The burden of insurance requirements on timely access to biologic therapy for patients with autoimmune blistering diseases: a survey of immunobullous experts in the United States
Paige E. Adams, Elise K. Brunsgaard, Nikki Rezania, Rebecca A. Strong, Marc Yale, Kyle T. Amber
{"title":"The burden of insurance requirements on timely access to biologic therapy for patients with autoimmune blistering diseases: a survey of immunobullous experts in the United States","authors":"Paige E. Adams, Elise K. Brunsgaard, Nikki Rezania, Rebecca A. Strong, Marc Yale, Kyle T. Amber","doi":"10.1007/s00403-025-04376-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The advancement of biologic therapies has improved outcomes for patients with autoimmune blistering diseases (AIBDs). Despite medical advancements, lack of insurance coverage limits access to these medications. In this observational study, we aimed to describe the burden of prior authorizations (PAs) and insurance delays for biologic therapy in AIBD patients from the physician perspective. Surveys were completed by AIBD experts (<i>n</i> = 18) across the United States, amounting to a response rate of 60%. AIBD experts reported an average 3.1 week wait time for insurance approval of rituximab, with over half reporting that insurance required a change in dosing protocol. Though experts identified a benefit of dupilumab and omalizumab in bullous pemphigoid, expectant insurance denial limited the use of these therapies. Experts spent an average of 1.4 h per week on insurance-related matters for AIBD patients, and half hired additional staff in the last 3 years due to PAs for biologic therapy in AIBD patients. These findings highlight the substantial burden of insurance coverage on the utility of biologic therapy in AIBD and underscore the significant work contributions required by physicians and staff for insurance-related processes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8203,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Dermatological Research","volume":"317 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Dermatological Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00403-025-04376-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The advancement of biologic therapies has improved outcomes for patients with autoimmune blistering diseases (AIBDs). Despite medical advancements, lack of insurance coverage limits access to these medications. In this observational study, we aimed to describe the burden of prior authorizations (PAs) and insurance delays for biologic therapy in AIBD patients from the physician perspective. Surveys were completed by AIBD experts (n = 18) across the United States, amounting to a response rate of 60%. AIBD experts reported an average 3.1 week wait time for insurance approval of rituximab, with over half reporting that insurance required a change in dosing protocol. Though experts identified a benefit of dupilumab and omalizumab in bullous pemphigoid, expectant insurance denial limited the use of these therapies. Experts spent an average of 1.4 h per week on insurance-related matters for AIBD patients, and half hired additional staff in the last 3 years due to PAs for biologic therapy in AIBD patients. These findings highlight the substantial burden of insurance coverage on the utility of biologic therapy in AIBD and underscore the significant work contributions required by physicians and staff for insurance-related processes.
期刊介绍:
Archives of Dermatological Research is a highly rated international journal that publishes original contributions in the field of experimental dermatology, including papers on biochemistry, morphology and immunology of the skin. The journal is among the few not related to dermatological associations or belonging to respective societies which guarantees complete independence. This English-language journal also offers a platform for review articles in areas of interest for dermatologists and for publication of innovative clinical trials.