Effect of the consonant context on the corner vowel produced by native and Chinese speakers: based on AESOP corpora.

IF 2.9 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Frontiers in Psychology Pub Date : 2025-09-17 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1598904
Hongming Zhu
{"title":"Effect of the consonant context on the corner vowel produced by native and Chinese speakers: based on AESOP corpora.","authors":"Hongming Zhu","doi":"10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1598904","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study investigated the differences in the consonant context on the four corner vowels (/i/, /u/, /æ/, and /ɑ/) between native and Chinese speakers using the AESOP-ILAS 1 corpus dataset. Ninety-six test subjects with manually adjusted data comprising of 12 native speakers (the control group) and 84 non-native speakers (the targeted group), with 58 Chinese speakers (even gender distribution), 22 Taiwanese speakers (quasi-equal gender distribution), and 4 Hakka-speaking women, were chosen for the analysis. By adopting continuous speech initially, a general comparison of the vowel space for the native and the non-native speakers is presented. Next, the vowel space of the liquid and glide sonorants in the onset and the coda position are compared. The nasal sonorants are compared in their subsections. Finally, the study analyzed the obstructive sounds and compared the vowel spaces of different pronunciation sites (alveolar, labial, posterior alveolar, and palatal sounds). Since male speakers typically having longer vocal tracts, their vowels may be more centralized or lower in pronunciation compared to females. In order to comprehensively understand the spatial distribution of vowels, it is valuable to further analyze whether there are differences in vowel production patterns between male and female speakers in the native and non-native language groups. Compared to native speakers, Chinese English learners have a larger range of vowel spaces, which may be due to the fact that the corpus is collected from sentences rather than isolated words. Chinese learners exhibit lower F1 and F2 values on corner vowels, with particularly significant differences between /ɑ/ and /u/. These differences are influenced by adjacent phonemes, such as the/w/sound at the beginning and end of syllables. The study suggest that improving the stress distribution of Chinese learners in sentences will significantly enhance their pronunciation level.</p>","PeriodicalId":12525,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Psychology","volume":"16 ","pages":"1598904"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12483891/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1598904","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigated the differences in the consonant context on the four corner vowels (/i/, /u/, /æ/, and /ɑ/) between native and Chinese speakers using the AESOP-ILAS 1 corpus dataset. Ninety-six test subjects with manually adjusted data comprising of 12 native speakers (the control group) and 84 non-native speakers (the targeted group), with 58 Chinese speakers (even gender distribution), 22 Taiwanese speakers (quasi-equal gender distribution), and 4 Hakka-speaking women, were chosen for the analysis. By adopting continuous speech initially, a general comparison of the vowel space for the native and the non-native speakers is presented. Next, the vowel space of the liquid and glide sonorants in the onset and the coda position are compared. The nasal sonorants are compared in their subsections. Finally, the study analyzed the obstructive sounds and compared the vowel spaces of different pronunciation sites (alveolar, labial, posterior alveolar, and palatal sounds). Since male speakers typically having longer vocal tracts, their vowels may be more centralized or lower in pronunciation compared to females. In order to comprehensively understand the spatial distribution of vowels, it is valuable to further analyze whether there are differences in vowel production patterns between male and female speakers in the native and non-native language groups. Compared to native speakers, Chinese English learners have a larger range of vowel spaces, which may be due to the fact that the corpus is collected from sentences rather than isolated words. Chinese learners exhibit lower F1 and F2 values on corner vowels, with particularly significant differences between /ɑ/ and /u/. These differences are influenced by adjacent phonemes, such as the/w/sound at the beginning and end of syllables. The study suggest that improving the stress distribution of Chinese learners in sentences will significantly enhance their pronunciation level.

基于AESOP语料库的辅音语境对母语和汉语使用者产生角元音的影响
本研究利用AESOP-ILAS 1语料库数据,研究了母语和汉语使用者在辅音上下文中四个角元音(/i/、/u/、/æ/和/æ/)的差异。本研究共选取96名经人工调整数据的测试对象,包括12名母语使用者(对照组)和84名非母语使用者(目标组),其中58名中文使用者(性别均匀分布)、22名台湾使用者(性别准平等分布)和4名客家女性使用者。通过初步采用连续语音,对本族语和非本族语的元音空间进行了比较。然后,比较液体和滑音在开始和结束位置的元音空间。鼻音是在它们的子部分进行比较的。最后,研究分析了阻碍音,并比较了不同发音部位(肺泡音、唇音、后肺泡音和腭音)的元音间距。由于男性说话者通常有较长的声道,他们的元音可能比女性更集中或发音更低。为了全面了解元音的空间分布,进一步分析母语和非母语群体中男女说话者的元音产生模式是否存在差异是有价值的。与母语人士相比,中国英语学习者的元音空间范围更大,这可能是由于语料库是从句子中收集的,而不是孤立的单词。中国学习者在边角元音上的F1和F2值较低,其中/ j /和/u/的差异尤为显著。这些差异受到相邻音素的影响,比如音节开头和结尾的/w/音。研究表明,改善汉语学习者在句子中的重音分布将显著提高其发音水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Psychology
Frontiers in Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
13.20%
发文量
7396
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Psychology is the largest journal in its field, publishing rigorously peer-reviewed research across the psychological sciences, from clinical research to cognitive science, from perception to consciousness, from imaging studies to human factors, and from animal cognition to social psychology. Field Chief Editor Axel Cleeremans at the Free University of Brussels is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide. The journal publishes the best research across the entire field of psychology. Today, psychological science is becoming increasingly important at all levels of society, from the treatment of clinical disorders to our basic understanding of how the mind works. It is highly interdisciplinary, borrowing questions from philosophy, methods from neuroscience and insights from clinical practice - all in the goal of furthering our grasp of human nature and society, as well as our ability to develop new intervention methods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信