Limitations of biochemical methane potential testing in forecasting farm-scale digester performance under psychrotrophic conditions.

IF 2 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Glen Madrigal, Liz Quispe, Diyane Mango, Jaime Jaimes-Estévez, Oscar Mendieta, Liliana Castro-Molano, Humberto Escalante, Jaime Martí-Herrero
{"title":"Limitations of biochemical methane potential testing in forecasting farm-scale digester performance under psychrotrophic conditions.","authors":"Glen Madrigal, Liz Quispe, Diyane Mango, Jaime Jaimes-Estévez, Oscar Mendieta, Liliana Castro-Molano, Humberto Escalante, Jaime Martí-Herrero","doi":"10.1080/09593330.2025.2567079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study evaluated the extent to which laboratory-scale biochemical methane potential (BMP) assays predict actual methane production in a full-scale tubular anaerobic digester operating under psychrotrophic conditions. The 8 m³ farm-scale digester, situated in a cold, high-altitude climate, was retrofitted with passive solar heating, resulting in an average sludge temperature of 21.5 ± 1.2°C. In contrast, the mean ambient temperature was kept at 10.6 ± 1.4°C. BMP tests were conducted using the digester influent and effluent as substrate and inoculum, respectively, at mesophilic (35 ± 2°C) and psychrotrophic (23 ± 2°C) temperatures. The methane yield in the full-scale system (0.36 Nm³ CH₄ kg<sup>-</sup>¹ VS), operated at an average temperature of 21.5°C, significantly exceeded the values obtained in the batch BMP tests (0.19 Nm³ CH₄ kg<sup>-</sup>¹ VS at 35°C and 0.18 Nm³ CH₄ kg<sup>-</sup>¹ VS at 23°C). No statistically significant correlation was found between laboratory and field data. These findings show the limited predictive power of BMP testing for farm-scale digester performance in decentralized, low-temperature environments.</p>","PeriodicalId":12009,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Technology","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Technology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2025.2567079","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study evaluated the extent to which laboratory-scale biochemical methane potential (BMP) assays predict actual methane production in a full-scale tubular anaerobic digester operating under psychrotrophic conditions. The 8 m³ farm-scale digester, situated in a cold, high-altitude climate, was retrofitted with passive solar heating, resulting in an average sludge temperature of 21.5 ± 1.2°C. In contrast, the mean ambient temperature was kept at 10.6 ± 1.4°C. BMP tests were conducted using the digester influent and effluent as substrate and inoculum, respectively, at mesophilic (35 ± 2°C) and psychrotrophic (23 ± 2°C) temperatures. The methane yield in the full-scale system (0.36 Nm³ CH₄ kg-¹ VS), operated at an average temperature of 21.5°C, significantly exceeded the values obtained in the batch BMP tests (0.19 Nm³ CH₄ kg-¹ VS at 35°C and 0.18 Nm³ CH₄ kg-¹ VS at 23°C). No statistically significant correlation was found between laboratory and field data. These findings show the limited predictive power of BMP testing for farm-scale digester performance in decentralized, low-temperature environments.

生化甲烷电位测试在预测农场规模沼气池在精神营养条件下的性能方面的局限性。
本研究评估了实验室规模生化甲烷势(BMP)测定预测在全尺寸管式厌氧消化器在精神营养条件下运行的实际甲烷产量的程度。8立方米的农场规模沼气池位于寒冷的高海拔气候中,采用被动式太阳能采暖改造,平均污泥温度为21.5±1.2°C。环境平均温度保持在10.6±1.4℃。在中温(35±2°C)和精神营养(23±2°C)温度下,分别以消化池进水和出水作为底物和接种物进行BMP试验。在平均温度为21.5℃的条件下,完整体系的甲烷产率(0.36 Nm³CH₄kg-¹VS)显著超过了批量BMP试验(35℃时为0.19 Nm³CH₄kg-¹VS, 23℃时为0.18 Nm³CH₄kg-¹VS)。在实验室和现场数据之间没有发现统计学上显著的相关性。这些发现表明,在分散的低温环境中,BMP测试对农场规模消化器性能的预测能力有限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental Technology
Environmental Technology 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
3.60%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Technology is a leading journal for the rapid publication of science and technology papers on a wide range of topics in applied environmental studies, from environmental engineering to environmental biotechnology, the circular economy, municipal and industrial wastewater management, drinking-water treatment, air- and water-pollution control, solid-waste management, industrial hygiene and associated technologies. Environmental Technology is intended to provide rapid publication of new developments in environmental technology. The journal has an international readership with a broad scientific base. Contributions will be accepted from scientists and engineers in industry, government and universities. Accepted manuscripts are generally published within four months. Please note that Environmental Technology does not publish any review papers unless for a specified special issue which is decided by the Editor. Please do submit your review papers to our sister journal Environmental Technology Reviews at http://www.tandfonline.com/toc/tetr20/current
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信