit an elevated risk of falls during obstacle negotiation, primarily due to pain-induced gait deviations. While transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) offers modest pain relief and limited gait modulation, combining it with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) may enhance the effects. This study evaluated the comparative efficacy of tDCS + TENS vs. TENS alone in mitigating pain and optimizing gait patterns during obstacle crossing in older adults with KOA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-three participants with KOA (mean age: 67.6 ± 5.0 years; BMI: 25.9 ± 2.4 kg/m<sup>2</sup>) were randomized to either tDCS + TENS (<i>n</i> = 12; 7F/5M) or TENS-only (<i>n</i> = 11; 7F/4M) groups. Both interventions involved 20-minute sessions, administered thrice weekly for six weeks. Outcome measures included pain intensity (visual analog scale, VAS) and gait variables (foot clearance height, crossing velocity) assessed pre- (week 0) and post-intervention (week 7). Data were analyzed using mixed-design two-way ANOVAs with Bonferroni corrections.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Statistically significant group-by-time interactions were observed for pain (<i>p</i> = 0.002, <i>η</i> <sup>2</sup> <sub>p</sub> = 0.378), foot clearance (<i>p</i> = 0.038, <i>η</i> <sup>2</sup> <sub>p</sub> = 0.190), and crossing velocity (<i>p</i> < 0.001, <i>η</i> <sup>2</sup> <sub>p</sub> = 0.588). <i>post hoc</i> analyses revealed that the tDCS + TENS group (week0 = 4.72 ± 1.01, week7 = 1.98 ± 0.88, <i>p</i> < 0.001) experienced significantly greater reductions in pain scores compared to the TENS-only group (week0 = 5.02 ± 1.19, week7 = 3.56 ± 1.18, <i>p</i> < 0.001); tDCS + TENS group experienced significantly greater improvements in foot clearance (week0 = 0.19 ± 0.04, week7 = 0.20 ± 0.03, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and crossing velocity (week0 = 0.53 ± 0.11, week7 = 0.62 ± 0.08, <i>p</i> < 0.001), compared to the TENS-only group (week0 = 0.17 ± 0.02, week7 = 0.17 ± 0.02, <i>p</i> < 0.001; week0 = 0.52 ± 0.09, week7 = 0.54 ± 0.09).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The combination of tDCS and TENS significantly outperformed TENS-only in reducing pain and enhancing gait adaptability during obstacle negotiation in older adults with KOA. These findings support the integration of tDCS as an adjunctive neuromodulatory strategy to amplify the therapeutic benefits of TENS in this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":12716,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Sports and Active Living","volume":"7 ","pages":"1631357"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12484165/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Sports and Active Living","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2025.1631357","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Older adults with knee osteoarthritis (KOA) exhibit an elevated risk of falls during obstacle negotiation, primarily due to pain-induced gait deviations. While transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) offers modest pain relief and limited gait modulation, combining it with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) may enhance the effects. This study evaluated the comparative efficacy of tDCS + TENS vs. TENS alone in mitigating pain and optimizing gait patterns during obstacle crossing in older adults with KOA.

Methods: Twenty-three participants with KOA (mean age: 67.6 ± 5.0 years; BMI: 25.9 ± 2.4 kg/m2) were randomized to either tDCS + TENS (n = 12; 7F/5M) or TENS-only (n = 11; 7F/4M) groups. Both interventions involved 20-minute sessions, administered thrice weekly for six weeks. Outcome measures included pain intensity (visual analog scale, VAS) and gait variables (foot clearance height, crossing velocity) assessed pre- (week 0) and post-intervention (week 7). Data were analyzed using mixed-design two-way ANOVAs with Bonferroni corrections.

Results: Statistically significant group-by-time interactions were observed for pain (p = 0.002, η 2 p = 0.378), foot clearance (p = 0.038, η 2 p = 0.190), and crossing velocity (p < 0.001, η 2 p = 0.588). post hoc analyses revealed that the tDCS + TENS group (week0 = 4.72 ± 1.01, week7 = 1.98 ± 0.88, p < 0.001) experienced significantly greater reductions in pain scores compared to the TENS-only group (week0 = 5.02 ± 1.19, week7 = 3.56 ± 1.18, p < 0.001); tDCS + TENS group experienced significantly greater improvements in foot clearance (week0 = 0.19 ± 0.04, week7 = 0.20 ± 0.03, p < 0.001) and crossing velocity (week0 = 0.53 ± 0.11, week7 = 0.62 ± 0.08, p < 0.001), compared to the TENS-only group (week0 = 0.17 ± 0.02, week7 = 0.17 ± 0.02, p < 0.001; week0 = 0.52 ± 0.09, week7 = 0.54 ± 0.09).

Conclusion: The combination of tDCS and TENS significantly outperformed TENS-only in reducing pain and enhancing gait adaptability during obstacle negotiation in older adults with KOA. These findings support the integration of tDCS as an adjunctive neuromodulatory strategy to amplify the therapeutic benefits of TENS in this population.

tDCS联合TENS在老年膝关节骨关节炎患者跨越障碍时缓解疼痛和改善步态模式的作用。
目的:患有膝骨关节炎(KOA)的老年人在过障时摔倒的风险增加,主要是由于疼痛引起的步态偏差。虽然经皮神经电刺激(TENS)可以适度缓解疼痛和有限的步态调节,但将其与经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)相结合可能会增强效果。本研究评估了tDCS + TENS与单独TENS在减轻老年KOA患者过障时疼痛和优化步态模式方面的比较疗效。方法:23例KOA患者(平均年龄:67.6±5.0岁,BMI: 25.9±2.4 kg/m2)随机分为tDCS + TENS组(n = 12; 7F/5M)和仅TENS组(n = 11; 7F/4M)。两种干预措施都是每次20分钟,每周进行三次,持续六周。结果测量包括疼痛强度(视觉模拟量表,VAS)和步态变量(足间隙高度,穿越速度)在干预前(第0周)和干预后(第7周)评估。数据分析采用Bonferroni校正的混合设计双向方差分析。结果:疼痛(p = 0.002, η 2 p = 0.378)、足部间隙(p = 0.038, η 2 p = 0.190)和穿越速度(p η 2 p = 0.588)组间交互作用有统计学意义。事后分析显示,tDCS + TENS组(第0周= 4.72±1.01,第7周= 1.98±0.88,p p p p p p p结论:tDCS + TENS在减轻老年KOA患者的疼痛和增强步态适应性方面明显优于单纯TENS。这些发现支持tDCS作为一种辅助神经调节策略的整合,以扩大TENS在该人群中的治疗效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
7.40%
发文量
459
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信