Kathryn Hatherly, Lauren Denusik, Cindy Earle, Janis Oram, Barbara Jane Cunningham
{"title":"Virtual delivery of the Target Word parent-implemented language intervention: A pragmatic waitlist control study.","authors":"Kathryn Hatherly, Lauren Denusik, Cindy Earle, Janis Oram, Barbara Jane Cunningham","doi":"10.1080/17549507.2025.2563843","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study, conducted virtually during the COVID-19 pandemic, aimed to assess children's vocabulary, grammar, communicative participation, and phonology skills targeted during the virtual parent-implemented Target Word program.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Forty children between 16 and 27 months who were considered late-to-talk were assigned to immediate treatment or delayed treatment groups using a 1:2 ratio and assessed at four points. Of the 20 children in the immediate treatment group, 16 completed the entire study. Of the 20 children in the delayed treatment group, five completed entire study.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>Across assessment points, most scores in vocabulary (<i>p</i> = 0.17; <i>p</i> = 0.28; <i>p</i> = 0.40), grammar (complexity: <i>p</i> = 0.65; mean length of utterance: <i>p</i> = 0.21; <i>p</i> = 0. 77; <i>p</i> = 0.29) and communicative participation (<i>p</i> = 0.88; <i>p</i> = 0.12; <i>p</i> = 0.98) were not statistically different between groups. However, children made clinically meaningful gains in communicative participation during their Target Word programs (16 and 25 points of average change on the FOCUS-34). Statistically significant differences in phonology were observed during Target Word (<i>p</i>< .01, <i>p</i> = 0.02, <i>p</i> = 0.15). Statistically significant differences in grammar complexity were observed (<i>p</i>< .01; <i>p</i> = 0.02), but not aligned with intervention periods.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Further research is needed to support interpretation of these results, including additional research to explore the most appropriate service pathways for children who are late-to-talk.</p>","PeriodicalId":49047,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology","volume":" ","pages":"1-16"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17549507.2025.2563843","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: This study, conducted virtually during the COVID-19 pandemic, aimed to assess children's vocabulary, grammar, communicative participation, and phonology skills targeted during the virtual parent-implemented Target Word program.
Method: Forty children between 16 and 27 months who were considered late-to-talk were assigned to immediate treatment or delayed treatment groups using a 1:2 ratio and assessed at four points. Of the 20 children in the immediate treatment group, 16 completed the entire study. Of the 20 children in the delayed treatment group, five completed entire study.
Result: Across assessment points, most scores in vocabulary (p = 0.17; p = 0.28; p = 0.40), grammar (complexity: p = 0.65; mean length of utterance: p = 0.21; p = 0. 77; p = 0.29) and communicative participation (p = 0.88; p = 0.12; p = 0.98) were not statistically different between groups. However, children made clinically meaningful gains in communicative participation during their Target Word programs (16 and 25 points of average change on the FOCUS-34). Statistically significant differences in phonology were observed during Target Word (p< .01, p = 0.02, p = 0.15). Statistically significant differences in grammar complexity were observed (p< .01; p = 0.02), but not aligned with intervention periods.
Conclusion: Further research is needed to support interpretation of these results, including additional research to explore the most appropriate service pathways for children who are late-to-talk.
目的:本研究在COVID-19大流行期间进行了虚拟研究,旨在评估儿童在虚拟家长实施的目标单词计划期间的词汇、语法、交际参与和语音技能。方法:将40例16 ~ 27个月的晚说话儿童按1:2的比例分为立即治疗组和延迟治疗组,分4个点进行评估。在立即治疗组的20名儿童中,有16名完成了整个研究。在延迟治疗组的20名儿童中,有5名完成了整个研究。结果:各测评点中,词汇量(p = 0.17; p = 0.28; p = 0.40)、语法(复杂性:p = 0.65;平均话语长度:p = 0.21; p = 0)得分最高。77年;P = 0.29)、交际参与(P = 0.88; P = 0.12; P = 0.98)组间差异无统计学意义。然而,孩子们在目标词项目的交流参与方面取得了临床意义上的进步(FOCUS-34平均变化16分和25分)。目标词的音韵学差异有统计学意义(p< 0.01, p = 0.02, p = 0.15)。语法复杂度差异有统计学意义(p< 0.01; p = 0.02),但与干预时间无关。结论:需要进一步的研究来支持对这些结果的解释,包括进一步的研究来探索对晚说话儿童最合适的服务途径。
期刊介绍:
International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology is an international journal which promotes discussion on a broad range of current clinical and theoretical issues. Submissions may include experimental, review and theoretical discussion papers, with studies from either quantitative and/or qualitative frameworks. Articles may relate to any area of child or adult communication or dysphagia, furthering knowledge on issues related to etiology, assessment, diagnosis, intervention, or theoretical frameworks. Articles can be accompanied by supplementary audio and video files that will be uploaded to the journal’s website. Special issues on contemporary topics are published at least once a year. A scientific forum is included in many issues, where a topic is debated by invited international experts.