Distinct gut microbiota profiles in acute vs. chronic sinusitis: potential biomarkers.

IF 2.2
Hongwei Cao, Yan Fan, Hanbing Yu, Dongsheng Xing, Aihui Yan
{"title":"Distinct gut microbiota profiles in acute vs. chronic sinusitis: potential biomarkers.","authors":"Hongwei Cao, Yan Fan, Hanbing Yu, Dongsheng Xing, Aihui Yan","doi":"10.1007/s00405-025-09714-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study explored the causal association between genetically predicted gut microbiota and sinusitis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) study used summary data from genome-wide association studies of gut microbiota (n = 211) and acute and chronic sinusitis. The main analysis was conducted using the inverse variance weighted (IVW) method as primary statistical analysis, with robustness tested using the weighted median, weighted mode, and MR-Egger regression methods. Sensitivity analyses included MR-Egger, MR-PRESSO, Cochran's Q, and leave-one-out for the detection of heterogeneity and pleiotropy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Suggestive associations with acute sinusitis were identified for order Rhodospirillales (OR = 1.20, P = 0.01) and family Prevotellaceae (OR = 1.19, P = 0.02). Protective associations included genus Subdoligranulum (OR = 0.78, P = 0.01). For chronic sinusitis, significant associations were found for genus Coprobacter (OR = 1.23, P = 0.01), while protective associations included family Defluviitaleaceae (OR = 0.84, P = 0.04) and genus Tyzzerella3 (OR = 0.87, P = 0.011). Additional significant protective associations were observed across various other taxa, including order Burkholderiales and family Erysipelotrichaceae. However, none of these associations remained statistically significant after FDR correction. Sensitivity analyses supported the overall robustness of the findings.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This MR study provides exploratory evidence for potential associations between gut microbiota and sinusitis subtypes. Although these findings did not remain significant after correction for multiple testing, they highlight distinct microbial patterns in acute versus chronic sinusitis and may serve as hypotheses for future research. Further studies with larger cohorts are required to validate these associations and assess their clinical relevance.</p>","PeriodicalId":520614,"journal":{"name":"European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-025-09714-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study explored the causal association between genetically predicted gut microbiota and sinusitis.

Methods: This two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) study used summary data from genome-wide association studies of gut microbiota (n = 211) and acute and chronic sinusitis. The main analysis was conducted using the inverse variance weighted (IVW) method as primary statistical analysis, with robustness tested using the weighted median, weighted mode, and MR-Egger regression methods. Sensitivity analyses included MR-Egger, MR-PRESSO, Cochran's Q, and leave-one-out for the detection of heterogeneity and pleiotropy.

Results: Suggestive associations with acute sinusitis were identified for order Rhodospirillales (OR = 1.20, P = 0.01) and family Prevotellaceae (OR = 1.19, P = 0.02). Protective associations included genus Subdoligranulum (OR = 0.78, P = 0.01). For chronic sinusitis, significant associations were found for genus Coprobacter (OR = 1.23, P = 0.01), while protective associations included family Defluviitaleaceae (OR = 0.84, P = 0.04) and genus Tyzzerella3 (OR = 0.87, P = 0.011). Additional significant protective associations were observed across various other taxa, including order Burkholderiales and family Erysipelotrichaceae. However, none of these associations remained statistically significant after FDR correction. Sensitivity analyses supported the overall robustness of the findings.

Conclusion: This MR study provides exploratory evidence for potential associations between gut microbiota and sinusitis subtypes. Although these findings did not remain significant after correction for multiple testing, they highlight distinct microbial patterns in acute versus chronic sinusitis and may serve as hypotheses for future research. Further studies with larger cohorts are required to validate these associations and assess their clinical relevance.

急性与慢性鼻窦炎不同的肠道微生物群特征:潜在的生物标志物。
目的:本研究探讨基因预测的肠道微生物群与鼻窦炎之间的因果关系。方法:这项双样本孟德尔随机化(MR)研究使用了肠道微生物群(n = 211)与急性和慢性鼻窦炎全基因组关联研究的汇总数据。主分析采用逆方差加权法(IVW)作为主要统计分析,采用加权中位数、加权模式和MR-Egger回归方法进行稳健性检验。敏感性分析包括MR-Egger、MR-PRESSO、Cochran’s Q和leave- 1,用于检测异质性和多效性。结果:红螺旋菌目(OR = 1.20, P = 0.01)和普氏菌科(OR = 1.19, P = 0.02)与急性鼻窦炎有相关性。保护性关联包括Subdoligranulum属(OR = 0.78, P = 0.01)。慢性鼻窦炎与Coprobacter属相关(OR = 1.23, P = 0.01),与Defluviitaleaceae科相关(OR = 0.84, P = 0.04),与Tyzzerella3属相关(OR = 0.87, P = 0.011)。此外,在其他分类群中还观察到显著的保护关联,包括伯克氏目和丹毒科。然而,经过FDR校正后,这些关联都没有统计学意义。敏感性分析支持了研究结果的总体稳健性。结论:这项MR研究为肠道微生物群和鼻窦炎亚型之间的潜在关联提供了探索性证据。虽然这些发现在多次测试校正后并没有保持显著性,但它们突出了急性和慢性鼻窦炎中不同的微生物模式,并可能为未来的研究提供假设。需要更大规模的进一步研究来验证这些关联并评估其临床相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信