Innovative Strategy for Nitrate Removal from Groundwater: Synergistic Interactions of Autotrophic Microalgae and Heterotrophic Denitrifiers in Sequential Batch Process
{"title":"Innovative Strategy for Nitrate Removal from Groundwater: Synergistic Interactions of Autotrophic Microalgae and Heterotrophic Denitrifiers in Sequential Batch Process","authors":"Fariba Rezvani, Mohammad-Hossein Sarrafzadeh","doi":"10.1007/s11270-025-08516-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Groundwater nitrate pollution threatens health and environment. Traditional biological methods face struggle with carbon shortages and byproducts. We developed a process where microalgae provide organic carbon as COD through CO₂ fixation, efficiently supporting heterotrophic denitrifiers (HTDs). This study evaluated batch interactions of microalgal-bacterial consortia at different mass ratios to determine the optimal combination for maximizing nitrate-nitrogen removal rates (NRR) and minimizing hydraulic retention times (HRT) to reduce NO₃⁻-N to 10 mg/L, suitable for sequential batch photobioreactor applications. Individually, <i>Chlorella vulgaris</i> and <i>Scenedesmus</i> sp. removed 50 mg NO₃⁻-N/L at rates of 10 and 12.7 mg/L/d over 96 and 76 h, respectively. A mixed microalgal culture improved performance, reducing HRT to 73 h and achieving a peak NRR of 13.2 mg/L/d, but generated 85 mg/L of COD. HTDs alone achieved a maximum NRR of 56 mg/L/day within 18 h but generated nearly 1 mg/L of nitrite and ammonia byproducts. Combining microalgae with HTDs at 1:1 and 2:1 mass ratios enhanced NRRs to 15.2 and 20 mg/L/d, respectively, with reduced HRTs of 63 and 48 h, while minimizing byproduct formation. The 1:2 ratio showed decreased NRR (11.4 mg/L/d) and longer HRT (84 h), likely due to reduced organic carbon availability as COD. Higher HTD proportions also improved biomass settling efficiency (up to 0.62). A 21-day sequential batch photobioreactor study showed that reducing HRT from 3 to 2 days promoted microbial adaptation and nitrate removal, with the 1:1 ratio achieving faster nitrate reduction than 2:1, making it applicable for large-scale application.</p><p>Reducing hydraulic retention from 3 to 2 days sped up nitrate removal in the sequential batch process.</p>","PeriodicalId":808,"journal":{"name":"Water, Air, & Soil Pollution","volume":"236 13","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water, Air, & Soil Pollution","FirstCategoryId":"6","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11270-025-08516-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Groundwater nitrate pollution threatens health and environment. Traditional biological methods face struggle with carbon shortages and byproducts. We developed a process where microalgae provide organic carbon as COD through CO₂ fixation, efficiently supporting heterotrophic denitrifiers (HTDs). This study evaluated batch interactions of microalgal-bacterial consortia at different mass ratios to determine the optimal combination for maximizing nitrate-nitrogen removal rates (NRR) and minimizing hydraulic retention times (HRT) to reduce NO₃⁻-N to 10 mg/L, suitable for sequential batch photobioreactor applications. Individually, Chlorella vulgaris and Scenedesmus sp. removed 50 mg NO₃⁻-N/L at rates of 10 and 12.7 mg/L/d over 96 and 76 h, respectively. A mixed microalgal culture improved performance, reducing HRT to 73 h and achieving a peak NRR of 13.2 mg/L/d, but generated 85 mg/L of COD. HTDs alone achieved a maximum NRR of 56 mg/L/day within 18 h but generated nearly 1 mg/L of nitrite and ammonia byproducts. Combining microalgae with HTDs at 1:1 and 2:1 mass ratios enhanced NRRs to 15.2 and 20 mg/L/d, respectively, with reduced HRTs of 63 and 48 h, while minimizing byproduct formation. The 1:2 ratio showed decreased NRR (11.4 mg/L/d) and longer HRT (84 h), likely due to reduced organic carbon availability as COD. Higher HTD proportions also improved biomass settling efficiency (up to 0.62). A 21-day sequential batch photobioreactor study showed that reducing HRT from 3 to 2 days promoted microbial adaptation and nitrate removal, with the 1:1 ratio achieving faster nitrate reduction than 2:1, making it applicable for large-scale application.
Reducing hydraulic retention from 3 to 2 days sped up nitrate removal in the sequential batch process.
期刊介绍:
Water, Air, & Soil Pollution is an international, interdisciplinary journal on all aspects of pollution and solutions to pollution in the biosphere. This includes chemical, physical and biological processes affecting flora, fauna, water, air and soil in relation to environmental pollution. Because of its scope, the subject areas are diverse and include all aspects of pollution sources, transport, deposition, accumulation, acid precipitation, atmospheric pollution, metals, aquatic pollution including marine pollution and ground water, waste water, pesticides, soil pollution, sewage, sediment pollution, forestry pollution, effects of pollutants on humans, vegetation, fish, aquatic species, micro-organisms, and animals, environmental and molecular toxicology applied to pollution research, biosensors, global and climate change, ecological implications of pollution and pollution models. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution also publishes manuscripts on novel methods used in the study of environmental pollutants, environmental toxicology, environmental biology, novel environmental engineering related to pollution, biodiversity as influenced by pollution, novel environmental biotechnology as applied to pollution (e.g. bioremediation), environmental modelling and biorestoration of polluted environments.
Articles should not be submitted that are of local interest only and do not advance international knowledge in environmental pollution and solutions to pollution. Articles that simply replicate known knowledge or techniques while researching a local pollution problem will normally be rejected without review. Submitted articles must have up-to-date references, employ the correct experimental replication and statistical analysis, where needed and contain a significant contribution to new knowledge. The publishing and editorial team sincerely appreciate your cooperation.
Water, Air, & Soil Pollution publishes research papers; review articles; mini-reviews; and book reviews.