Comparative Effectiveness of Fixed-Dose ICS/LABA Therapy in Adult Patients with Asthma.

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 ALLERGY
Te-Jung Kung, Ching-Fu Weng, Shan-Chieh Wu, Fang-Ju Lin
{"title":"Comparative Effectiveness of Fixed-Dose ICS/LABA Therapy in Adult Patients with Asthma.","authors":"Te-Jung Kung, Ching-Fu Weng, Shan-Chieh Wu, Fang-Ju Lin","doi":"10.1016/j.anai.2025.09.019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting beta-agonist (ICS/LABA) therapy is a mainstay of asthma management, yet real-world comparative evidence across different formulations remains limited.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of prescribed fixed-dose ICS/LABA combinations in reducing moderate-to-severe asthma exacerbations (MSAEs) among adults, stratified by initial ICS dose.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study utilized data from Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database and Cause of Death Registry (2016-2021). Adults with asthma who initiated fixed-dose ICS/LABA therapy between 2017 and 2020 were included. Treatment groups comprised budesonide/formoterol (reference), extrafine beclometasone dipropionate/formoterol, fluticasone propionate/salmeterol, and fluticasone furoate/vilanterol. Patients were stratified by initial ICS dosage into low-dose and medium-to-high-dose cohorts. Risk of MSAE was assessed using Cox proportional hazards model with inverse probability of treatment weighting for covariate adjustment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 128,426 eligible patients, 35,532 were in the low-dose and 88,954 in the medium-to-high-dose cohort. In the low-dose cohort, extrafine beclometasone dipropionate/formoterol (HR: 0.97, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.88-1.09) and fluticasone propionate/salmeterol (HR: 1.16, 95% CI: 0.98-1.37) had a similar risk of MSAE compared to budesonide/formoterol. In the medium-to-high-dose cohort, fluticasone furoate/vilanterol was associated with a slightly lower MSAE risk compared to budesonide/formoterol (HR: 0.92, 95% CI: 0.86-0.97), particularly in those with prior exacerbations (HR: 0.84, 95% CI: 0.77-0.91). Extrafine beclometasone dipropionate/formoterol (HR: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.89-1.04) and fluticasone propionate/salmeterol (HR: 1.06, 95% CI: 0.98-1.15) showed no significant difference.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings suggest that fluticasone furoate/vilanterol may offer a potential advantage for asthma management compared to other fixed-dose ICS/LABA combinations.</p>","PeriodicalId":50773,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Allergy Asthma & Immunology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Allergy Asthma & Immunology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anai.2025.09.019","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting beta-agonist (ICS/LABA) therapy is a mainstay of asthma management, yet real-world comparative evidence across different formulations remains limited.

Objective: This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of prescribed fixed-dose ICS/LABA combinations in reducing moderate-to-severe asthma exacerbations (MSAEs) among adults, stratified by initial ICS dose.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study utilized data from Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database and Cause of Death Registry (2016-2021). Adults with asthma who initiated fixed-dose ICS/LABA therapy between 2017 and 2020 were included. Treatment groups comprised budesonide/formoterol (reference), extrafine beclometasone dipropionate/formoterol, fluticasone propionate/salmeterol, and fluticasone furoate/vilanterol. Patients were stratified by initial ICS dosage into low-dose and medium-to-high-dose cohorts. Risk of MSAE was assessed using Cox proportional hazards model with inverse probability of treatment weighting for covariate adjustment.

Results: Among 128,426 eligible patients, 35,532 were in the low-dose and 88,954 in the medium-to-high-dose cohort. In the low-dose cohort, extrafine beclometasone dipropionate/formoterol (HR: 0.97, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.88-1.09) and fluticasone propionate/salmeterol (HR: 1.16, 95% CI: 0.98-1.37) had a similar risk of MSAE compared to budesonide/formoterol. In the medium-to-high-dose cohort, fluticasone furoate/vilanterol was associated with a slightly lower MSAE risk compared to budesonide/formoterol (HR: 0.92, 95% CI: 0.86-0.97), particularly in those with prior exacerbations (HR: 0.84, 95% CI: 0.77-0.91). Extrafine beclometasone dipropionate/formoterol (HR: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.89-1.04) and fluticasone propionate/salmeterol (HR: 1.06, 95% CI: 0.98-1.15) showed no significant difference.

Conclusion: The findings suggest that fluticasone furoate/vilanterol may offer a potential advantage for asthma management compared to other fixed-dose ICS/LABA combinations.

固定剂量ICS/LABA治疗成人哮喘的疗效比较。
背景:吸入皮质类固醇/长效β激动剂(ICS/LABA)治疗是哮喘治疗的主要方法,但不同制剂的现实世界比较证据仍然有限。目的:本研究旨在比较处方固定剂量ICS/LABA组合在减少成人中至重度哮喘加重(MSAEs)方面的有效性,按初始ICS剂量分层。方法:本回顾性队列研究使用台湾全民健康保险研究数据库和死亡原因登记(2016-2021)的数据。纳入了在2017年至2020年期间开始固定剂量ICS/LABA治疗的成人哮喘患者。治疗组包括布地奈德/福莫特罗(参考)、二丙酸倍氯米松/福莫特罗、丙酸氟替卡松/沙美特罗和糠酸氟替卡松/维兰特罗。根据初始ICS剂量将患者分为低剂量组和中高剂量组。采用Cox比例风险模型评估MSAE的风险,并采用逆概率处理加权进行协变量调整。结果:在128,426例符合条件的患者中,35,532例为低剂量组,88,954例为中至高剂量组。在低剂量队列中,双丙酸倍氯米松/福莫特罗(HR: 0.97, 95%可信区间[CI]: 0.88-1.09)和丙酸氟替卡松/沙美特罗(HR: 1.16, 95% CI: 0.98-1.37)发生MSAE的风险与布地奈德/福莫特罗相似。在中至高剂量队列中,与布地奈德/福莫特罗相比,糠酸氟替卡松/维兰特罗与MSAE风险略低相关(HR: 0.92, 95% CI: 0.86-0.97),特别是那些先前有加重的患者(HR: 0.84, 95% CI: 0.77-0.91)。二丙酸倍氯米松/福莫特罗(HR: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.89-1.04)和丙酸氟替卡松/沙美特罗(HR: 1.06, 95% CI: 0.98-1.15)的精量差异无统计学意义。结论:研究结果表明,与其他固定剂量ICS/LABA组合相比,糠酸氟替卡松/维兰特罗可能在哮喘治疗方面具有潜在优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
6.80%
发文量
437
审稿时长
33 days
期刊介绍: Annals of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology is a scholarly medical journal published monthly by the American College of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. The purpose of Annals is to serve as an objective evidence-based forum for the allergy/immunology specialist to keep up to date on current clinical science (both research and practice-based) in the fields of allergy, asthma, and immunology. The emphasis of the journal will be to provide clinical and research information that is readily applicable to both the clinician and the researcher. Each issue of the Annals shall also provide opportunities to participate in accredited continuing medical education activities to enhance overall clinical proficiency.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信