Perceptions and experiences of the prevention, testing, and treatment of anaemia in pregnant women: A qualitative evidence synthesis.

IF 2.5
PLOS global public health Pub Date : 2025-10-01 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pgph.0005158
Ebony Verbunt, Martha Vazquez Corona, Özge Tunçalp, Lisa M Rogers, Khic-Houy Prang, Cathy Vaughan, Meghan A Bohren
{"title":"Perceptions and experiences of the prevention, testing, and treatment of anaemia in pregnant women: A qualitative evidence synthesis.","authors":"Ebony Verbunt, Martha Vazquez Corona, Özge Tunçalp, Lisa M Rogers, Khic-Houy Prang, Cathy Vaughan, Meghan A Bohren","doi":"10.1371/journal.pgph.0005158","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Anaemia during pregnancy is a serious public health problem, inequitably burdening women in low-and middle-income countries. Despite numerous strategies and programs, anaemia prevalence rates have stagnated. We aimed to explore women's, health workers', and other key stakeholders' perceptions of anaemia in pregnant women, or their experiences with its prevention, testing, or treatment. We conducted a qualitative evidence synthesis. We searched MEDLINE (Ovid), Scopus, and CINAHL from inception to 12 November 2024, with no language or geographical restrictions. Data were analysed using thematic synthesis, and confidence in each review finding was assessed using the GRADE-CERQual approach. We included 61 papers from 23 countries. We grouped 25 review findings under four themes: (a) socio-cultural context of anaemia in pregnant women; (b) prevention and/or treatment of anaemia in pregnant women through diet, supplementation, or clinical intervention; (c) testing pregnant women for anaemia; and (d) factors affecting health workers' engagement in the management of anaemia in pregnant women. Women's management of anaemia in pregnancy was affected by the socio-cultural context, particularly their limited decision-making power and social position. Many women perceived a nutritious diet as integral to managing anaemia; however, high cost was often a barrier. Reasons women did not adhere to supplements included side-effects and difficulty remembering to take them, with family support improving adherence. Blood transfusion was perceived as treatment for severe anaemia, while intravenous iron was considered for women with iron-deficiency anaemia who were unable to take supplements, attended antenatal care late, or could not receive a transfusion. Health workers described difficulties testing pregnant women for anaemia and structural health-system deficiencies that affected their engagement. Findings may inform future WHO recommendations for managing anaemia in pregnant women. Future research could use review findings alongside implementation science frameworks to develop strategies for improving prevention, testing, and/or treatment of anaemia in pregnant women.</p>","PeriodicalId":74466,"journal":{"name":"PLOS global public health","volume":"5 10","pages":"e0005158"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12488017/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLOS global public health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0005158","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Anaemia during pregnancy is a serious public health problem, inequitably burdening women in low-and middle-income countries. Despite numerous strategies and programs, anaemia prevalence rates have stagnated. We aimed to explore women's, health workers', and other key stakeholders' perceptions of anaemia in pregnant women, or their experiences with its prevention, testing, or treatment. We conducted a qualitative evidence synthesis. We searched MEDLINE (Ovid), Scopus, and CINAHL from inception to 12 November 2024, with no language or geographical restrictions. Data were analysed using thematic synthesis, and confidence in each review finding was assessed using the GRADE-CERQual approach. We included 61 papers from 23 countries. We grouped 25 review findings under four themes: (a) socio-cultural context of anaemia in pregnant women; (b) prevention and/or treatment of anaemia in pregnant women through diet, supplementation, or clinical intervention; (c) testing pregnant women for anaemia; and (d) factors affecting health workers' engagement in the management of anaemia in pregnant women. Women's management of anaemia in pregnancy was affected by the socio-cultural context, particularly their limited decision-making power and social position. Many women perceived a nutritious diet as integral to managing anaemia; however, high cost was often a barrier. Reasons women did not adhere to supplements included side-effects and difficulty remembering to take them, with family support improving adherence. Blood transfusion was perceived as treatment for severe anaemia, while intravenous iron was considered for women with iron-deficiency anaemia who were unable to take supplements, attended antenatal care late, or could not receive a transfusion. Health workers described difficulties testing pregnant women for anaemia and structural health-system deficiencies that affected their engagement. Findings may inform future WHO recommendations for managing anaemia in pregnant women. Future research could use review findings alongside implementation science frameworks to develop strategies for improving prevention, testing, and/or treatment of anaemia in pregnant women.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

对孕妇贫血的预防、检测和治疗的认识和经验:定性证据综合。
怀孕期间贫血是一个严重的公共卫生问题,给低收入和中等收入国家的妇女造成了不公平的负担。尽管有许多战略和规划,贫血患病率仍停滞不前。我们的目的是探讨妇女、卫生工作者和其他主要利益攸关方对孕妇贫血的看法,或他们在预防、检测或治疗贫血方面的经验。我们进行了定性证据合成。我们检索了MEDLINE (Ovid)、Scopus和CINAHL从成立到2024年11月12日,没有语言和地域限制。使用专题综合分析数据,并使用GRADE-CERQual方法评估每个综述发现的置信度。我们收录了来自23个国家的61篇论文。我们根据四个主题对25项审查结果进行了分组:(a)孕妇贫血的社会文化背景;(b)通过饮食、补充剂或临床干预预防和/或治疗孕妇贫血;(c)为孕妇进行贫血检查;(d)影响保健工作者参与管理孕妇贫血的因素。妇女对妊娠期贫血的管理受到社会文化背景的影响,特别是她们有限的决策权和社会地位。许多妇女认为营养饮食是治疗贫血的必要条件;然而,高成本往往是一个障碍。女性没有坚持服用补充剂的原因包括副作用和难以记住服用它们,而家人的支持有助于坚持服用。输血被认为是治疗严重贫血的一种方法,而静脉注射铁则被认为是治疗缺铁性贫血的妇女,这些妇女无法服用补充剂、产前护理较晚或无法接受输血。卫生工作者描述了检测孕妇贫血的困难和结构性卫生系统缺陷,这些都影响了他们的参与。研究结果可为世卫组织今后关于管理孕妇贫血的建议提供参考。未来的研究可以利用审查结果和实施科学框架来制定改进孕妇贫血的预防、检测和/或治疗的战略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信