Artificial intelligence models for predicting pulmonary complications in patients with chest trauma: a retrospective study.

IF 0.2
Journal of Trauma and Injury Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-29 DOI:10.20408/jti.2025.0100
Junepill Seok, Jinseok Lee, Wu Seong Kang
{"title":"Artificial intelligence models for predicting pulmonary complications in patients with chest trauma: a retrospective study.","authors":"Junepill Seok, Jinseok Lee, Wu Seong Kang","doi":"10.20408/jti.2025.0100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Pulmonary complications, including pneumonia and respiratory failure, continue to be major contributors to morbidity and mortality in patients with chest trauma. Although several artificial intelligence (AI) models have been developed to predict trauma mortality, there remains a lack of AI-based prediction models specifically targeting pulmonary complications in chest trauma. To address this gap, we developed and validated an explainable AI model for predicting pulmonary complications.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective analysis included 1,040 patients with blunt chest trauma who were treated at a single regional trauma center between January 2019 and March 2023. Pulmonary complications were defined as pneumonia, prolonged mechanical ventilation (>48 hours), or other major thoracic complications necessitating surgical intervention. Machine learning algorithms, including extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), random forest, adaptive boosting (AdaBoost), light gradient boosting machine (LightGBM), and a deep neural network, were trained using hyperparameter tuning and threefold cross-validation. Model performance was evaluated by sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, balanced accuracy, F1 score, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Model interpretability was assessed using Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) values.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the total cohort, 188 patients (18.1%) developed pulmonary complications. In the independent testing dataset (n=208), XGBoost achieved the highest AUC (0.856), while AdaBoost demonstrated the highest balanced accuracy (0.779). All machine learning models outperformed conventional scoring systems. SHAP analysis identified key predictors of pulmonary complications, including age, Injury Severity Score, Glasgow Coma Scale score, Abbreviated Injury Scale of the extremity or head, initial PaO2 to fraction of inspired oxygen ratio, location of the primary rib fracture, and presence of flail motion.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The developed AI model accurately predicts pulmonary complications in patients with chest trauma and outperforms traditional prognostic tools. The model's explainability offers actionable clinical insights, supporting early risk stratification and evidence-based decision-making in trauma care.</p>","PeriodicalId":52698,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Trauma and Injury","volume":"38 3","pages":"237-247"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12489154/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Trauma and Injury","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20408/jti.2025.0100","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Pulmonary complications, including pneumonia and respiratory failure, continue to be major contributors to morbidity and mortality in patients with chest trauma. Although several artificial intelligence (AI) models have been developed to predict trauma mortality, there remains a lack of AI-based prediction models specifically targeting pulmonary complications in chest trauma. To address this gap, we developed and validated an explainable AI model for predicting pulmonary complications.

Methods: This retrospective analysis included 1,040 patients with blunt chest trauma who were treated at a single regional trauma center between January 2019 and March 2023. Pulmonary complications were defined as pneumonia, prolonged mechanical ventilation (>48 hours), or other major thoracic complications necessitating surgical intervention. Machine learning algorithms, including extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), random forest, adaptive boosting (AdaBoost), light gradient boosting machine (LightGBM), and a deep neural network, were trained using hyperparameter tuning and threefold cross-validation. Model performance was evaluated by sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, balanced accuracy, F1 score, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Model interpretability was assessed using Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) values.

Results: Among the total cohort, 188 patients (18.1%) developed pulmonary complications. In the independent testing dataset (n=208), XGBoost achieved the highest AUC (0.856), while AdaBoost demonstrated the highest balanced accuracy (0.779). All machine learning models outperformed conventional scoring systems. SHAP analysis identified key predictors of pulmonary complications, including age, Injury Severity Score, Glasgow Coma Scale score, Abbreviated Injury Scale of the extremity or head, initial PaO2 to fraction of inspired oxygen ratio, location of the primary rib fracture, and presence of flail motion.

Conclusions: The developed AI model accurately predicts pulmonary complications in patients with chest trauma and outperforms traditional prognostic tools. The model's explainability offers actionable clinical insights, supporting early risk stratification and evidence-based decision-making in trauma care.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

预测胸部创伤患者肺部并发症的人工智能模型:一项回顾性研究。
目的:肺部并发症,包括肺炎和呼吸衰竭,仍然是胸外伤患者发病率和死亡率的主要原因。尽管已经开发了几种人工智能(AI)模型来预测创伤死亡率,但仍然缺乏专门针对胸部创伤中肺部并发症的基于AI的预测模型。为了解决这一差距,我们开发并验证了一个可解释的人工智能模型,用于预测肺部并发症。方法:本回顾性分析包括2019年1月至2023年3月在单一区域创伤中心治疗的1040例钝性胸部创伤患者。肺部并发症定义为肺炎、延长机械通气时间(bbb48小时)或其他需要手术干预的主要胸部并发症。机器学习算法,包括极端梯度增强(XGBoost)、随机森林、自适应增强(AdaBoost)、光梯度增强机(LightGBM)和深度神经网络,使用超参数调谐和三重交叉验证进行训练。通过敏感性、特异性、准确性、平衡准确性、F1评分和受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)来评价模型的性能。采用Shapley加性解释(SHAP)值评估模型可解释性。结果:在整个队列中,188例患者(18.1%)出现肺部并发症。在独立测试数据集(n=208)中,XGBoost实现了最高的AUC(0.856),而AdaBoost显示了最高的平衡精度(0.779)。所有的机器学习模型都优于传统的评分系统。SHAP分析确定了肺部并发症的关键预测因素,包括年龄、损伤严重程度评分、格拉斯哥昏迷评分、四肢或头部简略损伤评分、初始PaO2与吸入氧的比例、主要肋骨骨折的位置和连枷运动的存在。结论:所建立的人工智能模型能够准确预测胸外伤患者的肺部并发症,优于传统的预后工具。该模型的可解释性提供了可操作的临床见解,支持创伤护理的早期风险分层和循证决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信