Adopting the lens of the COM-B behaviour change model to qualitatively explore and understand public health implications of young adults' attitudes towards death-talk.

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Catrin Morgan-Duggan, Joanna Brooks, Lisa Graham-Wisener, Christine Rowland
{"title":"Adopting the lens of the COM-B behaviour change model to qualitatively explore and understand public health implications of young adults' attitudes towards death-talk.","authors":"Catrin Morgan-Duggan, Joanna Brooks, Lisa Graham-Wisener, Christine Rowland","doi":"10.1186/s12889-025-24519-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The topic of death and dying holds universal significance, yet societal norms often discourage open discussions, leading to a culture of death-denial. This reluctance can hinder informed decision-making, end-of-life planning, and access to adequate care and grief support. While research has examined death-talk among older adults, clinical populations and healthcare professionals, young adults' perspectives remain underexplored. Understanding their attitudes is crucial, as early engagement with death-talk - framed within a life-course approach - can foster emotional resilience and contribute to developing compassionate communities. This study aims to explore the perceptions and attitudes of a non-clinical sample of young adults (aged 18-34) towards discussing death and dying.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A qualitative approach was employed, involving four focus groups with 33 young adults. Participants were selected using maximum variation sampling to ensure diversity in education, ethnicity, gender, and religious beliefs. Reflexive thematic analysis was performed to identify themes related to attitudes toward death-talk, utilising a critical realist stance. Findings were mapped using the Capabilities, Opportunities, Motivations, and Behaviour (COM-B) model of behaviour change, to identify potentially modifiable barriers and facilitators to engaging in death-talk.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis revealed four key themes which collectively illustrate the complex interplay between individual attitudes and broader cultural influences in shaping how young adults perceive and discuss death and dying. The themes highlighted how internal and external factors affect the ability and willingness of young adults to engage in meaningful discussions about death. Factors such as social stigma, fear of causing distress, and a lack of communication skills were identified as significant barriers. Conversely, the recognition of the importance of death-talk, personal experiences with bereavement, and a supportive social environment were found to facilitate these discussions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study provides valuable insights into the perceptions and experiences of death-talk amongst young adults, including barriers and facilitators. The findings suggest the need for targeted interventions to enhance death literacy among young people, emphasising the importance of normalising these conversations in everyday life. Recommendations are proposed for utilising these insights to inform public health strategies, education, and policy development aimed at fostering a more open dialogue about death and dying within the broader community.</p>","PeriodicalId":9039,"journal":{"name":"BMC Public Health","volume":"25 1","pages":"3307"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-025-24519-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The topic of death and dying holds universal significance, yet societal norms often discourage open discussions, leading to a culture of death-denial. This reluctance can hinder informed decision-making, end-of-life planning, and access to adequate care and grief support. While research has examined death-talk among older adults, clinical populations and healthcare professionals, young adults' perspectives remain underexplored. Understanding their attitudes is crucial, as early engagement with death-talk - framed within a life-course approach - can foster emotional resilience and contribute to developing compassionate communities. This study aims to explore the perceptions and attitudes of a non-clinical sample of young adults (aged 18-34) towards discussing death and dying.

Methods: A qualitative approach was employed, involving four focus groups with 33 young adults. Participants were selected using maximum variation sampling to ensure diversity in education, ethnicity, gender, and religious beliefs. Reflexive thematic analysis was performed to identify themes related to attitudes toward death-talk, utilising a critical realist stance. Findings were mapped using the Capabilities, Opportunities, Motivations, and Behaviour (COM-B) model of behaviour change, to identify potentially modifiable barriers and facilitators to engaging in death-talk.

Results: The analysis revealed four key themes which collectively illustrate the complex interplay between individual attitudes and broader cultural influences in shaping how young adults perceive and discuss death and dying. The themes highlighted how internal and external factors affect the ability and willingness of young adults to engage in meaningful discussions about death. Factors such as social stigma, fear of causing distress, and a lack of communication skills were identified as significant barriers. Conversely, the recognition of the importance of death-talk, personal experiences with bereavement, and a supportive social environment were found to facilitate these discussions.

Conclusions: This study provides valuable insights into the perceptions and experiences of death-talk amongst young adults, including barriers and facilitators. The findings suggest the need for targeted interventions to enhance death literacy among young people, emphasising the importance of normalising these conversations in everyday life. Recommendations are proposed for utilising these insights to inform public health strategies, education, and policy development aimed at fostering a more open dialogue about death and dying within the broader community.

采用COM-B行为改变模型的视角,定性地探讨和理解年轻人对死亡谈话的态度对公共卫生的影响。
背景:死亡和临终的话题具有普遍意义,然而社会规范往往不鼓励公开讨论,导致了一种否认死亡的文化。这种不情愿会阻碍明智的决策,临终计划,以及获得适当的护理和悲伤支持。虽然有研究调查了老年人、临床人群和医疗保健专业人员的死亡谈话,但年轻人的观点仍未得到充分探讨。了解他们的态度是至关重要的,因为早期参与死亡谈话——在生命历程的框架内——可以培养情感弹性,并有助于发展富有同情心的社区。本研究旨在探讨一个非临床样本的年轻人(18-34岁)对讨论死亡和临终的看法和态度。方法:采用定性研究方法,分为4个焦点小组,共33名青壮年。参与者的选择采用最大变异抽样,以确保教育、种族、性别和宗教信仰的多样性。利用批判现实主义立场,进行反身性主题分析,以确定与对死亡谈话的态度有关的主题。研究结果使用行为改变的能力、机会、动机和行为(COM-B)模型进行映射,以确定参与死亡谈话的潜在可修改障碍和促进因素。结果:分析揭示了四个关键主题,它们共同说明了个人态度和更广泛的文化影响之间复杂的相互作用,影响了年轻人如何看待和讨论死亡和临终。这些主题强调了内部和外部因素如何影响年轻人参与有关死亡的有意义讨论的能力和意愿。社会耻辱、害怕造成痛苦以及缺乏沟通技巧等因素被认为是重大障碍。相反,对死亡谈话重要性的认识、丧亲之痛的个人经历以及支持性的社会环境有助于这些讨论。结论:本研究对年轻人死亡谈话的感知和经历提供了有价值的见解,包括障碍和促进因素。研究结果表明,需要有针对性的干预措施来提高年轻人的死亡素养,强调在日常生活中使这些对话正常化的重要性。提出了利用这些见解为公共卫生战略、教育和政策制定提供信息的建议,旨在促进在更广泛的社区内就死亡和濒死问题进行更公开的对话。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Public Health
BMC Public Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
4.40%
发文量
2108
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: BMC Public Health is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on the epidemiology of disease and the understanding of all aspects of public health. The journal has a special focus on the social determinants of health, the environmental, behavioral, and occupational correlates of health and disease, and the impact of health policies, practices and interventions on the community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信