Sarah C Kramer, Laura Andrea Barrero Guevara, Matthias An der Heiden, Benjamin Wachtler, Matthieu Domenech de Cellès
{"title":"Changing socioeconomic inequalities in the incidence and case fatality rates of COVID-19 in Germany, March 2020 through May 2022: an ecological study.","authors":"Sarah C Kramer, Laura Andrea Barrero Guevara, Matthias An der Heiden, Benjamin Wachtler, Matthieu Domenech de Cellès","doi":"10.1186/s12889-025-24625-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Socioeconomic disparities in COVID-19 burden were widely observed during the pandemic's early waves, including in Germany, but studies on whether these inequalities have persisted or changed as the pandemic progressed are lacking.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used an ecological study design to assess the relationship between a range of demographic, socioeconomic, and healthcare-related predictors and COVID-19 impact in Germany. Specifically, we fit generalized additive models to cumulative, district-level (n = 400) COVID-19 incidence and case fatality rates (CFRs) for each of the first five pandemic waves, which covered the period from March 2020 through May 2022.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We find that associations between socioeconomic deprivation and COVID-19 impact evolved over time. Specifically, districts with higher levels of deprivation experienced lower incidence initially, but higher incidence beginning in the second half of wave 1 and persisting through wave 3. Meanwhile, more deprived districts experienced higher CFRs initially as well as during waves 3 through 5, but lower CFRs during the second half of wave 1. Finally, during the first four waves, we find that district-level CFRs scaled superlinearly with incidence, suggesting that the risk of death increased with incidence. This relationship was particularly strong during the first pandemic wave.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The association between socioeconomic position and COVID-19 impact in Germany has been complex, with patterns changing in intensity and direction over time. Continued monitoring of socioeconomic inequalities in COVID-19 impact, in particular at the individual level, is needed to better understand if and how inequalities continue to persist. Such monitoring will be instrumental in informing more equitable control strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":9039,"journal":{"name":"BMC Public Health","volume":"25 1","pages":"3289"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-025-24625-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Socioeconomic disparities in COVID-19 burden were widely observed during the pandemic's early waves, including in Germany, but studies on whether these inequalities have persisted or changed as the pandemic progressed are lacking.
Methods: We used an ecological study design to assess the relationship between a range of demographic, socioeconomic, and healthcare-related predictors and COVID-19 impact in Germany. Specifically, we fit generalized additive models to cumulative, district-level (n = 400) COVID-19 incidence and case fatality rates (CFRs) for each of the first five pandemic waves, which covered the period from March 2020 through May 2022.
Results: We find that associations between socioeconomic deprivation and COVID-19 impact evolved over time. Specifically, districts with higher levels of deprivation experienced lower incidence initially, but higher incidence beginning in the second half of wave 1 and persisting through wave 3. Meanwhile, more deprived districts experienced higher CFRs initially as well as during waves 3 through 5, but lower CFRs during the second half of wave 1. Finally, during the first four waves, we find that district-level CFRs scaled superlinearly with incidence, suggesting that the risk of death increased with incidence. This relationship was particularly strong during the first pandemic wave.
Conclusions: The association between socioeconomic position and COVID-19 impact in Germany has been complex, with patterns changing in intensity and direction over time. Continued monitoring of socioeconomic inequalities in COVID-19 impact, in particular at the individual level, is needed to better understand if and how inequalities continue to persist. Such monitoring will be instrumental in informing more equitable control strategies.
期刊介绍:
BMC Public Health is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on the epidemiology of disease and the understanding of all aspects of public health. The journal has a special focus on the social determinants of health, the environmental, behavioral, and occupational correlates of health and disease, and the impact of health policies, practices and interventions on the community.