Hand Signs Recognition by Deep Muscle Impedimetric Measurements

IF 1.5
Tareq Almustafa;Bilel Ben Atitallah;Khaldon Lweesy;Mohammed Ibbini;Olfa Kanoun
{"title":"Hand Signs Recognition by Deep Muscle Impedimetric Measurements","authors":"Tareq Almustafa;Bilel Ben Atitallah;Khaldon Lweesy;Mohammed Ibbini;Olfa Kanoun","doi":"10.1109/OJIM.2025.3605224","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study investigates the potential of impedimetric measurements providing deep muscle information for recognizing 36 American Sign Language (ASL) hand signs. Two measurement methods are considered together for the first time: electrical impedance myography (EIM) and electrical impedance tomography (EIT). EIM was measured along the anterior forearm, while 8-electrode EIT was recorded around the forearm below the elbow. Data were acquired from three volunteers, with each hand sign performed ten times. A correlation analysis was conducted to identify the relevant EIM frequencies to distinguish between hand signs. Among all evaluated algorithms, the random forest classifier achieves the highest classification performance. Classification based on the resistance and reactance at the selected EIM frequencies achieved <inline-formula> <tex-math>$61.54~{\\pm }~0.85$ </tex-math></inline-formula>%, while classification based on EIT boundary voltages achieved 91.04% <inline-formula> <tex-math>${\\pm }~0.46$ </tex-math></inline-formula>%. Combining the results from both classifiers into an EIM-EIT hybrid classifier improved the accuracy to <inline-formula> <tex-math>$92.57~{\\pm }~0.41$ </tex-math></inline-formula>%, effectively reducing ambiguities between similar hand signs. Achieved results considerably outperform state-of-the-art works, which typically classify fewer hand signs or achieve lower accuracy.","PeriodicalId":100630,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Open Journal of Instrumentation and Measurement","volume":"4 ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=11152398","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Open Journal of Instrumentation and Measurement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11152398/","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigates the potential of impedimetric measurements providing deep muscle information for recognizing 36 American Sign Language (ASL) hand signs. Two measurement methods are considered together for the first time: electrical impedance myography (EIM) and electrical impedance tomography (EIT). EIM was measured along the anterior forearm, while 8-electrode EIT was recorded around the forearm below the elbow. Data were acquired from three volunteers, with each hand sign performed ten times. A correlation analysis was conducted to identify the relevant EIM frequencies to distinguish between hand signs. Among all evaluated algorithms, the random forest classifier achieves the highest classification performance. Classification based on the resistance and reactance at the selected EIM frequencies achieved $61.54~{\pm }~0.85$ %, while classification based on EIT boundary voltages achieved 91.04% ${\pm }~0.46$ %. Combining the results from both classifiers into an EIM-EIT hybrid classifier improved the accuracy to $92.57~{\pm }~0.41$ %, effectively reducing ambiguities between similar hand signs. Achieved results considerably outperform state-of-the-art works, which typically classify fewer hand signs or achieve lower accuracy.
深层肌肉障碍测量的手势识别
本研究探讨了障碍测量为识别36种美国手语(ASL)手势提供深层肌肉信息的潜力。本文首次提出了电阻抗肌图(EIM)和电阻抗断层扫描(EIT)两种测量方法。沿前臂前侧测量EIT,沿肘部以下前臂周围记录8电极EIT。数据来自三名志愿者,每个手势重复10次。进行相关分析,识别相关的EIM频率,以区分手势。在所有被评估的算法中,随机森林分类器的分类性能最高。基于所选EIM频率下电阻和电抗的分类率为61.54~{\pm}~0.85$ %,而基于EIT边界电压的分类率为91.04% ~0.46$ %。将两个分类器的结果结合到EIM-EIT混合分类器中,准确率提高到$92.57~{\pm}~0.41$ %,有效地减少了相似手势之间的歧义。所取得的结果大大优于最先进的作品,后者通常分类较少的手势或达到较低的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信