Efficacy and safety of bifidobacterium triple viable capsules combined with entecavir in the treatment of Hepatitis B cirrhosis.

IF 0.7
Rongquan Liu, Yun Ji, Jie Zhang
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of bifidobacterium triple viable capsules combined with entecavir in the treatment of Hepatitis B cirrhosis.","authors":"Rongquan Liu, Yun Ji, Jie Zhang","doi":"10.5507/bp.2025.026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Liver cirrhosis caused by hepatitis B is a critical progression of chronic hepatitis B. It is often accompanied by intestinal dysbiosis and impaired intestinal mucosal barrier function, which further exacerbate hepatic inflammation and fibrosis. Therefore, exploring effective combined therapeutic approaches to improve patient outcomes is of significant importance.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study compares the efficacy and safety of entecavir combined with bifidobacterium triple viable capsules versus entecavir alone in treating Hepatitis B cirrhosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective case-control study enrolled 110 patients with Hepatitis B cirrhosis diagnosed and treated from January 2021 to January 2024. The control group received entecavir alone, while the observation group received entecavir combined with bifidobacterium triple viable capsules Efficacy was assessed at 24 weeks and 48 weeks post-treatment. Comparisons were made between the two groups regarding changes in intestinal flora count, intestinal mucosal barrier function, liver function, HBV-DNA negativity rate, liver fibrosis indices, liver stiffness measurement (LSM), inflammatory factor indices, and treatment safety.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At 24 weeks and 48 weeks post-treatment, the observation group exhibited significant modulation of the intestinal microecology, with a notable decrease in the count of pathogenic bacteria (Candida albicans, Enterobacteriaceae, Enterococcus) in feces compared to pre-treatment and the control group (all P<0.05), and a significant increase in the count of probiotics (Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium) (all P<0.05). Meanwhile, the observation group showed more significant improvement in intestinal mucosal barrier function, with lower levels of endotoxin, D-lactic acid, and diamine oxidase compared to the control group (all P<0.05). Regarding liver-related indices, the observation group demonstrated significantly greater improvement in liver function (ALT, AST, TBIL, ALB), liver fibrosis markers (HA, PC-III, IV-C, LN), and LSM compared to the control group (all P<0.05), with more pronounced improvement at 48 weeks than at 24 weeks (P<0.05). Notably, the observation group exhibited a higher HBV-DNA negativity rate at 48 weeks (90.91% vs 76.36%, P=0.039) and superior regulation of inflammatory factors (decreased TNF-α, IL-6, IL-8, and increased IL-10) (all P<0.05). The final clinical efficacy assessment revealed a significantly higher total effective rate in the observation group compared to the control group (83.64% vs 65.45%, P=0.029). Adverse event rates were comparable between the observation and control groups (7.27% vs. 10.91%, P=0.507), supporting the safety of the intervention.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The treatment regimen of bifidobacterium triple viable capsules combined with entecavir is significantly superior to entecavir alone in improving intestinal flora, repairing the intestinal mucosal barrier, promoting liver function recovery, and alleviating liver fibrosis in patients with Hepatitis B cirrhosis. It also demonstrates more pronounced long-term efficacy, a higher HBV-DNA negativity rate, superior overall clinical efficacy, and good safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":520569,"journal":{"name":"Biomedical papers of the Medical Faculty of the University Palacky, Olomouc, Czechoslovakia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedical papers of the Medical Faculty of the University Palacky, Olomouc, Czechoslovakia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5507/bp.2025.026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Liver cirrhosis caused by hepatitis B is a critical progression of chronic hepatitis B. It is often accompanied by intestinal dysbiosis and impaired intestinal mucosal barrier function, which further exacerbate hepatic inflammation and fibrosis. Therefore, exploring effective combined therapeutic approaches to improve patient outcomes is of significant importance.

Objective: This study compares the efficacy and safety of entecavir combined with bifidobacterium triple viable capsules versus entecavir alone in treating Hepatitis B cirrhosis.

Methods: This retrospective case-control study enrolled 110 patients with Hepatitis B cirrhosis diagnosed and treated from January 2021 to January 2024. The control group received entecavir alone, while the observation group received entecavir combined with bifidobacterium triple viable capsules Efficacy was assessed at 24 weeks and 48 weeks post-treatment. Comparisons were made between the two groups regarding changes in intestinal flora count, intestinal mucosal barrier function, liver function, HBV-DNA negativity rate, liver fibrosis indices, liver stiffness measurement (LSM), inflammatory factor indices, and treatment safety.

Results: At 24 weeks and 48 weeks post-treatment, the observation group exhibited significant modulation of the intestinal microecology, with a notable decrease in the count of pathogenic bacteria (Candida albicans, Enterobacteriaceae, Enterococcus) in feces compared to pre-treatment and the control group (all P<0.05), and a significant increase in the count of probiotics (Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium) (all P<0.05). Meanwhile, the observation group showed more significant improvement in intestinal mucosal barrier function, with lower levels of endotoxin, D-lactic acid, and diamine oxidase compared to the control group (all P<0.05). Regarding liver-related indices, the observation group demonstrated significantly greater improvement in liver function (ALT, AST, TBIL, ALB), liver fibrosis markers (HA, PC-III, IV-C, LN), and LSM compared to the control group (all P<0.05), with more pronounced improvement at 48 weeks than at 24 weeks (P<0.05). Notably, the observation group exhibited a higher HBV-DNA negativity rate at 48 weeks (90.91% vs 76.36%, P=0.039) and superior regulation of inflammatory factors (decreased TNF-α, IL-6, IL-8, and increased IL-10) (all P<0.05). The final clinical efficacy assessment revealed a significantly higher total effective rate in the observation group compared to the control group (83.64% vs 65.45%, P=0.029). Adverse event rates were comparable between the observation and control groups (7.27% vs. 10.91%, P=0.507), supporting the safety of the intervention.

Conclusion: The treatment regimen of bifidobacterium triple viable capsules combined with entecavir is significantly superior to entecavir alone in improving intestinal flora, repairing the intestinal mucosal barrier, promoting liver function recovery, and alleviating liver fibrosis in patients with Hepatitis B cirrhosis. It also demonstrates more pronounced long-term efficacy, a higher HBV-DNA negativity rate, superior overall clinical efficacy, and good safety.

双歧杆菌三联活菌胶囊联合恩替卡韦治疗乙型肝炎肝硬化的疗效和安全性。
背景:乙型肝炎肝硬化是慢性乙型肝炎的关键进展,常伴有肠道生态失调和肠黏膜屏障功能受损,进一步加剧肝脏炎症和纤维化。因此,探索有效的联合治疗方法以改善患者预后具有重要意义。目的:比较恩替卡韦联合双歧杆菌三联活菌胶囊与单独恩替卡韦治疗乙型肝炎肝硬化的疗效和安全性。方法:本回顾性病例对照研究纳入了2021年1月至2024年1月诊断和治疗的110例乙型肝炎肝硬化患者。对照组患者单独给予恩替卡韦治疗,观察组患者给予恩替卡韦联合双歧杆菌三联活菌胶囊治疗,分别于治疗后24周和48周评价疗效。比较两组患者肠道菌群计数、肠黏膜屏障功能、肝功能、HBV-DNA阴性率、肝纤维化指标、肝硬度测量(LSM)、炎症因子指标及治疗安全性的变化。结果:治疗后24周和48周,观察组患者肠道微生态得到明显调节,粪便中病原菌(白色念珠菌、肠杆菌科、肠球菌)数量较治疗前和对照组明显减少(均为p组)。双歧杆菌三联活菌胶囊联合恩替卡韦治疗方案在改善乙型肝炎肝硬化患者肠道菌群、修复肠黏膜屏障、促进肝功能恢复、缓解肝纤维化等方面均明显优于单独恩替卡韦治疗方案。长期疗效显著,HBV-DNA阴性率较高,临床总体疗效优越,安全性好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书