Ke Zhang, Jun Lin, Jianghua Zheng, Xuan Li, Li Xu, Liang Liu, Xuan Liu, Xi Jin, Rong Fu, Xinwei Wang, Yunzhi Sang, Xiaoyu Guo
{"title":"Evaluating Climate Change Effects on Swan Habitats Within China: Adaptive Strategies for Sustainable Conservation","authors":"Ke Zhang, Jun Lin, Jianghua Zheng, Xuan Li, Li Xu, Liang Liu, Xuan Liu, Xi Jin, Rong Fu, Xinwei Wang, Yunzhi Sang, Xiaoyu Guo","doi":"10.1002/ece3.72238","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Under the combined pressures of global climate change and human activities, swan habitats in China are facing severe threats, posing direct challenges to the effectiveness of existing protected areas. However, the dynamic changes in the distribution of swan habitats and conservation coverage under climate change remain insufficiently explored. In this study, we focused on three widely distributed swan species in China—<i>Cygnus cygnus</i> (Whooper Swan), <i>Cygnus columbianus</i> (Bewick's Swan), and <i>Cygnus olor</i> (Mute Swan). Using the maximum entropy (MaxEnt) model, we projected the spatial distribution patterns of their habitats and the trends in conservation rates under recent period (2001–2020) and future periods (2021–2040 and 2041–2060) across three Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSP1–2.6, SSP2–4.5, and SSP5–8.5). The results indicated that the MaxEnt model performed well, with mean values of training and testing area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.966 and 0.956, respectively, and a mean true skill statistic (TSS) of 0.833 across all periods. Slope, NDVI, proximity to water, and isothermality (Bio3) were identified as the key environmental variables jointly influencing the distribution of the three swan species. During the recent period, the total suitable habitat areas of the three swan species were 44.89 × 10<sup>4</sup>, 54.18 × 10<sup>4</sup>, and 48.33 × 10<sup>4</sup> km<sup>2</sup>, respectively. Under future scenarios, overall habitat ranges remained relatively stable, but the suitability structure shifted, with low suitability habitats showing greater fluctuations. In terms of conservation coverage, the overall conservation rate of suitable habitats for all three species remained below 11%. Coverage of highly suitable habitats was higher than that of moderately and low suitable habitats, but protection gaps persisted, especially for Whooper Swan and Bewick's Swan. These findings highlight significant mismatches between swan habitats and reserve networks and provide a scientific basis for optimizing conservation planning and adaptive management under climate change.</p>","PeriodicalId":11467,"journal":{"name":"Ecology and Evolution","volume":"15 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12486193/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecology and Evolution","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ece3.72238","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Under the combined pressures of global climate change and human activities, swan habitats in China are facing severe threats, posing direct challenges to the effectiveness of existing protected areas. However, the dynamic changes in the distribution of swan habitats and conservation coverage under climate change remain insufficiently explored. In this study, we focused on three widely distributed swan species in China—Cygnus cygnus (Whooper Swan), Cygnus columbianus (Bewick's Swan), and Cygnus olor (Mute Swan). Using the maximum entropy (MaxEnt) model, we projected the spatial distribution patterns of their habitats and the trends in conservation rates under recent period (2001–2020) and future periods (2021–2040 and 2041–2060) across three Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSP1–2.6, SSP2–4.5, and SSP5–8.5). The results indicated that the MaxEnt model performed well, with mean values of training and testing area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.966 and 0.956, respectively, and a mean true skill statistic (TSS) of 0.833 across all periods. Slope, NDVI, proximity to water, and isothermality (Bio3) were identified as the key environmental variables jointly influencing the distribution of the three swan species. During the recent period, the total suitable habitat areas of the three swan species were 44.89 × 104, 54.18 × 104, and 48.33 × 104 km2, respectively. Under future scenarios, overall habitat ranges remained relatively stable, but the suitability structure shifted, with low suitability habitats showing greater fluctuations. In terms of conservation coverage, the overall conservation rate of suitable habitats for all three species remained below 11%. Coverage of highly suitable habitats was higher than that of moderately and low suitable habitats, but protection gaps persisted, especially for Whooper Swan and Bewick's Swan. These findings highlight significant mismatches between swan habitats and reserve networks and provide a scientific basis for optimizing conservation planning and adaptive management under climate change.
期刊介绍:
Ecology and Evolution is the peer reviewed journal for rapid dissemination of research in all areas of ecology, evolution and conservation science. The journal gives priority to quality research reports, theoretical or empirical, that develop our understanding of organisms and their diversity, interactions between them, and the natural environment.
Ecology and Evolution gives prompt and equal consideration to papers reporting theoretical, experimental, applied and descriptive work in terrestrial and aquatic environments. The journal will consider submissions across taxa in areas including but not limited to micro and macro ecological and evolutionary processes, characteristics of and interactions between individuals, populations, communities and the environment, physiological responses to environmental change, population genetics and phylogenetics, relatedness and kin selection, life histories, systematics and taxonomy, conservation genetics, extinction, speciation, adaption, behaviour, biodiversity, species abundance, macroecology, population and ecosystem dynamics, and conservation policy.