Comparison of the postoperative analgesic efficacy of pericapsular nerve group block (PENG) and anterior quadratus lumborum block in hip fracture surgery: A prospective randomized study.

IF 2.9 4区 综合性期刊 Q2 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Serpil Şehirlioğlu, Döndü G Moralar
{"title":"Comparison of the postoperative analgesic efficacy of pericapsular nerve group block (PENG) and anterior quadratus lumborum block in hip fracture surgery: A prospective randomized study.","authors":"Serpil Şehirlioğlu, Döndü G Moralar","doi":"10.1177/00368504251382032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveIn recent years, the pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block and anterior quadratus lumborum block (aQLB) have emerged as regional anesthesia techniques commonly used for pain control after hip surgery. This study compared their analgesic efficacy during the first 48 hours following surgery under spinal anesthesia.MethodsIn this prospective, randomized, single-blinded study, patients were assigned to either the PENG (<i>n</i> = 43) or the aQLB group (<i>n</i> = 30). The primary outcome of the study was the total tramadol consumption within the first 48 hours postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included time to first rescue analgesia, resting and dynamic NRS pain scores at 2, 12, 24, and 48 hours postoperatively, and the incidence of complications.ResultsIn this study, postoperative tramadol consumption within the first 48 hours was significantly lower in the PENG (96.74 ± 77.36 mg) compared to the aQLB group (196.33 ± 157.43 mg) (<i>p</i> = 0.004). Additionally, the time to first rescue analgesia was significantly longer in the PENG (9.03 ± 7.67 hours) than in the aQLB group (6.81 ± 6.70 hours) (<i>p</i> = 0.048). NRS scores were similar between the groups at all time points. Quadriceps weakness was not observed in any patient.ConclusionThe PENG block provides effective postoperative analgesia without causing motor blockade, making it advantageous for early mobilization in patients undergoing hip surgery. It can be used as a part of multimodal analgesia.</p>","PeriodicalId":56061,"journal":{"name":"Science Progress","volume":"108 4","pages":"368504251382032"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12489222/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science Progress","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00368504251382032","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ObjectiveIn recent years, the pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block and anterior quadratus lumborum block (aQLB) have emerged as regional anesthesia techniques commonly used for pain control after hip surgery. This study compared their analgesic efficacy during the first 48 hours following surgery under spinal anesthesia.MethodsIn this prospective, randomized, single-blinded study, patients were assigned to either the PENG (n = 43) or the aQLB group (n = 30). The primary outcome of the study was the total tramadol consumption within the first 48 hours postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included time to first rescue analgesia, resting and dynamic NRS pain scores at 2, 12, 24, and 48 hours postoperatively, and the incidence of complications.ResultsIn this study, postoperative tramadol consumption within the first 48 hours was significantly lower in the PENG (96.74 ± 77.36 mg) compared to the aQLB group (196.33 ± 157.43 mg) (p = 0.004). Additionally, the time to first rescue analgesia was significantly longer in the PENG (9.03 ± 7.67 hours) than in the aQLB group (6.81 ± 6.70 hours) (p = 0.048). NRS scores were similar between the groups at all time points. Quadriceps weakness was not observed in any patient.ConclusionThe PENG block provides effective postoperative analgesia without causing motor blockade, making it advantageous for early mobilization in patients undergoing hip surgery. It can be used as a part of multimodal analgesia.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

髋部骨折术后囊包神经群阻滞与腰前方肌阻滞镇痛效果比较:一项前瞻性随机研究。
目的近年来,囊周神经阻滞(PENG)和腰前方肌阻滞(aQLB)作为区域麻醉技术被广泛应用于髋关节术后疼痛控制。本研究比较了脊髓麻醉下手术后48小时的镇痛效果。方法在这项前瞻性、随机、单盲研究中,患者被分为PENG组(n = 43)和aQLB组(n = 30)。研究的主要结果是术后48小时内曲马多的总消耗量。次要结局包括首次镇痛时间,术后2、12、24和48小时静息和动态NRS疼痛评分,以及并发症的发生率。结果与aQLB组(196.33±157.43 mg)相比,PENG组术后48小时曲马多用量(96.74±77.36 mg)显著降低(p = 0.004)。此外,PENG组首次抢救镇痛时间(9.03±7.67小时)明显长于aQLB组(6.81±6.70小时)(p = 0.048)。两组在各时间点的NRS评分相似。未见任何患者出现股四头肌无力。结论PENG阻滞在不引起运动阻滞的情况下提供有效的术后镇痛,有利于髋关节手术患者的早期活动。可作为多模式镇痛的一部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Science Progress
Science Progress Multidisciplinary-Multidisciplinary
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
119
期刊介绍: Science Progress has for over 100 years been a highly regarded review publication in science, technology and medicine. Its objective is to excite the readers'' interest in areas with which they may not be fully familiar but which could facilitate their interest, or even activity, in a cognate field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信