Efficacy of the combined approach in treating major salivary gland stones.

IF 2.2
Jesper Stensig Aa, Joyce Dominique Horsmans Schultz, Lars Peter Schousboe
{"title":"Efficacy of the combined approach in treating major salivary gland stones.","authors":"Jesper Stensig Aa, Joyce Dominique Horsmans Schultz, Lars Peter Schousboe","doi":"10.1007/s00405-025-09704-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the combined approach in managing large salivary gland stones, with specific focus on stone elimination, symptom resolution, and postoperative complications.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study was conducted at a tertiary referral centre, including patients diagnosed with sialolithiasis between 1 October 2018 and 1 October 2023. Patients treated with the combined approach were included; those managed solely with sialendoscopy, exclusively via incision, or conservative treatment were excluded. Medical records were reviewed for outcomes including stone removal success, symptom resolution, and complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 243 patients diagnosed with sialolithiasis, 33 underwent the combined approach - eight involving the parotid gland and 25 the submandibular gland. Complete stone removal was achieved in 28 cases (85%), and symptom resolution was observed in 29 cases (88%). Postoperative infections occurred in five parotid and four submandibular cases. Temporary tongue paraesthesia was noted in two submandibular cases; no nerve injuries were reported in parotid cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The combined approach is a safe and effective gland-preserving technique for large salivary gland stones, with high success rates and minimal complications. Prophylactic antibiotics may be beneficial for parotid procedures, though prospective studies are needed to define infection criteria and guide antibiotic use.</p>","PeriodicalId":520614,"journal":{"name":"European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-025-09704-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the combined approach in managing large salivary gland stones, with specific focus on stone elimination, symptom resolution, and postoperative complications.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted at a tertiary referral centre, including patients diagnosed with sialolithiasis between 1 October 2018 and 1 October 2023. Patients treated with the combined approach were included; those managed solely with sialendoscopy, exclusively via incision, or conservative treatment were excluded. Medical records were reviewed for outcomes including stone removal success, symptom resolution, and complications.

Results: Of 243 patients diagnosed with sialolithiasis, 33 underwent the combined approach - eight involving the parotid gland and 25 the submandibular gland. Complete stone removal was achieved in 28 cases (85%), and symptom resolution was observed in 29 cases (88%). Postoperative infections occurred in five parotid and four submandibular cases. Temporary tongue paraesthesia was noted in two submandibular cases; no nerve injuries were reported in parotid cases.

Conclusion: The combined approach is a safe and effective gland-preserving technique for large salivary gland stones, with high success rates and minimal complications. Prophylactic antibiotics may be beneficial for parotid procedures, though prospective studies are needed to define infection criteria and guide antibiotic use.

联合入路治疗大涎腺结石的疗效观察。
目的:评价联合入路治疗大唾液腺结石的疗效和安全性,特别关注结石消除、症状缓解和术后并发症。方法:在一家三级转诊中心进行了一项回顾性队列研究,包括2018年10月1日至2023年10月1日诊断为涎石症的患者。纳入采用联合入路治疗的患者;排除单纯通过鼻内镜、切口或保守治疗的患者。我们回顾了医疗记录的结果,包括结石清除成功、症状缓解和并发症。结果:243例涎石症患者中,33例行联合入路,其中8例经腮腺入路,25例经颌下腺入路。28例(85%)结石完全清除,29例(88%)症状缓解。术后腮腺感染5例,下颌骨感染4例。2例下颌下患者出现暂时性舌感异常;腮腺病例未见神经损伤。结论:联合入路治疗大唾液腺结石安全有效,成功率高,并发症少。预防性抗生素可能对腮腺手术有益,但需要前瞻性研究来确定感染标准并指导抗生素的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信