Health service utilization for low back pain in Germany between 2000 and 2020-a scoping review of claims data.

IF 2.5 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) Pub Date : 2025-09-16 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fpain.2025.1661722
Julia Truthmann, Simone Kiel, Georg Vrana, Jean-François Chenot
{"title":"Health service utilization for low back pain in Germany between 2000 and 2020-a scoping review of claims data.","authors":"Julia Truthmann, Simone Kiel, Georg Vrana, Jean-François Chenot","doi":"10.3389/fpain.2025.1661722","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Low back pain (LBP) uses a large proportion of health care resources. Data are needed for health care planning, measuring adherence to guidelines for quality assurance, and assessing overuse and underuse of health care services. The aim of this review is to summarize claims data and describe trends in health care utilization for LBP for the years 2000 to 2020.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This scoping review summarizes studies and health reports using claims data of people aged ≥15 years covered by a statutory health insurance in Germany for the period 2000 to 2020. We searched publications in PubMed, EMBASE and Google. Data on health care services were extracted and trends over the years were summarized.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included data from 76 publications, health reports and online databases. Every year, 25 to 32% of adults in Germany seek care for LBP. Most of the claims data cannot be pooled because of differences in standardization and reporting. However, trends are observable. Magnetic resonance imaging increased to 7.5%, plain radiography decreased to 15%. The number of sick leave days decreased slightly over time. Hospital admissions for LBP, spinal surgery, and opioid use increased. Outpatient rehabilitation increased, but the overall use of rehabilitation services remained relatively stable.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Inconsistent reporting standards and fragmentation of German claims data reporting, hinders a comprehensive understanding of health service utilization for low back pain. Despite limitations, current data suggest potential overuse of resources for LBP in Germany, consistently with international data. Given the high proportion of patients consulting for LBP better monitoring of health service utilization is needed to improve quality of care and resource allocation.</p>","PeriodicalId":73097,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland)","volume":"6 ","pages":"1661722"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12479410/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpain.2025.1661722","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Low back pain (LBP) uses a large proportion of health care resources. Data are needed for health care planning, measuring adherence to guidelines for quality assurance, and assessing overuse and underuse of health care services. The aim of this review is to summarize claims data and describe trends in health care utilization for LBP for the years 2000 to 2020.

Methods: This scoping review summarizes studies and health reports using claims data of people aged ≥15 years covered by a statutory health insurance in Germany for the period 2000 to 2020. We searched publications in PubMed, EMBASE and Google. Data on health care services were extracted and trends over the years were summarized.

Results: We included data from 76 publications, health reports and online databases. Every year, 25 to 32% of adults in Germany seek care for LBP. Most of the claims data cannot be pooled because of differences in standardization and reporting. However, trends are observable. Magnetic resonance imaging increased to 7.5%, plain radiography decreased to 15%. The number of sick leave days decreased slightly over time. Hospital admissions for LBP, spinal surgery, and opioid use increased. Outpatient rehabilitation increased, but the overall use of rehabilitation services remained relatively stable.

Conclusions: Inconsistent reporting standards and fragmentation of German claims data reporting, hinders a comprehensive understanding of health service utilization for low back pain. Despite limitations, current data suggest potential overuse of resources for LBP in Germany, consistently with international data. Given the high proportion of patients consulting for LBP better monitoring of health service utilization is needed to improve quality of care and resource allocation.

2000年至2020年间德国腰痛的医疗服务利用率-索赔数据的范围审查
背景:腰痛(LBP)占用了很大比例的医疗资源。卫生保健规划、衡量对质量保证准则的遵守情况以及评估卫生保健服务的过度使用和使用不足都需要数据。本综述的目的是总结索赔数据,并描述2000年至2020年LBP的医疗保健利用趋势。方法:本范围综述总结了研究和健康报告,使用了2000年至2020年期间德国法定健康保险覆盖的≥15岁人群的索赔数据。我们在PubMed, EMBASE和谷歌中检索了出版物。提取了关于保健服务的数据,并总结了多年来的趋势。结果:我们纳入了来自76份出版物、健康报告和在线数据库的数据。每年,德国有25%到32%的成年人因腰痛寻求治疗。由于标准化和报告方面的差异,大多数索赔数据无法汇总。然而,趋势是可以观察到的。磁共振成像增加到7.5%,x线平片减少到15%。随着时间的推移,病假天数略有减少。因腰痛、脊柱手术和阿片类药物使用而入院的人数增加。门诊康复有所增加,但总体康复服务使用保持相对稳定。结论:不一致的报告标准和德国索赔数据报告的碎片化,阻碍了对腰痛卫生服务利用情况的全面了解。尽管存在局限性,但目前的数据表明,与国际数据一致,德国的LBP可能存在过度使用资源的情况。鉴于腰痛患者咨询的比例很高,需要更好地监测卫生服务的利用情况,以提高护理质量和资源分配。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信