Fluctuations in the optimal sensorimotor mu-rhythm phase associated with high corticospinal excitability during TMS-EEG.

IF 8.4 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Juliana R Hougland, Miriam Kirchhoff, David E Vetter, Oskari Ahola, Andreas Jooß, Dania Humaidan, Ulf Ziemann
{"title":"Fluctuations in the optimal sensorimotor mu-rhythm phase associated with high corticospinal excitability during TMS-EEG.","authors":"Juliana R Hougland, Miriam Kirchhoff, David E Vetter, Oskari Ahola, Andreas Jooß, Dania Humaidan, Ulf Ziemann","doi":"10.1016/j.brs.2025.09.019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) applied to the primary motor cortex (M1) targeting the sensorimotor mu-rhythm trough phase has been associated with higher corticospinal excitability than during the peak phase, as measured by the amplitude of motor evoked potentials (MEP). However, this phase-dependent effect varies across studies and individuals.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To explore the stability of the mu-phase effect. We investigated potential inter- and intrasession fluctuations in the optimal mu-phase associated with high corticospinal excitability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We applied brain state-independently 800 single TMS pulses to left M1 in 60 participants. For the analysis, participants were classified into two groups based on the significance/insignificance of the phase effect. We assessed the stability of the optimal phase using entropy and a novel phase-MEP stability metric. We evaluated how well the MEP amplitude can be predicted from mu-phase, mu-power, and their interaction using a linear mixed effects model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our results showed that, for the significant phase effect group only, phases around trough elicited significantly larger MEPs than at peak. The optimal phase varied in both groups, but remained primarily around the trough in participants with a significant phase effect. Mu-power positively correlated with MEP amplitudes in both groups. In a second experiment, 10 participants completed two sessions and showed low test-retest reliability of the mu-phase effect.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings confirm that mu-phase and mu-power modulate corticospinal excitability. Individual inter-session variability and within-session fluctuations limit the generalizability of fixed-phase targeting. Future closed-loop TMS protocols may benefit from real-time adaptive algorithms to optimize stimulation efficacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":9206,"journal":{"name":"Brain Stimulation","volume":" ","pages":"1843-1851"},"PeriodicalIF":8.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain Stimulation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2025.09.019","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) applied to the primary motor cortex (M1) targeting the sensorimotor mu-rhythm trough phase has been associated with higher corticospinal excitability than during the peak phase, as measured by the amplitude of motor evoked potentials (MEP). However, this phase-dependent effect varies across studies and individuals.

Objectives: To explore the stability of the mu-phase effect. We investigated potential inter- and intrasession fluctuations in the optimal mu-phase associated with high corticospinal excitability.

Methods: We applied brain state-independently 800 single TMS pulses to left M1 in 60 participants. For the analysis, participants were classified into two groups based on the significance/insignificance of the phase effect. We assessed the stability of the optimal phase using entropy and a novel phase-MEP stability metric. We evaluated how well the MEP amplitude can be predicted from mu-phase, mu-power, and their interaction using a linear mixed effects model.

Results: Our results showed that, for the significant phase effect group only, phases around trough elicited significantly larger MEPs than at peak. The optimal phase varied in both groups, but remained primarily around the trough in participants with a significant phase effect. Mu-power positively correlated with MEP amplitudes in both groups. In a second experiment, 10 participants completed two sessions and showed low test-retest reliability of the mu-phase effect.

Conclusions: Our findings confirm that mu-phase and mu-power modulate corticospinal excitability. Individual inter-session variability and within-session fluctuations limit the generalizability of fixed-phase targeting. Future closed-loop TMS protocols may benefit from real-time adaptive algorithms to optimize stimulation efficacy.

TMS-EEG期间与高皮质脊髓兴奋性相关的最佳感觉运动mu节律期波动。
背景:经颅磁刺激(TMS)应用于初级运动皮层(M1),目标是感觉运动mu节律低谷期,通过运动诱发电位(MEP)的振幅测量,皮质脊髓兴奋性比峰值期高。然而,这种相位依赖效应因研究和个体而异。目的:探讨多相效应的稳定性。我们研究了与高皮质脊髓兴奋性相关的最佳mu相的潜在发作间和发作内波动。方法:对60名受试者进行脑状态独立的800次单次经颅磁刺激。为了进行分析,根据相位效应的显著性和不显著性将参与者分为两组。我们使用熵和一种新的相- mep稳定性度量来评估最优相的稳定性。我们使用线性混合效应模型评估了从mu相位、mu功率及其相互作用预测MEP振幅的效果。结果:我们的研究结果表明,仅对于显著相位效应组,波谷附近的相位引起的MEPs明显大于峰值。两组的最佳相位各不相同,但在具有显著相位效应的参与者中,主要保持在波谷附近。两组的Mu-power均与MEP振幅呈正相关。在第二个实验中,10名参与者完成了两个阶段,并且显示出低的测试-重测信度。结论:我们的研究结果证实了多相和多功率调节皮质脊髓兴奋性。个别的会话间变化和会话内波动限制了固定阶段目标的普遍性。未来的闭环TMS协议可能受益于实时自适应算法,以优化增产效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Brain Stimulation
Brain Stimulation 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
13.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
256
审稿时长
72 days
期刊介绍: Brain Stimulation publishes on the entire field of brain stimulation, including noninvasive and invasive techniques and technologies that alter brain function through the use of electrical, magnetic, radiowave, or focally targeted pharmacologic stimulation. Brain Stimulation aims to be the premier journal for publication of original research in the field of neuromodulation. The journal includes: a) Original articles; b) Short Communications; c) Invited and original reviews; d) Technology and methodological perspectives (reviews of new devices, description of new methods, etc.); and e) Letters to the Editor. Special issues of the journal will be considered based on scientific merit.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信