Development of an Alternative to Preservation Efficacy Tests Using the Metabolic Activity of Microorganisms.

Mai Watanabe, Asako Mitani, Jun Sato, Takumi Sonoda, Naofumi Shigemune
{"title":"Development of an Alternative to Preservation Efficacy Tests Using the Metabolic Activity of Microorganisms.","authors":"Mai Watanabe, Asako Mitani, Jun Sato, Takumi Sonoda, Naofumi Shigemune","doi":"10.4265/jmc.30.3_71","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Consumer products such as detergents, fabric softeners, and cosmetics are typically used in various environments. Manufacturers must ensure the quality of products and ensure their safety through their lifecycle, from manufacturing to usage. Preservation efficacy testing (PET) is typically conducted to determine the preservative of a product prior to use. However, PET is time-consuming and laborious due to its long-term storage and culture-based detection methods. In this study, we focused on the metabolic activities of microorganisms and developed a rapid alternative to PET. We observed that 72 h of preservation was sufficient to predict preservation efficacy using the metabolic activity method. Finally, the accuracy of the metabolic activity method was compared to that of PET using a variety of products such as detergents and cosmetics. The accuracy of this alternative method exceeds 85% for highly fluid and easy-to-handle samples. These results suggest that the developed metabolic activity method possesses the potential to determine the preservative efficacy of products in only four days(72 h of preservation and 24 h of detection). Thus, this method possesses the potential to provide a rapid and simple alternative to PET.</p>","PeriodicalId":73831,"journal":{"name":"Journal of microorganism control","volume":"30 3","pages":"71-79"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of microorganism control","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4265/jmc.30.3_71","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Consumer products such as detergents, fabric softeners, and cosmetics are typically used in various environments. Manufacturers must ensure the quality of products and ensure their safety through their lifecycle, from manufacturing to usage. Preservation efficacy testing (PET) is typically conducted to determine the preservative of a product prior to use. However, PET is time-consuming and laborious due to its long-term storage and culture-based detection methods. In this study, we focused on the metabolic activities of microorganisms and developed a rapid alternative to PET. We observed that 72 h of preservation was sufficient to predict preservation efficacy using the metabolic activity method. Finally, the accuracy of the metabolic activity method was compared to that of PET using a variety of products such as detergents and cosmetics. The accuracy of this alternative method exceeds 85% for highly fluid and easy-to-handle samples. These results suggest that the developed metabolic activity method possesses the potential to determine the preservative efficacy of products in only four days(72 h of preservation and 24 h of detection). Thus, this method possesses the potential to provide a rapid and simple alternative to PET.

利用微生物代谢活性进行保鲜效果试验的替代方法的发展。
诸如洗涤剂、织物柔顺剂和化妆品等消费品通常在各种环境中使用。制造商必须确保产品的质量,并确保其从生产到使用的整个生命周期的安全。保存功效测试(PET)通常用于在使用前确定产品的防腐剂。然而,由于其长期储存和基于培养的检测方法,PET是费时费力的。在这项研究中,我们着眼于微生物的代谢活动,并开发了一种快速替代PET的方法。我们观察到72 h的保存足以用代谢活性法预测保存效果。最后,将代谢活性法与PET法在洗涤剂和化妆品等多种产品中的准确性进行了比较。对于高流动性和易于处理的样品,该替代方法的准确度超过85%。这些结果表明,所开发的代谢活性方法具有在4天(72 h保存和24 h检测)内确定产品保存效果的潜力。因此,该方法具有提供一种快速和简单的替代PET的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信