Repurposing isoxazoline insecticides to control Varroa destructor populations in honey bee colonies.
IF 3.8
1区 农林科学
Q1 AGRONOMY
Julia St Amant,Sanghyeon Kim,Zhilin Li,Daniel R Swale,Cameron J Jack
求助PDF
{"title":"Repurposing isoxazoline insecticides to control Varroa destructor populations in honey bee colonies.","authors":"Julia St Amant,Sanghyeon Kim,Zhilin Li,Daniel R Swale,Cameron J Jack","doi":"10.1002/ps.70285","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nThe devastating honey bee (Apis mellifera) pest, Varroa destructor, has developed resistance to commonly used synthetic acaricides, such as amitraz, tau-fluvalinate, and coumaphos. To find new active ingredients that may be useful in reducing V. destructor populations in honey bee colonies, we examined the acute toxicity of isoxazoline insecticides that are toxic to ectoparasites, such as ticks and fleas.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nHere, we evaluated the toxicity of afoxolaner, fluralaner, sarolaner, and lotilaner to V. destructor and honey bees using direct application methods. Fluralaner (median lethal dose (LD50) = 0.07 ng/V. destructor) was the most toxic isoxazoline insecticide and only 2× less toxic than amitraz (0.04 ng/V. destructor), but 25,600× more toxic than coumaphos (1789 ng/V. destructor). Sarolaner (selectivity ratio = 0.3) was much more toxic to honey bees than to V. destructor, while afoxolaner toxicity was equal to mites and bees. Fluralaner and lotilaner were 123× and 2× more toxic to V. destructor than to honey bees. In addition to describing isoxazolines as a putative chemical class to control V. destructor, we tested the potency of fluralaner against the firing frequency of V. destructor central neurons. Exposure to 30 μm fluralaner led to reversal of GABA inhibition with a significant increase of nerve firing when compared to GABA firing rates.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSION\r\nThese data suggest that fluralaner represents a potential candidate for V. destructor control in colonies due to its high toxicity to V. destructor and its relatively low toxicity to honey bees. Additionally, methodological details for electrophysiological recordings on V. destructor central nervous system (CNS) firing rates can be used to advance the development of new miticides. © 2025 Society of Chemical Industry.","PeriodicalId":218,"journal":{"name":"Pest Management Science","volume":"98 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pest Management Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.70285","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
引用
批量引用
Abstract
BACKGROUND
The devastating honey bee (Apis mellifera) pest, Varroa destructor, has developed resistance to commonly used synthetic acaricides, such as amitraz, tau-fluvalinate, and coumaphos. To find new active ingredients that may be useful in reducing V. destructor populations in honey bee colonies, we examined the acute toxicity of isoxazoline insecticides that are toxic to ectoparasites, such as ticks and fleas.
RESULTS
Here, we evaluated the toxicity of afoxolaner, fluralaner, sarolaner, and lotilaner to V. destructor and honey bees using direct application methods. Fluralaner (median lethal dose (LD50) = 0.07 ng/V. destructor) was the most toxic isoxazoline insecticide and only 2× less toxic than amitraz (0.04 ng/V. destructor), but 25,600× more toxic than coumaphos (1789 ng/V. destructor). Sarolaner (selectivity ratio = 0.3) was much more toxic to honey bees than to V. destructor, while afoxolaner toxicity was equal to mites and bees. Fluralaner and lotilaner were 123× and 2× more toxic to V. destructor than to honey bees. In addition to describing isoxazolines as a putative chemical class to control V. destructor, we tested the potency of fluralaner against the firing frequency of V. destructor central neurons. Exposure to 30 μm fluralaner led to reversal of GABA inhibition with a significant increase of nerve firing when compared to GABA firing rates.
CONCLUSION
These data suggest that fluralaner represents a potential candidate for V. destructor control in colonies due to its high toxicity to V. destructor and its relatively low toxicity to honey bees. Additionally, methodological details for electrophysiological recordings on V. destructor central nervous system (CNS) firing rates can be used to advance the development of new miticides. © 2025 Society of Chemical Industry.
异恶唑啉类杀虫剂在控制蜜蜂种群中破坏性瓦螨种群中的应用。
背景毁灭性的蜜蜂害虫,破坏瓦螨,已经对常用的合成杀螨剂产生了抗药性,如阿米特兹、甲氟氰酸酯和康莫福。为了寻找新的有效成分,可能有助于减少蜜蜂种群的破坏性V.,我们检查了异恶唑啉杀虫剂的急性毒性,这些杀虫剂对体外寄生虫,如蜱和跳蚤有毒性。结果采用直接施药的方法,评价了阿伏虫胺、氟拉烷、沙络虫胺和洛替兰对大蠊和蜜蜂的毒性。氟拉内(中位致死剂量(LD50) = 0.07 ng/V)。异恶唑啉类杀虫剂毒性最大,仅比咪唑嗪(0.04 ng/V)低2倍。但毒性比康福(1789 ng/V)高25600倍。析构函数)。选择性比为0.3的阿伏唑啉对蜜蜂的毒性明显大于对灭螨的毒性,而对螨虫和蜜蜂的毒性相当。氟拉烷和洛替拉烷对蜜蜂的毒性分别为其毒性的123倍和2倍。除了将异恶唑啉描述为控制毁灭弧菌的假定化学类别外,我们还测试了氟拉烷对毁灭弧菌中枢神经元放电频率的效力。暴露于30 μm氟拉烷导致GABA抑制逆转,与GABA放电率相比,神经放电显著增加。结论氟拉烷对灭虫弧菌具有较高的毒力,对蜜蜂的毒力相对较低,是杀灭灭虫弧菌的潜在药剂。此外,对V. destructor中枢神经系统(CNS)放电速率的电生理记录的方法细节可用于推进新型杀螨剂的开发。©2025化学工业协会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。