The Outcomes of Concomitant Carotid Endarterectomy and Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.

IF 0.6
Mehmet Şanser Ateş, Eray Aksoy, Zümrüt Tuba Demirözü, Sami Gürkahraman
{"title":"The Outcomes of Concomitant Carotid Endarterectomy and Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.","authors":"Mehmet Şanser Ateş, Eray Aksoy, Zümrüt Tuba Demirözü, Sami Gürkahraman","doi":"10.5543/tkda.2025.99650","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Limited data exist on the combined use of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCABG).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This retrospective study collected data from 42 patients who underwent simultaneous carotid endarterectomy and off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting between November 2015 and June 2023 at two affiliated institutions. CEA was performed first via eversion endarterectomy, followed by OPCABG using mostly arterial grafts on a beating heart, primarily with a \"no-touch\" aortic technique. Patient data were obtained from digital hospital records, and follow-up was completed through electronic systems or phone contact.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 1,154 OPCABG patients, 42 (3.6%) underwent simultaneous CEA, with a median age of 72 (range: 59-84); 35 patients (83.3%) were male and seven (16.7%) female. All patients were asymptomatic for carotid disease and diagnosed preoperatively via routine Doppler ultrasound. Complete arterial revascularization without aortic manipulation was achieved in 83.3% of cases, with a mean of 3.66 +- 1.22 distal anastomoses. Early mortality occurred in one critically ill patient (2.4%). One patient (2.4%) experienced a postoperative transient ischemic attack and recovered without neurologic sequelae. Seventeen patients (40.4%) were extubated in the operating room. During follow-up, no patients experienced cerebrovascular events; two patients died due to non-cardiac disease. As all events occurred within the first year, the Kaplan-Meier one-, three-, and five-year stroke-free survival rates were identical at 92.6 +- 4.1%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Concomitant CEA and OPCABG surgery is considered the optimal strategy for patients with extensive carotid and coronary artery stenosis at experienced centers. It is an achievable treatment that minimizes the risk of postoperative cerebrovascular events and cognitive deficits.</p>","PeriodicalId":94261,"journal":{"name":"Turk Kardiyoloji Dernegi arsivi : Turk Kardiyoloji Derneginin yayin organidir","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turk Kardiyoloji Dernegi arsivi : Turk Kardiyoloji Derneginin yayin organidir","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5543/tkda.2025.99650","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Limited data exist on the combined use of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCABG).

Method: This retrospective study collected data from 42 patients who underwent simultaneous carotid endarterectomy and off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting between November 2015 and June 2023 at two affiliated institutions. CEA was performed first via eversion endarterectomy, followed by OPCABG using mostly arterial grafts on a beating heart, primarily with a "no-touch" aortic technique. Patient data were obtained from digital hospital records, and follow-up was completed through electronic systems or phone contact.

Results: Among 1,154 OPCABG patients, 42 (3.6%) underwent simultaneous CEA, with a median age of 72 (range: 59-84); 35 patients (83.3%) were male and seven (16.7%) female. All patients were asymptomatic for carotid disease and diagnosed preoperatively via routine Doppler ultrasound. Complete arterial revascularization without aortic manipulation was achieved in 83.3% of cases, with a mean of 3.66 +- 1.22 distal anastomoses. Early mortality occurred in one critically ill patient (2.4%). One patient (2.4%) experienced a postoperative transient ischemic attack and recovered without neurologic sequelae. Seventeen patients (40.4%) were extubated in the operating room. During follow-up, no patients experienced cerebrovascular events; two patients died due to non-cardiac disease. As all events occurred within the first year, the Kaplan-Meier one-, three-, and five-year stroke-free survival rates were identical at 92.6 +- 4.1%.

Conclusion: Concomitant CEA and OPCABG surgery is considered the optimal strategy for patients with extensive carotid and coronary artery stenosis at experienced centers. It is an achievable treatment that minimizes the risk of postoperative cerebrovascular events and cognitive deficits.

颈动脉内膜切除术联合非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术的疗效。
目的:颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)和非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术(OPCABG)联合应用的数据有限。方法:本回顾性研究收集了两所附属机构2015年11月至2023年6月期间同时行颈动脉内膜切除术和非体外循环冠状动脉搭桥术的42例患者的数据。CEA首先通过外翻动脉内膜切除术进行,其次是OPCABG,主要是在跳动的心脏上使用动脉移植物,主要是“无接触”主动脉技术。患者数据从数字医院记录中获取,并通过电子系统或电话联系完成随访。结果:在1154例OPCABG患者中,42例(3.6%)同时行CEA,中位年龄为72岁(范围:59-84);男性35例(83.3%),女性7例(16.7%)。所有患者均无颈动脉疾病症状,术前常规多普勒超声诊断。83.3%的病例在没有主动脉操作的情况下实现了完全的动脉血运重建,平均3.66 +- 1.22远端吻合。1例危重患者发生早期死亡(2.4%)。1例(2.4%)患者术后短暂性脑缺血发作,恢复后无神经系统后遗症。17例患者(40.4%)在手术室拔管。随访期间,无患者发生脑血管事件;2例患者死于非心脏疾病。由于所有事件都发生在第一年,Kaplan-Meier 1年、3年和5年无卒中生存率相同,为92.6±4.1%。结论:在经验丰富的中心,对于颈动脉和冠状动脉广泛狭窄的患者,联合CEA和OPCABG手术被认为是最佳策略。这是一种可实现的治疗方法,可将术后脑血管事件和认知缺陷的风险降至最低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信