Meaghen Quinlan-Davidson, Kristin Cleverley, Skye Barbic, Darren Courtney, Gina Dimitropoulos, Lisa D Hawke, Nadia Nandlall, Clement Ma, Matthew Prebeg, J L Henderson
{"title":"Youth-developed recommendations on public health planning for future pandemics or public health emergencies: a national Delphi study.","authors":"Meaghen Quinlan-Davidson, Kristin Cleverley, Skye Barbic, Darren Courtney, Gina Dimitropoulos, Lisa D Hawke, Nadia Nandlall, Clement Ma, Matthew Prebeg, J L Henderson","doi":"10.17269/s41997-025-01109-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To generate concrete, youth-derived recommendations for government, policymakers, and service planners to support public health planning for the next pandemic or public health emergency.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a virtual, modified Delphi, Youth Delphi Expert Panel Members rated recommendation items over three rounds, with the option to create their own recommendations items. 'Consensus' was defined a priori if ≥ 70% of the entire group, or subgroups of youth (e.g., age, race/ethnicity, gender and sexual identities), rated items at a 6 or 7 (on a 7-point Likert scale). Items that did not achieve consensus were dropped. Content analysis was used for qualitative responses in Rounds 1 and 2. Youth were engaged as members of an expert advisory committee throughout the design, implementation, and interpretation of findings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of n = 40 youth participated in Round 1 with good retention (> 95%) in subsequent rounds. Youth endorsed eleven recommendations to support public health planning for future pandemics or public health emergencies. Youth prioritized easily accessible and understandable information about pandemics; equitably and efficiently distributed vaccines; increased awareness of timely and accessible mental health and substance use services in schools, workplaces, and communities; and greater investment in free or inexpensive MHSU services.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>For Canada to move forward in a relevant, efficient, and ethically sound manner, decisions must be guided by the population that these decisions affect. These recommendations can be used to guide Canada's strategies and policies to prepare for future public health emergencies and pandemics, prioritizing the needs of youth, families/caregivers, and communities.</p>","PeriodicalId":51407,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Public Health-Revue Canadienne De Sante Publique","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Public Health-Revue Canadienne De Sante Publique","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17269/s41997-025-01109-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: To generate concrete, youth-derived recommendations for government, policymakers, and service planners to support public health planning for the next pandemic or public health emergency.
Methods: Using a virtual, modified Delphi, Youth Delphi Expert Panel Members rated recommendation items over three rounds, with the option to create their own recommendations items. 'Consensus' was defined a priori if ≥ 70% of the entire group, or subgroups of youth (e.g., age, race/ethnicity, gender and sexual identities), rated items at a 6 or 7 (on a 7-point Likert scale). Items that did not achieve consensus were dropped. Content analysis was used for qualitative responses in Rounds 1 and 2. Youth were engaged as members of an expert advisory committee throughout the design, implementation, and interpretation of findings.
Results: A total of n = 40 youth participated in Round 1 with good retention (> 95%) in subsequent rounds. Youth endorsed eleven recommendations to support public health planning for future pandemics or public health emergencies. Youth prioritized easily accessible and understandable information about pandemics; equitably and efficiently distributed vaccines; increased awareness of timely and accessible mental health and substance use services in schools, workplaces, and communities; and greater investment in free or inexpensive MHSU services.
Conclusions: For Canada to move forward in a relevant, efficient, and ethically sound manner, decisions must be guided by the population that these decisions affect. These recommendations can be used to guide Canada's strategies and policies to prepare for future public health emergencies and pandemics, prioritizing the needs of youth, families/caregivers, and communities.
期刊介绍:
The Canadian Journal of Public Health is dedicated to fostering excellence in public health research, scholarship, policy and practice. The aim of the Journal is to advance public health research and practice in Canada and around the world, thus contributing to the improvement of the health of populations and the reduction of health inequalities.
CJPH publishes original research and scholarly articles submitted in either English or French that are relevant to population and public health.
CJPH is an independent, peer-reviewed journal owned by the Canadian Public Health Association and published by Springer.
Énoncé de mission
La Revue canadienne de santé publique se consacre à promouvoir l’excellence dans la recherche, les travaux d’érudition, les politiques et les pratiques de santé publique. Son but est de faire progresser la recherche et les pratiques de santé publique au Canada et dans le monde, contribuant ainsi à l’amélioration de la santé des populations et à la réduction des inégalités de santé.
La RCSP publie des articles savants et des travaux inédits, soumis en anglais ou en français, qui sont d’intérêt pour la santé publique et des populations.
La RCSP est une revue indépendante avec comité de lecture, propriété de l’Association canadienne de santé publique et publiée par Springer.