Molecular characterisation of tick-borne pathogens in cattle in kenya: insights from blood, ticks, and skin swab analyses.

IF 2.6 2区 农林科学 Q1 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Dennis Getange, Samson Mukaratirwa, Joel L Bargul, Rua Khogali, John Ng'iela, James Kabii, Daniel K Masiga, Jandouwe Villinger
{"title":"Molecular characterisation of tick-borne pathogens in cattle in kenya: insights from blood, ticks, and skin swab analyses.","authors":"Dennis Getange, Samson Mukaratirwa, Joel L Bargul, Rua Khogali, John Ng'iela, James Kabii, Daniel K Masiga, Jandouwe Villinger","doi":"10.1186/s12917-025-05014-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ticks pose a major threat to livestock and human health in sub-Saharan Africa, with climate change and pastoral movements fueling their spread. Few studies have integrated multiple sample types to characterize tick-borne pathogens (TBPs) in cattle in Kenya. This knowledge gap hinders the development of effective surveillance and control strategies, leaving vulnerable populations and their livestock susceptible to these persistent threats.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We screened 280 bovine blood samples, 589 tick pools, and 284 non-invasive skin swabs from cattle in northern (Marsabit) and southern (Kajiado) Kenya by high-resolution melting analysis and Sanger sequencing of PCR products.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Rhipicephalus spp. (47.1%), Hyalomma spp. (30.8%), and Amblyomma spp. (22.1%) were prevalent, with Rhipicephalus evertsi only found in Kajiado and Rhipicephalus camicasi in Marsabit. In blood, Anaplasma spp. (62.9%; A. marginale, A. platys, A. ovis) and Theileria spp. (34.6%; T. velifera, T. mutans) were dominant. Tick pools harbored Coxiella burnetii, Rickettsia africae, Rickettsia aeschlimannii, Anaplasma marginale, Theileria velifera, T. ovis, and Babesia occultans, and for the first time two co-circulating Ehrlichia ruminantium strains (Welgevonden and Kumm2). Notably, C. burnetii and T. ovis were detected only in Marsabit, and T. mutans only in Kajiado. Skin swabs from tick predilection sites (ears, anal region) yielded R. africae, R. aeschlimannii, and T. velifera at low positivity, while nose swabs were negative.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Detection of zoonotic pathogens such as C. burnetii and R. africae underscores critical public health risks, and co-infections in cattle reinforce the need for robust, integrated surveillance. Although skin swabs demonstrated limited diagnostic yield, they remain a promising non-invasive sampling approach. These findings highlight the value of targeted acarological research and coordinated control programs under a One Health framework.</p>","PeriodicalId":9041,"journal":{"name":"BMC Veterinary Research","volume":"21 1","pages":"552"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Veterinary Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-025-05014-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Ticks pose a major threat to livestock and human health in sub-Saharan Africa, with climate change and pastoral movements fueling their spread. Few studies have integrated multiple sample types to characterize tick-borne pathogens (TBPs) in cattle in Kenya. This knowledge gap hinders the development of effective surveillance and control strategies, leaving vulnerable populations and their livestock susceptible to these persistent threats.

Methods: We screened 280 bovine blood samples, 589 tick pools, and 284 non-invasive skin swabs from cattle in northern (Marsabit) and southern (Kajiado) Kenya by high-resolution melting analysis and Sanger sequencing of PCR products.

Results: Rhipicephalus spp. (47.1%), Hyalomma spp. (30.8%), and Amblyomma spp. (22.1%) were prevalent, with Rhipicephalus evertsi only found in Kajiado and Rhipicephalus camicasi in Marsabit. In blood, Anaplasma spp. (62.9%; A. marginale, A. platys, A. ovis) and Theileria spp. (34.6%; T. velifera, T. mutans) were dominant. Tick pools harbored Coxiella burnetii, Rickettsia africae, Rickettsia aeschlimannii, Anaplasma marginale, Theileria velifera, T. ovis, and Babesia occultans, and for the first time two co-circulating Ehrlichia ruminantium strains (Welgevonden and Kumm2). Notably, C. burnetii and T. ovis were detected only in Marsabit, and T. mutans only in Kajiado. Skin swabs from tick predilection sites (ears, anal region) yielded R. africae, R. aeschlimannii, and T. velifera at low positivity, while nose swabs were negative.

Conclusions: Detection of zoonotic pathogens such as C. burnetii and R. africae underscores critical public health risks, and co-infections in cattle reinforce the need for robust, integrated surveillance. Although skin swabs demonstrated limited diagnostic yield, they remain a promising non-invasive sampling approach. These findings highlight the value of targeted acarological research and coordinated control programs under a One Health framework.

肯尼亚牛中蜱传病原体的分子特征:来自血液、蜱和皮肤拭子分析的见解。
背景:蜱对撒哈拉以南非洲地区的牲畜和人类健康构成重大威胁,气候变化和牧民流动加剧了它们的传播。很少有研究整合了多种样本类型来表征肯尼亚牛的蜱传病原体(tbp)。这种知识差距阻碍了有效监测和控制战略的制定,使脆弱人口及其牲畜容易受到这些持续威胁的影响。方法:采用高分辨率熔融分析和PCR产物Sanger测序方法,对肯尼亚北部(Marsabit)和南部()牛的280份血液样本、589份蜱虫池和284份非侵入性皮肤拭子进行筛选。结果:在马萨比特地区,主要有鼻头虫(47.1%)、透明虫(30.8%)和无眼虫(22.1%),而在马萨比特地区,仅发现异头虫和马萨比特地区仅发现异头虫。血中以无原体(62.9%,边缘、桔形、紫斑拟蚊)和红僵菌(34.6%,绒毛、变形拟蚊)为优势种。蜱虫池中有伯氏克谢氏体、非洲立克次体、艾氏立克次体、边缘无形体、velieria veliferera、T. ovis和隐匿巴贝斯虫,并首次有两种共同传播的反刍埃利希体菌株(Welgevonden和Kumm2)。值得注意的是,burnetii和T. ovis仅在Marsabit中检测到,而T. mutans仅在北京地区检测到。蜱虫偏好部位(耳朵、肛门区)的皮肤拭子检出非洲R.、埃斯克里曼R.和白腹T.,阳性率低,鼻拭子检出阴性。结论:伯纳蒂c和非洲r等人畜共患病原体的检测突出了重大的公共卫生风险,牛的合并感染加强了强有力的综合监测的必要性。虽然皮肤拭子的诊断率有限,但它们仍然是一种很有前途的非侵入性取样方法。这些发现突出了在“同一个健康”框架下进行有针对性的心脏病学研究和协调控制规划的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Veterinary Research
BMC Veterinary Research VETERINARY SCIENCES-
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.80%
发文量
420
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Veterinary Research is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of veterinary science and medicine, including the epidemiology, diagnosis, prevention and treatment of medical conditions of domestic, companion, farm and wild animals, as well as the biomedical processes that underlie their health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信