The prediction of round window visibility at posterior-tympanotomy for cochlear implantation with "black bone" magnetic resonance imaging : Author lists.
Hoi Ming Kwok, Cameron Spence, Emily Hocknell, Irumee Pai, Steve Connor
{"title":"The prediction of round window visibility at posterior-tympanotomy for cochlear implantation with \"black bone\" magnetic resonance imaging : Author lists.","authors":"Hoi Ming Kwok, Cameron Spence, Emily Hocknell, Irumee Pai, Steve Connor","doi":"10.1007/s00405-025-09718-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Although computed tomography (CT) can predict round window (RW) visibility at posterior tympanotomy pre-operatively, there is a trend towards the application of using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) alone for cochlear implant (CI) planning. This study assessed the potential of a novel \"Black Bone\" (BB) MRI sequence to determine RW visibility during posterior tympanotomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients underwent BB MRI as part of pre-operative CI planning. Two independent radiologists performed 5 landmark-based MRI measurements. RW visibility was recorded during posterior tympanotomy as > 50% or < 50% visibility. Patients with undefinable landmarks or absent surgical grading were excluded. Mann-Whitney U or t-tests compared MRI measurements to RW visibility whilst step wise logistic regression determined significant predictors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>86 patients (40 male; median 10.5 years) and 129 implanted ears (43 unilateral, 43 bilateral; 52 adult, 77 paediatric) were evaluated. There were 109/129 ears with > 50% and 20/129 ears with < 50% RW visibility. The external auditory canal (EAC) angle was increased in paediatric patients with > 50% RW visibility (P = 0.033; AUROC 0.689; 73.4% sensitive, 69.2% specific with threshold 6.2<sup>o</sup>) with ICC = 0.598. The facial recess distance, facial nerve location, and modified RW niche angle were increased in adult patients with > 50% RW visibility but only modified RW niche angle was significant on stepwise regression (P = 0.016; AUROC 0.805; 82.2% sensitive, 71.4% specific with threshold 17.95<sup>o</sup>) with ICC = 0.578.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The visibility of RW at posterior tympanotomy may be determined with pre-operative BB MRI. The optimal predictive measurements differ between adult and paediatric patients and there is superior performance in adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":520614,"journal":{"name":"European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-025-09718-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Although computed tomography (CT) can predict round window (RW) visibility at posterior tympanotomy pre-operatively, there is a trend towards the application of using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) alone for cochlear implant (CI) planning. This study assessed the potential of a novel "Black Bone" (BB) MRI sequence to determine RW visibility during posterior tympanotomy.
Methods: Patients underwent BB MRI as part of pre-operative CI planning. Two independent radiologists performed 5 landmark-based MRI measurements. RW visibility was recorded during posterior tympanotomy as > 50% or < 50% visibility. Patients with undefinable landmarks or absent surgical grading were excluded. Mann-Whitney U or t-tests compared MRI measurements to RW visibility whilst step wise logistic regression determined significant predictors.
Results: 86 patients (40 male; median 10.5 years) and 129 implanted ears (43 unilateral, 43 bilateral; 52 adult, 77 paediatric) were evaluated. There were 109/129 ears with > 50% and 20/129 ears with < 50% RW visibility. The external auditory canal (EAC) angle was increased in paediatric patients with > 50% RW visibility (P = 0.033; AUROC 0.689; 73.4% sensitive, 69.2% specific with threshold 6.2o) with ICC = 0.598. The facial recess distance, facial nerve location, and modified RW niche angle were increased in adult patients with > 50% RW visibility but only modified RW niche angle was significant on stepwise regression (P = 0.016; AUROC 0.805; 82.2% sensitive, 71.4% specific with threshold 17.95o) with ICC = 0.578.
Conclusion: The visibility of RW at posterior tympanotomy may be determined with pre-operative BB MRI. The optimal predictive measurements differ between adult and paediatric patients and there is superior performance in adults.