Normative Data for Single- and Dual-Task Tandem Gait Performance in Collegiate Athletes.

IF 9.4 1区 医学 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES
Eric J Shumski,Landon B Lempke,David Howell,Thomas Buckley,Jessie Oldham,William Meehan,Robert C Lynall
{"title":"Normative Data for Single- and Dual-Task Tandem Gait Performance in Collegiate Athletes.","authors":"Eric J Shumski,Landon B Lempke,David Howell,Thomas Buckley,Jessie Oldham,William Meehan,Robert C Lynall","doi":"10.1007/s40279-025-02306-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nNormative dual-task (concurrent cognitive and motor task) tandem gait has not been developed. Currently, only individual baseline data are used for tandem gait assessment post concussion.\r\n\r\nOBJECTIVE\r\nThe object was to (1) determine factors associated with single-task and dual-task tandem gait time among collegiate athletes across multiple institutions, and (2) provide robust normative data for single-task and dual-task tandem gait time based on clinically relevant factors.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nData were analyzed from 2,137 unique collegiate athletes (19.0 ± 1.1 years, 48.9% female, 23.7% with concussion history) from 2015 to 2022 during pre-injury baseline concussion testing from three universities. Tandem gait was performed under single- and dual-task conditions (serial subtraction by sixes/sevens, spelling five-letter words backward, reciting the months backward). The criteria for being a clinically relevant independent variable was (a) p value < 0.05, and (b) effect estimate of ≥ 1 s. Normative data based on established percentile thresholds were derived and stratified by clinically relevant factors.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nNone of the single-task tandem gait times were clinically relevant, while sex and contact level were for dual task. Mean (95% confidence interval) for overall single- and dual-task tandem gait times were 12.07 s (11.95, 12.19) and 16.51 s (16.29, 16.73), respectively.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSION\r\nOur results provide robust normative data for single- and dual-task tandem gait stratified by relevant patient factors that can be immediately used by clinicians and future researchers. Future research should compare the use of individual baseline versus normative data for acute concussion tracking.","PeriodicalId":21969,"journal":{"name":"Sports Medicine","volume":"36 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-025-02306-2","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND Normative dual-task (concurrent cognitive and motor task) tandem gait has not been developed. Currently, only individual baseline data are used for tandem gait assessment post concussion. OBJECTIVE The object was to (1) determine factors associated with single-task and dual-task tandem gait time among collegiate athletes across multiple institutions, and (2) provide robust normative data for single-task and dual-task tandem gait time based on clinically relevant factors. METHODS Data were analyzed from 2,137 unique collegiate athletes (19.0 ± 1.1 years, 48.9% female, 23.7% with concussion history) from 2015 to 2022 during pre-injury baseline concussion testing from three universities. Tandem gait was performed under single- and dual-task conditions (serial subtraction by sixes/sevens, spelling five-letter words backward, reciting the months backward). The criteria for being a clinically relevant independent variable was (a) p value < 0.05, and (b) effect estimate of ≥ 1 s. Normative data based on established percentile thresholds were derived and stratified by clinically relevant factors. RESULTS None of the single-task tandem gait times were clinically relevant, while sex and contact level were for dual task. Mean (95% confidence interval) for overall single- and dual-task tandem gait times were 12.07 s (11.95, 12.19) and 16.51 s (16.29, 16.73), respectively. CONCLUSION Our results provide robust normative data for single- and dual-task tandem gait stratified by relevant patient factors that can be immediately used by clinicians and future researchers. Future research should compare the use of individual baseline versus normative data for acute concussion tracking.
大学运动员单任务和双任务串联步态表现的规范性数据。
标准的双任务(并发的认知和运动任务)串联步态尚未发展。目前,只有个体基线数据被用于脑震荡后的串联步态评估。目的:(1)确定多院校大学生运动员单任务和双任务串联步态时间的相关因素;(2)基于临床相关因素为单任务和双任务串联步态时间提供稳健的规范性数据。方法对三所高校2015 - 2022年2137名大学生运动员(年龄19.0±1.1岁,女性48.9%,有脑震荡病史23.7%)的伤前基线脑震荡测试数据进行分析。串联步态在单任务和双任务条件下进行(6 / 7连续减法,倒拼写五个字母的单词,倒背诵月份)。作为临床相关自变量的标准是(a) p值< 0.05,(b)效应估计≥1s。根据已建立的百分位阈值导出规范数据,并根据临床相关因素进行分层。结果单任务串联步态时间与临床无相关性,双任务步态时间与性别、接触水平有相关性。整体单任务和双任务串联步态时间的平均值(95%置信区间)分别为12.07 s(11.95, 12.19)和16.51 s(16.29, 16.73)。结论我们的研究结果为单任务和双任务串联步态的相关患者因素分层提供了可靠的规范数据,可以立即用于临床医生和未来的研究人员。未来的研究应该比较个体基线和规范数据在急性脑震荡追踪中的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sports Medicine
Sports Medicine 医学-运动科学
CiteScore
18.40
自引率
5.10%
发文量
165
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Sports Medicine focuses on providing definitive and comprehensive review articles that interpret and evaluate current literature, aiming to offer insights into research findings in the sports medicine and exercise field. The journal covers major topics such as sports medicine and sports science, medical syndromes associated with sport and exercise, clinical medicine's role in injury prevention and treatment, exercise for rehabilitation and health, and the application of physiological and biomechanical principles to specific sports. Types of Articles: Review Articles: Definitive and comprehensive reviews that interpret and evaluate current literature to provide rationale for and application of research findings. Leading/Current Opinion Articles: Overviews of contentious or emerging issues in the field. Original Research Articles: High-quality research articles. Enhanced Features: Additional features like slide sets, videos, and animations aimed at increasing the visibility, readership, and educational value of the journal's content. Plain Language Summaries: Summaries accompanying articles to assist readers in understanding important medical advances. Peer Review Process: All manuscripts undergo peer review by international experts to ensure quality and rigor. The journal also welcomes Letters to the Editor, which will be considered for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信