The prediction of round window visibility at posterior-tympanotomy for cochlear implantation with "black bone" magnetic resonance imaging : Author lists.

IF 2.2
Hoi Ming Kwok, Cameron Spence, Emily Hocknell, Irumee Pai, Steve Connor
{"title":"The prediction of round window visibility at posterior-tympanotomy for cochlear implantation with \"black bone\" magnetic resonance imaging : Author lists.","authors":"Hoi Ming Kwok, Cameron Spence, Emily Hocknell, Irumee Pai, Steve Connor","doi":"10.1007/s00405-025-09718-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Although computed tomography (CT) can predict round window (RW) visibility at posterior tympanotomy pre-operatively, there is a trend towards the application of using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) alone for cochlear implant (CI) planning. This study assessed the potential of a novel \"Black Bone\" (BB) MRI sequence to determine RW visibility during posterior tympanotomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients underwent BB MRI as part of pre-operative CI planning. Two independent radiologists performed 5 landmark-based MRI measurements. RW visibility was recorded during posterior tympanotomy as > 50% or < 50% visibility. Patients with undefinable landmarks or absent surgical grading were excluded. Mann-Whitney U or t-tests compared MRI measurements to RW visibility whilst step wise logistic regression determined significant predictors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>86 patients (40 male; median 10.5 years) and 129 implanted ears (43 unilateral, 43 bilateral; 52 adult, 77 paediatric) were evaluated. There were 109/129 ears with > 50% and 20/129 ears with < 50% RW visibility. The external auditory canal (EAC) angle was increased in paediatric patients with > 50% RW visibility (P = 0.033; AUROC 0.689; 73.4% sensitive, 69.2% specific with threshold 6.2<sup>o</sup>) with ICC = 0.598. The facial recess distance, facial nerve location, and modified RW niche angle were increased in adult patients with > 50% RW visibility but only modified RW niche angle was significant on stepwise regression (P = 0.016; AUROC 0.805; 82.2% sensitive, 71.4% specific with threshold 17.95<sup>o</sup>) with ICC = 0.578.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The visibility of RW at posterior tympanotomy may be determined with pre-operative BB MRI. The optimal predictive measurements differ between adult and paediatric patients and there is superior performance in adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":520614,"journal":{"name":"European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-025-09718-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Although computed tomography (CT) can predict round window (RW) visibility at posterior tympanotomy pre-operatively, there is a trend towards the application of using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) alone for cochlear implant (CI) planning. This study assessed the potential of a novel "Black Bone" (BB) MRI sequence to determine RW visibility during posterior tympanotomy.

Methods: Patients underwent BB MRI as part of pre-operative CI planning. Two independent radiologists performed 5 landmark-based MRI measurements. RW visibility was recorded during posterior tympanotomy as > 50% or < 50% visibility. Patients with undefinable landmarks or absent surgical grading were excluded. Mann-Whitney U or t-tests compared MRI measurements to RW visibility whilst step wise logistic regression determined significant predictors.

Results: 86 patients (40 male; median 10.5 years) and 129 implanted ears (43 unilateral, 43 bilateral; 52 adult, 77 paediatric) were evaluated. There were 109/129 ears with > 50% and 20/129 ears with < 50% RW visibility. The external auditory canal (EAC) angle was increased in paediatric patients with > 50% RW visibility (P = 0.033; AUROC 0.689; 73.4% sensitive, 69.2% specific with threshold 6.2o) with ICC = 0.598. The facial recess distance, facial nerve location, and modified RW niche angle were increased in adult patients with > 50% RW visibility but only modified RW niche angle was significant on stepwise regression (P = 0.016; AUROC 0.805; 82.2% sensitive, 71.4% specific with threshold 17.95o) with ICC = 0.578.

Conclusion: The visibility of RW at posterior tympanotomy may be determined with pre-operative BB MRI. The optimal predictive measurements differ between adult and paediatric patients and there is superior performance in adults.

用“黑骨”磁共振成像预测耳蜗植入后鼓室切开术的圆窗可见度:作者名单。
目的:虽然计算机断层扫描(CT)可以预测后鼓室切开术术前圆窗(RW)可见性,但磁共振成像(MRI)在人工耳蜗(CI)计划中的应用有趋势。本研究评估了一种新型“黑骨”(BB) MRI序列在确定后鼓室切开术中RW可见性方面的潜力。方法:患者行BB MRI作为术前CI计划的一部分。两名独立的放射科医生进行了5次地标性MRI测量。结果:对86例患者(40例男性,中位年龄10.5岁)和129例植入耳(43例单侧,43例双侧,52例成人,77例儿科)进行了评估。有109/129耳>为50%,20/129耳RW能见度为50% (P = 0.033; AUROC为0.689;敏感性为73.4%,特异性为69.2%,阈值为6.20),ICC = 0.598。成年患者面神经隐窝距离、面神经定位、改良RW位角度在RW可见性为50%的情况下均有所增加,但只有改良RW位角度在逐步回归上有统计学意义(P = 0.016; AUROC为0.805;敏感性为82.2%,特异性为71.4%,阈值为17.95),ICC = 0.578。结论:后鼓室切开术中RW的可见性可通过术前BB MRI确定。最佳的预测测量在成人和儿科患者之间有所不同,在成人患者中表现更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信