Reduced cognitive resources induces risky stepping strategies in older adults.

IF 2.4
Adam J Cocks, William R Young, Toby J Ellmers
{"title":"Reduced cognitive resources induces risky stepping strategies in older adults.","authors":"Adam J Cocks, William R Young, Toby J Ellmers","doi":"10.1016/j.gaitpost.2025.109989","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Falls frequently occur during situations that require a transfer or shift of bodyweight (e.g., stepping around an obstacle or turning). One contributor to falls in this scenario is a risky stepping strategy known as 'cross-stepping', whereby the feet cross over during the step. However, contributors to this potentially dangerous stepping strategy are not understood. This study examined whether reduced cognitive resources are a contributor to 'cross-stepping'.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifty-one older adults without neurological, musculoskeletal, or major cognitive impairment participated. Participants completed a modified multitarget stepping task while traversing a GAITRite walkway containing stepping targets forming paths of various colors. Participants walked designated color paths under single-task (normal walking) and a dual-task (serial subtraction) condition designed to reduce cognitive resources available for walking. The number of cross-steps and stepping errors were assessed. Cognitive performance, gait velocity, and double-limb support (% of gait cycle) were also collected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During single-task conditions, measures of executive function (set-shifting)/attention (Trail Making Test-Part B) independently predicted greater cross-steps (B=0.01, p = .025). Walking under dual-task conditions significantly increased cross-steps (p = .001). Gait velocity also significantly decreased when compared to single-task, whilst global stepping errors and percentage of the gait cycle spent in double-limb support significantly increased.</p><p><strong>Significance: </strong>These findings suggest that cross-steps can result from reduced cognitive resources being allocated to movement planning and execution. Future research should seek to explore if the relationship between cognition and cross-stepping is causally linked to increased fall risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":94018,"journal":{"name":"Gait & posture","volume":" ","pages":"109989"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gait & posture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2025.109989","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Falls frequently occur during situations that require a transfer or shift of bodyweight (e.g., stepping around an obstacle or turning). One contributor to falls in this scenario is a risky stepping strategy known as 'cross-stepping', whereby the feet cross over during the step. However, contributors to this potentially dangerous stepping strategy are not understood. This study examined whether reduced cognitive resources are a contributor to 'cross-stepping'.

Methods: Fifty-one older adults without neurological, musculoskeletal, or major cognitive impairment participated. Participants completed a modified multitarget stepping task while traversing a GAITRite walkway containing stepping targets forming paths of various colors. Participants walked designated color paths under single-task (normal walking) and a dual-task (serial subtraction) condition designed to reduce cognitive resources available for walking. The number of cross-steps and stepping errors were assessed. Cognitive performance, gait velocity, and double-limb support (% of gait cycle) were also collected.

Results: During single-task conditions, measures of executive function (set-shifting)/attention (Trail Making Test-Part B) independently predicted greater cross-steps (B=0.01, p = .025). Walking under dual-task conditions significantly increased cross-steps (p = .001). Gait velocity also significantly decreased when compared to single-task, whilst global stepping errors and percentage of the gait cycle spent in double-limb support significantly increased.

Significance: These findings suggest that cross-steps can result from reduced cognitive resources being allocated to movement planning and execution. Future research should seek to explore if the relationship between cognition and cross-stepping is causally linked to increased fall risk.

认知资源减少导致老年人采取危险的步进策略。
背景:摔倒经常发生在需要转移或转移体重的情况下(例如,绕过障碍物或转弯)。在这种情况下摔倒的一个原因是一种被称为“交叉行走”的冒险的行走策略,即在行走过程中双脚交叉。然而,造成这种潜在危险的步进策略的原因尚不清楚。这项研究调查了认知资源的减少是否与“跨步”有关。方法:51名没有神经、肌肉骨骼或主要认知障碍的老年人参与了这项研究。参与者完成了一项改进的多目标步进任务,同时穿越GAITRite步道,其中包含形成各种颜色路径的步进目标。参与者在单任务(正常行走)和双任务(连续减法)条件下行走指定的颜色路径,旨在减少行走可用的认知资源。评估了交叉步数和步进误差。同时收集认知能力、步态速度和双肢支持度(占步态周期的百分比)。结果:在单任务条件下,执行功能(集合转移)/注意力(轨迹制造测试-部分B)的测量独立地预测了更大的跨步(B=0.01, p = .025)。在双重任务条件下行走显著增加了交叉步数(p = .001)。与单任务相比,步态速度也显着降低,而全局步进误差和用于四肢支持的步态周期百分比显着增加。意义:这些发现表明,跨步可能是由于分配给运动计划和执行的认知资源减少所致。未来的研究应该寻求探索认知和跨步之间的关系是否与跌倒风险增加有因果关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信