Jay Patel, Olivia McGeough, Jaclyn Rosenthal Himeles, Jesse M. Lewin
{"title":"Surgical practices among Mohs surgeons for medically complex and high-risk patients: a survey of American College of Mohs surgery members","authors":"Jay Patel, Olivia McGeough, Jaclyn Rosenthal Himeles, Jesse M. Lewin","doi":"10.1007/s00403-025-04404-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) offers high cure rates and low complication risk for skin cancer. No formal guidelines exist for preoperative clearance or perioperative management of medically complex patients. We aimed to assess current practice patterns of Mohs micrographic surgeons with membership in the American College of Mohs Surgeons (ACMS) to identify practice gaps and inform future directions for expanding best practice guidelines in MMS. A 30-question survey was distributed to American College of Mohs Surgery (ACMS) members to evaluate preoperative clearance and perioperative management of high-risk patients. Descriptive statistics and chi-squared analyses were performed. Sixty-eight surgeons responded (52% single-specialty, 20% academic, 48% suburban, 40% urban). Practice characteristics did not affect responses. Although 43% responded that they do obtain preoperative clearance, 77% of those only obtain clearance 1–5 times per year, demonstrating the infrequent use of preoperative clearance in general. When utilized, preoperative clearance was most often for severe cardiovascular disease (50%), bleeding disorders (47%), or surgical complexity (40%). Primary care (71%) and cardiology (68%) were the main consultants. For patients with implantable cardiac devices, 47% used monopolar hyfrecators over bipolar forceps (32%) and electrocautery (21%). Cardiovascular disease did not affect lidocaine with epinephrine use (90%), and 54% used plain lidocaine in pregnancy, regardless of trimester. Anxiolytics were prescribed by 67% at least a few times per year, with 63% not monitoring perioperative vital signs after giving anxiolytics. Most surgeons avoided prophylactic antibiotics in solid organ transplant recipients (13% preoperative, 34% postoperative). HIV and hepatitis C testing and viral load monitoring were rarely performed. Bloodborne pathogen precautions included verbal (77%) or written (64%) communication and double gloves (40%). This survey identifies key comorbidities and approaches to management of medically complex patients, revealing variability in practice patterns among the cohort surveyed. Few sought clearances overall, reflecting the low complication rates and overall safety of MMS. Despite this, substantial heterogeneity exists for preoperative clearance and perioperative management. The findings highlight the need for further evaluation of practices and outcomes among Mohs surgeons, along with formal guidelines to standardize care in medically complex patients.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8203,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Dermatological Research","volume":"317 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Dermatological Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00403-025-04404-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) offers high cure rates and low complication risk for skin cancer. No formal guidelines exist for preoperative clearance or perioperative management of medically complex patients. We aimed to assess current practice patterns of Mohs micrographic surgeons with membership in the American College of Mohs Surgeons (ACMS) to identify practice gaps and inform future directions for expanding best practice guidelines in MMS. A 30-question survey was distributed to American College of Mohs Surgery (ACMS) members to evaluate preoperative clearance and perioperative management of high-risk patients. Descriptive statistics and chi-squared analyses were performed. Sixty-eight surgeons responded (52% single-specialty, 20% academic, 48% suburban, 40% urban). Practice characteristics did not affect responses. Although 43% responded that they do obtain preoperative clearance, 77% of those only obtain clearance 1–5 times per year, demonstrating the infrequent use of preoperative clearance in general. When utilized, preoperative clearance was most often for severe cardiovascular disease (50%), bleeding disorders (47%), or surgical complexity (40%). Primary care (71%) and cardiology (68%) were the main consultants. For patients with implantable cardiac devices, 47% used monopolar hyfrecators over bipolar forceps (32%) and electrocautery (21%). Cardiovascular disease did not affect lidocaine with epinephrine use (90%), and 54% used plain lidocaine in pregnancy, regardless of trimester. Anxiolytics were prescribed by 67% at least a few times per year, with 63% not monitoring perioperative vital signs after giving anxiolytics. Most surgeons avoided prophylactic antibiotics in solid organ transplant recipients (13% preoperative, 34% postoperative). HIV and hepatitis C testing and viral load monitoring were rarely performed. Bloodborne pathogen precautions included verbal (77%) or written (64%) communication and double gloves (40%). This survey identifies key comorbidities and approaches to management of medically complex patients, revealing variability in practice patterns among the cohort surveyed. Few sought clearances overall, reflecting the low complication rates and overall safety of MMS. Despite this, substantial heterogeneity exists for preoperative clearance and perioperative management. The findings highlight the need for further evaluation of practices and outcomes among Mohs surgeons, along with formal guidelines to standardize care in medically complex patients.
莫氏显微摄影手术(MMS)提供了高治愈率和低并发症风险的皮肤癌。对于医学复杂患者的术前清除或围手术期管理尚无正式的指南。我们的目的是评估具有美国莫氏外科医师学会(ACMS)会员资格的莫氏显微摄影外科医生目前的实践模式,以确定实践差距,并为扩大MMS最佳实践指南的未来方向提供信息。向美国莫氏外科学会(American College of Mohs Surgery, ACMS)会员发放了一份30个问题的调查问卷,以评估高危患者的术前清除和围手术期管理。进行描述性统计和卡方分析。68名外科医生做出了回应(52%为单一专科,20%为专科,48%为郊区,40%为城市)。实践特征不影响反应。虽然43%的人回答说他们确实获得了术前清除,但其中77%的人每年只获得1-5次清除,这表明术前清除的使用总体上并不频繁。术前清除率最常用于严重心血管疾病(50%)、出血性疾病(47%)或手术复杂性(40%)。初级保健(71%)和心脏病学(68%)是主要咨询师。对于植入心脏装置的患者,47%使用单极充氢器,而不是双极钳(32%)和电灼(21%)。心血管疾病对使用肾上腺素的利多卡因没有影响(90%),54%的人在妊娠期间使用普通利多卡因,无论孕期如何。67%的患者每年至少开几次抗焦虑药,63%的患者在服用抗焦虑药后没有监测围手术期生命体征。大多数外科医生避免对实体器官移植受者使用预防性抗生素(术前13%,术后34%)。很少进行艾滋病毒和丙型肝炎检测和病毒载量监测。血源性病原体预防措施包括口头(77%)或书面(64%)交流和双手套(40%)。这项调查确定了关键的合并症和治疗复杂患者的方法,揭示了在接受调查的队列中实践模式的差异。总体而言,很少寻求清除,反映了MMS的低并发症发生率和总体安全性。尽管如此,术前清除和围手术期管理存在很大的异质性。研究结果强调需要进一步评估莫氏外科医生的实践和结果,以及制定正式的指导方针,以规范医疗复杂患者的护理。
期刊介绍:
Archives of Dermatological Research is a highly rated international journal that publishes original contributions in the field of experimental dermatology, including papers on biochemistry, morphology and immunology of the skin. The journal is among the few not related to dermatological associations or belonging to respective societies which guarantees complete independence. This English-language journal also offers a platform for review articles in areas of interest for dermatologists and for publication of innovative clinical trials.