Life Cycle Assessment of biomass resources for hydrogen production.

IF 8 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Hsien H Khoo, Eugene H Z Ho, Ken S Yap, Yang Zhao, Daren Z L Tan, Z Yeo
{"title":"Life Cycle Assessment of biomass resources for hydrogen production.","authors":"Hsien H Khoo, Eugene H Z Ho, Ken S Yap, Yang Zhao, Daren Z L Tan, Z Yeo","doi":"10.1016/j.scitotenv.2025.180587","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Energy demands are steadily increasing due to rising economy and industrial developments. There is a need to replace non-renewable fossil fuels with bio-based hydrogen. This article investigates various bio‑hydrogen production processes from 5 biomass resources: i) rice straw, ii) switchgrass, iii) sugarcane bagasse, iv) wheat straw, and v) corn stalk. Case studies of 12 bio‑hydrogen pathways were evaluated via LCA approach. The LCA impacts consist of Global Warming Potential (GWP), Acidification Potential (AP), Eutrophication Potential (EP), and Photochemical Ozone Creation Potential (POCP). The results demonstrated rice straw (RS) was the least favorable option utilized to produce 1 kg H<sub>2</sub> among all 12 options. Further comparisons were made concerning Energy demands, Water Footprint and Land Footprint. Normalization and Weighted scoring procedure were carried out. Among all 12 cases, the most favorable Normalized and Weighted impact scores were demonstrated by two cases (Impact scores of -7.61 and - 5.07) involving the gasification of switchgrass to produce hydrogen. A wide range of both carbon and water footprint results were displayed with the application of various bioprocesses for hydrogen generation. The wide range of results is due to the sets of varying environmental indicators applied for land and water use in LCA research areas. To further enhance the results, error analysis was also done for both energy requirements and water footprints.</p>","PeriodicalId":422,"journal":{"name":"Science of the Total Environment","volume":"1002 ","pages":"180587"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science of the Total Environment","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2025.180587","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Energy demands are steadily increasing due to rising economy and industrial developments. There is a need to replace non-renewable fossil fuels with bio-based hydrogen. This article investigates various bio‑hydrogen production processes from 5 biomass resources: i) rice straw, ii) switchgrass, iii) sugarcane bagasse, iv) wheat straw, and v) corn stalk. Case studies of 12 bio‑hydrogen pathways were evaluated via LCA approach. The LCA impacts consist of Global Warming Potential (GWP), Acidification Potential (AP), Eutrophication Potential (EP), and Photochemical Ozone Creation Potential (POCP). The results demonstrated rice straw (RS) was the least favorable option utilized to produce 1 kg H2 among all 12 options. Further comparisons were made concerning Energy demands, Water Footprint and Land Footprint. Normalization and Weighted scoring procedure were carried out. Among all 12 cases, the most favorable Normalized and Weighted impact scores were demonstrated by two cases (Impact scores of -7.61 and - 5.07) involving the gasification of switchgrass to produce hydrogen. A wide range of both carbon and water footprint results were displayed with the application of various bioprocesses for hydrogen generation. The wide range of results is due to the sets of varying environmental indicators applied for land and water use in LCA research areas. To further enhance the results, error analysis was also done for both energy requirements and water footprints.

生物质制氢资源的生命周期评价。
由于经济和工业的发展,能源需求正在稳步增长。有必要用生物基氢取代不可再生的化石燃料。本文研究了5种生物质资源的各种生物制氢工艺:i)稻草,ii)柳枝稷,iii)甘蔗甘蔗渣,iv)小麦秸秆和v)玉米秸秆。通过LCA方法评估了12种生物氢途径的案例研究。LCA影响包括全球变暖潜势(GWP)、酸化潜势(AP)、富营养化潜势(EP)和光化学臭氧生成潜势(POCP)。结果表明,在12种选择中,秸秆是产生1 kg H2的最不利选择。进一步比较了能源需求、水足迹和土地足迹。进行归一化和加权评分程序。在所有12个案例中,标准化和加权影响得分最高的两个案例(影响得分为-7.61和- 5.07)涉及柳枝稷气化制氢。随着各种生物制氢工艺的应用,广泛的碳和水足迹结果被展示出来。结果的广泛差异是由于LCA研究区域的土地和水利用采用了不同的环境指标。为了进一步提高结果的准确性,我们还对能源需求和水足迹进行了误差分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Science of the Total Environment
Science of the Total Environment 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
17.60
自引率
10.20%
发文量
8726
审稿时长
2.4 months
期刊介绍: The Science of the Total Environment is an international journal dedicated to scientific research on the environment and its interaction with humanity. It covers a wide range of disciplines and seeks to publish innovative, hypothesis-driven, and impactful research that explores the entire environment, including the atmosphere, lithosphere, hydrosphere, biosphere, and anthroposphere. The journal's updated Aims & Scope emphasizes the importance of interdisciplinary environmental research with broad impact. Priority is given to studies that advance fundamental understanding and explore the interconnectedness of multiple environmental spheres. Field studies are preferred, while laboratory experiments must demonstrate significant methodological advancements or mechanistic insights with direct relevance to the environment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信