Test-retest reliability of the phase coordination index - A measure of bilateral coordination.

IF 2.4
Sutton B Richmond, Clayton W Swanson, Steven P Winesett, Jungyun Hwang, Brianne Borgia, David J Clark
{"title":"Test-retest reliability of the phase coordination index - A measure of bilateral coordination.","authors":"Sutton B Richmond, Clayton W Swanson, Steven P Winesett, Jungyun Hwang, Brianne Borgia, David J Clark","doi":"10.1016/j.gaitpost.2025.109984","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Synchronized left-right stepping (bilateral coordination) is essential for safe movement and independent mobility function. The phase coordination index (PCI) quantifies this coordination. This study aimed to assess the reliability of PCI when measured multiple times within a study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty-three neurotypical older adults completed a single 2-min walk test, three weeks apart, to assess the reliability and consistency of the PCI. During the 2-min walk test, participants walked along a 15-m hallway at their preferred natural speed while wearing seven inertial monitoring units. PCI was first calculated for each trial using the standard method and then normalized to gait speed using two approaches. The normalization methods included dividing each PCI value by: (1) the mean gait speed of the individual trial, and (2) the mean gait speed averaged across both trials.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The reliability (ICC) values were 0.566 for PCI alone, 0.771 when adjusted for gait speed at each trial, and 0.784 when adjusted for gait speed over both trials. Bland-Altman analysis showed no significant bias between trials across analyses.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings suggest that PCI offers acceptable test-retest reliability. However, the results of this investigation advocate for normalizing PCI to gait speed for enhanced reliability.</p>","PeriodicalId":94018,"journal":{"name":"Gait & posture","volume":" ","pages":"109984"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gait & posture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2025.109984","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Synchronized left-right stepping (bilateral coordination) is essential for safe movement and independent mobility function. The phase coordination index (PCI) quantifies this coordination. This study aimed to assess the reliability of PCI when measured multiple times within a study.

Methods: Forty-three neurotypical older adults completed a single 2-min walk test, three weeks apart, to assess the reliability and consistency of the PCI. During the 2-min walk test, participants walked along a 15-m hallway at their preferred natural speed while wearing seven inertial monitoring units. PCI was first calculated for each trial using the standard method and then normalized to gait speed using two approaches. The normalization methods included dividing each PCI value by: (1) the mean gait speed of the individual trial, and (2) the mean gait speed averaged across both trials.

Results: The reliability (ICC) values were 0.566 for PCI alone, 0.771 when adjusted for gait speed at each trial, and 0.784 when adjusted for gait speed over both trials. Bland-Altman analysis showed no significant bias between trials across analyses.

Conclusion: These findings suggest that PCI offers acceptable test-retest reliability. However, the results of this investigation advocate for normalizing PCI to gait speed for enhanced reliability.

相位协调指数的重测可靠性。双边协调的一种度量。
目的:同步左右步(双侧协调)对安全运动和独立活动功能至关重要。相位协调指数(PCI)量化了这种协调。本研究旨在评估在一项研究中多次测量PCI的可靠性。方法:43名神经正常的老年人完成了一次2分钟步行测试,间隔3周,以评估PCI的可靠性和一致性。在2分钟的步行测试中,参与者穿着7个惯性监测装置,以他们喜欢的自然速度沿着15米长的走廊行走。首先使用标准方法计算每次试验的PCI,然后使用两种方法将其归一化为步态速度。归一化方法包括将每个PCI值除以:(1)单个试验的平均步态速度,(2)两个试验的平均步态速度。结果:单独PCI的可靠性(ICC)值为0.566,每次试验调整步态速度时为0.771,两次试验调整步态速度时为0.784。Bland-Altman分析显示各试验间无显著偏倚。结论:这些发现表明PCI提供了可接受的重测可靠性。然而,本研究的结果提倡将PCI规范化以提高可靠性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信