Yixin Wang, Yongkang Zhang, Lin Lin, Zongtao Hu, Hongzhi Wang
{"title":"Dosiomic and radiomic features within radiotherapy target volume for predicting the treatment response in patients with glioma after radiotherapy.","authors":"Yixin Wang, Yongkang Zhang, Lin Lin, Zongtao Hu, Hongzhi Wang","doi":"10.1186/s12880-025-01955-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to develop interpretable machine learning models using radiomic and dosiomic features from radiotherapy target volumes to predict treatment response in glioma patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on 176 glioma patients. Treatment response was categorized into disease control rate (DCR) and non-DCR groups (training cohort: 71 vs. 44; validation cohort: 34 vs. 27). Five regions of interest (ROIs) were identified: gross tumor volume (GTV), gross tumor volume with tumor bed (GTVtb), clinical target volume (CTV), GTV-GTV and CTV-GTVtb. For each ROI, radiomic features and dosiomic features were separately extracted from CT images and dose maps. Feature selection was performed. Six dosimetric parameters and six clinical variables were also included in model development. Five predictive models were constructed using four machine learning algorithms: Radiomic, Dosiomic, Dose-Volume Histogram (DVH), Combined (integrating clinical, radiomic, dosiomic, and DVH features), and Clinical models. Model performance was evaluated using accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and area under the curve (AUC). SHAP analysis was applied to explain model predictions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The CTV_combined support vector machine (SVM) model achieved the best performance, with an AUC of 0.728 in the validation cohort. SHAP summary plots showed that dosiomic features contributed significantly to prediction. Force plots further illustrated how individual features affected classification outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The SHAP-interpretable CTV_combined SVM model demonstrated strong predictive ability for treatment response in glioma patients. This approach may support radiation oncologists in identifying the underlying pathological mechanisms of poor treatment response and adjusting dose distribution accordingly, thereby aiding the development of personalized radiotherapy strategies.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial number: </strong>Not applicable.</p>","PeriodicalId":9020,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Imaging","volume":"25 1","pages":"402"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12492734/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-025-01955-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: This study aimed to develop interpretable machine learning models using radiomic and dosiomic features from radiotherapy target volumes to predict treatment response in glioma patients.
Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 176 glioma patients. Treatment response was categorized into disease control rate (DCR) and non-DCR groups (training cohort: 71 vs. 44; validation cohort: 34 vs. 27). Five regions of interest (ROIs) were identified: gross tumor volume (GTV), gross tumor volume with tumor bed (GTVtb), clinical target volume (CTV), GTV-GTV and CTV-GTVtb. For each ROI, radiomic features and dosiomic features were separately extracted from CT images and dose maps. Feature selection was performed. Six dosimetric parameters and six clinical variables were also included in model development. Five predictive models were constructed using four machine learning algorithms: Radiomic, Dosiomic, Dose-Volume Histogram (DVH), Combined (integrating clinical, radiomic, dosiomic, and DVH features), and Clinical models. Model performance was evaluated using accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and area under the curve (AUC). SHAP analysis was applied to explain model predictions.
Results: The CTV_combined support vector machine (SVM) model achieved the best performance, with an AUC of 0.728 in the validation cohort. SHAP summary plots showed that dosiomic features contributed significantly to prediction. Force plots further illustrated how individual features affected classification outcomes.
Conclusion: The SHAP-interpretable CTV_combined SVM model demonstrated strong predictive ability for treatment response in glioma patients. This approach may support radiation oncologists in identifying the underlying pathological mechanisms of poor treatment response and adjusting dose distribution accordingly, thereby aiding the development of personalized radiotherapy strategies.
背景:本研究旨在开发可解释的机器学习模型,利用放疗靶体积的放射学和剂量学特征来预测胶质瘤患者的治疗反应。方法:对176例胶质瘤患者进行回顾性分析。治疗反应分为疾病控制率组(DCR)和非DCR组(训练组:71 vs. 44;验证组:34 vs. 27)。确定了5个感兴趣区域(roi):总肿瘤体积(GTV)、肿瘤床总肿瘤体积(GTVtb)、临床靶体积(CTV)、GTV-GTV和CTV-GTVtb。对于每个ROI,分别从CT图像和剂量图中提取放射学特征和剂量学特征。进行特征选择。6个剂量学参数和6个临床变量也包括在模型开发中。使用四种机器学习算法构建了五个预测模型:Radiomic、剂量组、剂量-体积直方图(DVH)、Combined(整合临床、放射组、剂量组和DVH特征)和临床模型。使用准确度、精密度、召回率、f1评分和曲线下面积(AUC)来评估模型的性能。应用SHAP分析解释模型预测。结果:CTV_combined support vector machine (SVM)模型在验证队列中表现最佳,AUC为0.728。SHAP总结图显示,剂量学特征对预测有显著贡献。力图进一步说明了个体特征如何影响分类结果。结论:shap -可解释ctv_联合SVM模型对胶质瘤患者的治疗反应具有较强的预测能力。这种方法可以帮助放射肿瘤学家识别治疗反应不良的潜在病理机制,并相应地调整剂量分布,从而有助于个性化放疗策略的发展。临床试验号:不适用。
期刊介绍:
BMC Medical Imaging is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in the development, evaluation, and use of imaging techniques and image processing tools to diagnose and manage disease.