Interest in complementary and alternative medicine among participants in a study on cancer prevention by green tea extract - results from an expert-based survey of MIRACLE trial participants.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q1 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE
Anna Melzer, Niklas Sturm, Friederike Rohlmann, Rainer Muche, Julia Stingl, Thomas J Ettrich, Thomas Seufferlein
{"title":"Interest in complementary and alternative medicine among participants in a study on cancer prevention by green tea extract - results from an expert-based survey of MIRACLE trial participants.","authors":"Anna Melzer, Niklas Sturm, Friederike Rohlmann, Rainer Muche, Julia Stingl, Thomas J Ettrich, Thomas Seufferlein","doi":"10.1186/s12906-025-05087-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Although chemopreventive strategies such as acetylsalicylic acid have shown potential in cancer prevention, they also entail adverse effects. This leads to growing interest in \"natural\" compounds, such as plant-based extracts, which may offer preventive benefits with fewer side effects. However, little is known aboutindividuals' personal attitudes towards conventional medications and complementary or alternative therapies when they are eligible for various cancer screening and prevention programmes. The present study aims to investigate the attitude toward medications and various therapies, as well as their prescription, among subjects participating in a clinical trial on the prevention of colorectal adenomas using green tea extract. A further goal was to assess whether the study predominantly attracted individuals with a strong preference for natural products or a more diverse set of opinions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>992 participants (age 50-80 years) of the MIRACLE study (a randomised study comparing green tea extract vs. placebo for secondary prevention of colorectal adenomas, NCT01360320) in 40 study centres across Germany received a 25-item, expert-based questionnaire regarding their attitude towards different medications and therapies including complementary and alternative medicine. Basic characteristics including age, gender, ECOG status, and lifestyle factors were also recorded. An exploratory factor analysis was used to group the items into eight thematic areas, which were then analysed for potential associations with the participants' baseline characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Response rate to the questionnaire was 94.3% (935/992). Survey participants mainly expressed positive attitudes towards both conventional and complementary medicine. Most were open to genetic testing for personalised treatment. Comparing the categories of the exploratory factor analysis revealed that female gender and regular exercise were associated with the regular use of alternative healing methods (i.e. acupuncture or homeopathic medicine). A more favourable view of alternative approaches was more common among younger and better-educated individuals, but the same groups also rated conventional medicine less negatively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings of this study reveal a relatively high level of openness towards both conventional and alternative medicine among participants of the MIRACLE trial, as well as certain features, such as age, gender, and education that impact on the attitude towards medications and therapies among participants in a study on secondary prevention of colorectal polyps by green tea extract.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01360320.</p>","PeriodicalId":9128,"journal":{"name":"BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies","volume":"25 1","pages":"350"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12490030/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12906-025-05087-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Although chemopreventive strategies such as acetylsalicylic acid have shown potential in cancer prevention, they also entail adverse effects. This leads to growing interest in "natural" compounds, such as plant-based extracts, which may offer preventive benefits with fewer side effects. However, little is known aboutindividuals' personal attitudes towards conventional medications and complementary or alternative therapies when they are eligible for various cancer screening and prevention programmes. The present study aims to investigate the attitude toward medications and various therapies, as well as their prescription, among subjects participating in a clinical trial on the prevention of colorectal adenomas using green tea extract. A further goal was to assess whether the study predominantly attracted individuals with a strong preference for natural products or a more diverse set of opinions.

Methods: 992 participants (age 50-80 years) of the MIRACLE study (a randomised study comparing green tea extract vs. placebo for secondary prevention of colorectal adenomas, NCT01360320) in 40 study centres across Germany received a 25-item, expert-based questionnaire regarding their attitude towards different medications and therapies including complementary and alternative medicine. Basic characteristics including age, gender, ECOG status, and lifestyle factors were also recorded. An exploratory factor analysis was used to group the items into eight thematic areas, which were then analysed for potential associations with the participants' baseline characteristics.

Results: Response rate to the questionnaire was 94.3% (935/992). Survey participants mainly expressed positive attitudes towards both conventional and complementary medicine. Most were open to genetic testing for personalised treatment. Comparing the categories of the exploratory factor analysis revealed that female gender and regular exercise were associated with the regular use of alternative healing methods (i.e. acupuncture or homeopathic medicine). A more favourable view of alternative approaches was more common among younger and better-educated individuals, but the same groups also rated conventional medicine less negatively.

Conclusion: The findings of this study reveal a relatively high level of openness towards both conventional and alternative medicine among participants of the MIRACLE trial, as well as certain features, such as age, gender, and education that impact on the attitude towards medications and therapies among participants in a study on secondary prevention of colorectal polyps by green tea extract.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01360320.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

在绿茶提取物预防癌症的研究中,参与者对补充和替代医学的兴趣-来自MIRACLE试验参与者的专家调查结果。
目的:虽然化学预防策略如乙酰水杨酸已显示出预防癌症的潜力,但它们也会带来不良反应。这导致人们对“天然”化合物越来越感兴趣,比如植物提取物,它可能提供预防作用,副作用更少。然而,当人们有资格接受各种癌症筛查和预防计划时,人们对传统药物和补充或替代疗法的态度却知之甚少。本研究旨在调查参与绿茶提取物预防结直肠腺瘤临床试验的受试者对药物、各种治疗方法及其处方的态度。进一步的目标是评估这项研究是否主要吸引了对天然产品有强烈偏好的人,还是吸引了更多样化的观点。方法:德国40个研究中心的992名MIRACLE研究(一项比较绿茶提取物和安慰剂对结直肠腺瘤二级预防的随机研究,NCT01360320)的参与者(年龄50-80岁)收到了一份25项的专家问卷,调查他们对不同药物和疗法的态度,包括补充和替代药物。基本特征包括年龄、性别、ECOG状态和生活方式因素。探索性因素分析用于将项目分为八个主题领域,然后分析与参与者基线特征的潜在关联。结果:问卷回收率为94.3%(935/992)。调查参与者主要对传统医学和补充医学持积极态度。大多数人都愿意接受基因检测以进行个性化治疗。比较探索性因素分析的类别显示,女性性别和定期运动与定期使用替代治疗方法(即针灸或顺势疗法药物)有关。年轻人和受教育程度较高的人对替代方法的看法更为普遍,但同样的人群对传统医学的负面评价也较少。结论:本研究的结果揭示了MIRACLE试验参与者对传统和替代医学的相对较高的开放性,以及年龄、性别和教育程度等某些特征,这些特征影响了绿茶提取物二级预防结直肠息肉研究参与者对药物和治疗的态度。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01360320。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE-
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.60%
发文量
300
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信