Comparative Cleansing Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Bowel Preparation Agents in Pediatric Patients: A Network and Proportional Meta-Analyses of Randomized Controlled Trials.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Wei-Ti Hsu, Tao-Wei Ke, Chein-Yu Kuo, Mei-Ling Shen, Shih-Ya Hung
{"title":"Comparative Cleansing Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Bowel Preparation Agents in Pediatric Patients: A Network and Proportional Meta-Analyses of Randomized Controlled Trials.","authors":"Wei-Ti Hsu, Tao-Wei Ke, Chein-Yu Kuo, Mei-Ling Shen, Shih-Ya Hung","doi":"10.1007/s10620-025-09442-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aims: </strong>Efficient bowel preparation is essential for high-quality visualization and lesion detection during colonoscopy. In children, bowel cleansing is often challenging due to age-related physiology, poor palatability of agents, and low tolerability. The optimal regimen remains uncertain. We aimed to compare the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of bowel-cleansing agents in children.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a network and proportional meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) retrieved through May 2025 from PubMed and Embase. The primary outcome was bowel cleansing efficacy, measured by validated preparation scales. Secondary outcomes included safety and tolerability. Polyethylene glycol electrolyte lavage solution (PEG-ELS) served as the reference comparator.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty RCTs (2,468 subjects) were included. Polyethylene glycol 3350 (PEG-3350 or Miralax) demonstrated the highest cleansing efficacy (92.3%). Other regimens, including PEG-ELS + bisacodyl, sodium picosulfate with magnesium citrate, PEG-ELS + enema, PEG-ELS + ascorbic acid, and normal saline, also achieved adequate bowel preparation (> 80%) in the proportional meta-analysis; however, the latter two were evaluated in single studies. The network meta-analysis of safety outcomes revealed no significant differences in abdominal pain among agents. Furthermore, sodium picosulfate with magnesium citrate exhibited the lowest rates of nausea/vomiting and ranked highest in tolerability. Notably, the two small RCTs evaluating PEG-3350 (Miralax) reported safety outcomes but did not include tolerability data.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Sodium picosulfate with magnesium citrate offers the most favorable balance of efficacy, safety, and tolerability for pediatric colonoscopy preparation. PEG-3350 (Miralax) may be considered when maximized cleansing is the goal, but additional efficacy and tolerability data in children are needed. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42024508556.</p>","PeriodicalId":11378,"journal":{"name":"Digestive Diseases and Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digestive Diseases and Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-025-09442-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/aims: Efficient bowel preparation is essential for high-quality visualization and lesion detection during colonoscopy. In children, bowel cleansing is often challenging due to age-related physiology, poor palatability of agents, and low tolerability. The optimal regimen remains uncertain. We aimed to compare the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of bowel-cleansing agents in children.

Methods: We conducted a network and proportional meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) retrieved through May 2025 from PubMed and Embase. The primary outcome was bowel cleansing efficacy, measured by validated preparation scales. Secondary outcomes included safety and tolerability. Polyethylene glycol electrolyte lavage solution (PEG-ELS) served as the reference comparator.

Results: Twenty RCTs (2,468 subjects) were included. Polyethylene glycol 3350 (PEG-3350 or Miralax) demonstrated the highest cleansing efficacy (92.3%). Other regimens, including PEG-ELS + bisacodyl, sodium picosulfate with magnesium citrate, PEG-ELS + enema, PEG-ELS + ascorbic acid, and normal saline, also achieved adequate bowel preparation (> 80%) in the proportional meta-analysis; however, the latter two were evaluated in single studies. The network meta-analysis of safety outcomes revealed no significant differences in abdominal pain among agents. Furthermore, sodium picosulfate with magnesium citrate exhibited the lowest rates of nausea/vomiting and ranked highest in tolerability. Notably, the two small RCTs evaluating PEG-3350 (Miralax) reported safety outcomes but did not include tolerability data.

Conclusion: Sodium picosulfate with magnesium citrate offers the most favorable balance of efficacy, safety, and tolerability for pediatric colonoscopy preparation. PEG-3350 (Miralax) may be considered when maximized cleansing is the goal, but additional efficacy and tolerability data in children are needed. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42024508556.

儿科患者肠道制剂的比较清洁功效、安全性和耐受性:随机对照试验的网络和比例荟萃分析。
背景/目的:在结肠镜检查中,高效的肠道准备对于高质量的可视化和病变检测至关重要。在儿童中,由于年龄相关的生理,药物的适口性差和耐受性低,肠道清洁通常具有挑战性。最佳方案仍不确定。我们的目的是比较儿童肠道清洁剂的疗效、安全性和耐受性。方法:我们对截至2025年5月从PubMed和Embase检索的随机对照试验(rct)进行了网络和比例荟萃分析。主要结果是肠道清洁效果,通过有效的制剂量表来测量。次要结局包括安全性和耐受性。聚乙二醇电解质灌洗液(PEG-ELS)作为参比物。结果:共纳入20项rct(2468名受试者)。聚乙二醇3350 (PEG-3350或Miralax)表现出最高的清洁效果(92.3%)。在比例荟萃分析中,其他方案,包括PEG-ELS + bisacodyl、picosulfate钠与柠檬酸镁、PEG-ELS +灌肠、PEG-ELS +抗坏血酸和生理盐水,也达到了充分的肠道准备(> 80%);然而,后两者是在单一研究中评估的。安全性结果的网络荟萃分析显示,各药物在腹痛方面没有显著差异。此外,picosulfate钠和柠檬酸镁的恶心/呕吐率最低,耐受性最高。值得注意的是,两项评估PEG-3350 (Miralax)的小型随机对照试验报告了安全性结果,但没有包括耐受性数据。结论:pico硫酸钠与柠檬酸镁在儿童结肠镜检查制剂的疗效、安全性和耐受性方面提供了最有利的平衡。当以最大限度的清洁为目标时,可以考虑使用PEG-3350 (Miralax),但需要额外的儿童疗效和耐受性数据。普洛斯彼罗注册号:CRD42024508556。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Digestive Diseases and Sciences
Digestive Diseases and Sciences 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
3.20%
发文量
420
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Digestive Diseases and Sciences publishes high-quality, peer-reviewed, original papers addressing aspects of basic/translational and clinical research in gastroenterology, hepatology, and related fields. This well-illustrated journal features comprehensive coverage of basic pathophysiology, new technological advances, and clinical breakthroughs; insights from prominent academicians and practitioners concerning new scientific developments and practical medical issues; and discussions focusing on the latest changes in local and worldwide social, economic, and governmental policies that affect the delivery of care within the disciplines of gastroenterology and hepatology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信